Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Are Language Proficiency, First Language, Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, and Enjoyment Involved?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background. The effectiveness of oral corrective feedback (OCF) in language learning is influenced by learners' comprehension and response to various OCF techniques. Therefore, it is essential for teachers to consider learners' preferences for OCF strategies.

Purpose. This quantitative study aimed to investigate the preferences of Thai as a foreign language (TFL) learners for ten commonly discussed types of OCF. Specifically, it examined whether these preferences are influenced by four learner variables: proficiency level, first language (L1), foreign language classroom anxiety (FLCA), and foreign language enjoyment (FLE).

Methods. The study involved 288 university students from Chinese, Japanese, and Korean TFL settings, and the data from questionnaires were analysed using appropriate statistical methods.

Results. The findings indicate that, regardless of proficiency level, L1, FLCA, or FLE level, learners prefer more explicit OCF techniques, such as metalinguistics feedback and explicit correction. However, Korean undergraduates scored lower in the majority of OCF strategies (i.e., ignoring, elicitation, recast, explanation, and public feedback) compared to the other participants. The MANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in ignore, peer correction, recast, and private feedback based on proficiency level and L1 background. Although the differences between the FLE and FLCA approaches were not statistically significant, high FLE and FLCA groups tended to prefer more OCF strategies than the low groups.

Conclusion. This study has significant implications for instructional practices in TFL settings and for L2 lecturers in the classroom. By understanding learners' preferences for OCF, educators can tailor their instructional approaches to meet the specific needs of their students.

About the authors

W. Wiboolyasarin

Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand

Author for correspondence.
Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

P. Tiranant

The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

T. Khumsat

Nanjing Tech University Pujiang Institute, Nanjing, People's Republic of China

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

T. Ngamnikorn

Busan University of Foreign Studies, Busan, Republic of Korea

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

K. Wiboolyasarin

Chandrakasem Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

S. Korbuakaew

Demonstration School of Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

N. Jinowat

Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Bangkok, Thailand

Email: nattawut.ji@ssru.ac.th

References

  1. Adigun, O. T. (2021). Inclusive education among pre-service teachers from Nigeria and South Africa: A comparative cross-sectional study. Cogent Education, 8(1), 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1930491
  2. Bada, E., & Okan, Z. (2000). Students' language learning preferences. The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language, 4(3), 1-15.
  3. Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572132
  4. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.
  5. Deptolla, A. (2019). Language-learner preferences for corrective feedback (Publication No. 13812139) [Master's thesis, University of Colorado at Boulder]. ProQuest Dissertations and These Global.
  6. Dewaele, J.-M. (2017). Psychological dimensions and foreign language anxiety. In S. Loewen, & M. Sato (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of instructed second language acquisition (pp. 433-450). Routledge.
  7. Dewaele, J.-M., & Dewaele, L. (2020). Are foreign language learners' enjoyment and anxiety specific to the teacher? An investigation into the dynamics of learners' classroom emotions. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(1), 45-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.1.3
  8. Dewaele, J.-M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
  9. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054
  10. Ellis, R., & Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring language pedagogy through second language acquisition research. Routledge.
  11. Fidan, D. (2015). Learners' preferences of oral corrective feedback: An example of Turkish as a foreign language learners. Educational Research and Reviews, 10(9), 1311-1317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2015.2162
  12. Geçkin, V. (2020). Do gender differences affect foreign language anxiety and preferences for oral corrective feedback? Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 13(3), 591-608. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.64744
  13. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics 23 step by step: A simple guide and reference (14th ed.). Routledge.
  14. Gómez Argüelles, L., Hernández Méndez, E., & Perales Escudero, M. D. (2019). EFL teachers' attitudes towards oral corrective feedback: A case study. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 21(1), 107-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v21n1.69508
  15. Gooch, R., Saito, K., & Lyster, R. (2016). Effects of recasts and prompts on L2 pronunciation development: Teaching English /ɹ/ to Korean adult EFL learners. System, 60, 117-127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.06.007
  16. Ha, X. V., & Nguyen, L. T. (2021). Targets and sources of oral corrective feedback in English as a foreign language classrooms: Are students' and teachers' Beliefs aligned? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.697160
  17. Horwitz, E. K. (2010). Foreign and second language anxiety. Language Teaching, 43, 154-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480999036X
  18. Horwitz, E. K. (2017). On the misreading of Horwitz, Horwitz, and Cope (1986) and the need to balance anxiety research and the experiences of anxious language learners. In C. Gkonou, M. Daubney, & J.-M. Dewaele (Eds.), New insights into language anxiety: Theory, research and educational implications (pp. 31-47). Multilingual Matters.
  19. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. Modern Language Journal, 70, 125-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781
  20. Huberty, C. J, & Petoskey, M. D. (2000). Multivariate analysis of variance and covariance. In H. E. A. Tinsley, & S. D. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of applied multivariate statistics and mathematical modeling (pp. 183-208). Academic Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012691360-6/50008-2
  21. Kartchava, E., & Ammar, A. (2014). Learners' beliefs as mediators of what is noticed and learned in the language classroom TESOL Quarterly, 48(1), 86-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.101
  22. Lee, E. J. (2013). Corrective feedback preferences and learner repair among advanced ESL students. System, 41(2), 217-230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.01.022
  23. Lee, I. (2017). Classroom assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000247
  24. Li, S. (2018). Corrective feedback in L2 speech production. In J. Liontas (Ed.), The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching (pp. 1-9). John Wiley & Sons.
  25. Li, S. (2021). Oral corrective feedback. In H. Mohebbi, & C. Coombe (Eds.), Research questions in language education and applied linguistics: A reference guide (pp. 353-357). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79143-8_63
  26. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(3), 399-432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263104263021
  27. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265-302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520
  28. Lyster, R., Saito, K., & Sato, M. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classrooms Language Teaching, 46(1), 1-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444812000365
  29. MacIntyre, P. D., & Gregersen, T. (2012). Emotions that facilitate language learning: The positive-broadening power of the imagination. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2, 193-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.2.4
  30. Martínez Agudo, J. D. (2013). An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers' oral corrective feedback. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 265-278.
  31. Muslem, A., Zulfikar, T., Astilla, I., Heriansyah, H., & Marhaban, S. (2021). Students' perception toward oral corrective feedback in speaking classes: A case at English education department students.International Journal of Language Education, 5(4), 244-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v5i4.19010
  32. Nassaji, H. (2016). Anniversary article interactional feedback in second language teaching and learning: A synthesis and analysis of current research. Language Teaching Research, 20(4), 535-562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816644940
  33. Oflaz, A. (2019). The effects of anxiety, shyness and language learning strategies on speaking skills and academic achievement. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 999-1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.999
  34. Papi, M., Wolff, D., Nakatsukasa, K., & Bellwoar, E. (2021). Motivational factors underlying learner preferences for corrective feedback: Language mindsets and achievement goals. Language Teaching Research, 25(6), 858-877. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211018808
  35. Rassaei, E. (2015). Oral corrective feedback, foreign language anxiety and L2 development. System, 49, 98-109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.01.002
  36. Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci003
  37. Sakiroglu, H. Ü. (2020). Oral corrective feedback preferences of university students in English communication classes.International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 172-178.
  38. Sepehrinia, S., Fallah, N., & Torfi, S. (2020). English language teachers' oral corrective preferences and practices across proficiency groups. PROFILE: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 22(2), 163-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v22n2.82369
  39. Tasdemir, M. S., & Yalcin Arslan, F. (2018). Feedback preferences of EFL learners with respect to their learning styles. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1481560
  40. Ur, P. (2012). A course in English language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  41. Wiboolyasarin, K., Kamonsawad, R., Jinowat, N., & Wiboolyasarin, W. (2022). EFL learners' preference for corrective feedback strategies in relation to their self-perceived levels of proficiency. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 5(1), 32-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v5i1.4403
  42. Wiboolyasarin, W., Wiboolyasarin, K., & Jinowat, N. (2020). Learners' oral corrective feedback perceptions and preferences in Thai as a foreign language tertiary setting. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(2), 912-929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17263/jlls.759344
  43. Yakisik, B. Y. (2021). EFL learners' preferences and emotions about oral corrective feedback at secondary education in Turkey: Are there gender and grade-level differences? Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 103-122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v6i1.889
  44. Yang, J. (2016). Learners' oral corrective feedback preferences in relation to their cultural background, proficiency level and types of error. System, 61, 75-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.004
  45. Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from master's students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40, 42-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004
  46. Zhu, Y., & Wang, B. (2019). Investigating English language learners' beliefs about oral corrective feedback at Chinese universities: A large-scale survey. Language Awareness, 28(2), 139-161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1620755
  47. Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Are Language Proficiency, First Language, Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, and Enjoyment Involved.
  48. Preferences for Oral Corrective Feedback: Are Language Proficiency, First Language, Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety, and Enjoyment Involved.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.