What Can Count As Critical Academic Literacy Education?

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The issue of what can count as “critical” in relation to academic literacy education has not been discussed in detail in relative review studies. Therefore, this opinion article aims to contribute to this issue by exploring the question whether a field of academic literacy education can be underpinned.

Approach: First, I revisit some models of academic literacy education (rhetorical models of critical consciousness, models of critical language awareness, genre-based models, multiliteracies, ethnographic-based academic literacies) which have been considered as “critical” in taxonomies of these review studies. Then, I compare these models showing their similarities and differences regarding what is “critical” and how it is situated within academic literacy education.

Conclusion: Finally, I argue that since there are contrasting conceptualisations among these models in relation to what is “critical” and how it can be associated with academic literacy education, critical academic literacy education can count as a relativist and not a unified field. 

About the authors

F. Tentolouris

University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece

Author for correspondence.
Email: ftentolouris@uth.gr

References

  1. Barton, D., Ivanič, R., Appleby, Y., Hodge, R., & Tusting, K. (2007). Literacy, lives and learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203608302
  2. Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. University of Pittsburgh Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt7zwb7k.9
  3. Blummer, B. (2015). Some visual literacy initiative in academic institutions: A literature review from 1999 to the present. Journal of Visual Literacy, 34(1), 1-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2015.11674721
  4. Britton, E. R., & Austin, T.Y. (2022). Critical and dominant language learner ideologies: A case study of two Chinese writers' experiences with a critical language writing pedagogy. TESOL QUARTERLY, 56(2), 629-655. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3086
  5. Chase, G. (1988). Accommodation, resistance and the politics of student writing. College Composition and Communication, 39(1), 13-22. https://www.jstor.org/stable/357812.
  6. Clarence, S., & McKenna, S. (2017). Developing academic literacies through understanding the nature of disciplinary knowledge. London Review of Education, 15(1), 38-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18546/LRE.15.1.04
  7. Clark, R. (1992). Principles and Practice of CLA in the Classroom. In N. Fairclough (Ed.), Critical Language Awareness (pp. 117-140). Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845661
  8. Clark, R., Fairclough, N., Ivanič, R., & Martin-Jones, M. (1991). Critical language awareness. Part II: Towards critical alternatives. Language and Education, 5(1), 41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500789109541298
  9. Cohen, J. R. (1998).Communication criticism: Developing your critical powers. Sage.
  10. Cope, Β., & M. Kalantzis (Eds.). (1993). The powers of literacy. A genre approach to teaching writing. The Falmer Press.
  11. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315838250
  12. Fairclough, N. (Ed.). (1992). Critical language awareness. Longman. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315845661
  13. Freebody, P. (2017). Critical-Literacy education: The Supremely Educational Event. In B. V. Street & S. May (Eds.), Literacies and language education (Encyclopedia of language and education) (pp. 95-107). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02252-9
  14. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 2-18). Taylor & Francis.
  15. Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books.
  16. Fu, J., & Wang, Y. (2022). Inspecting EFL teachers' academic literacy development in multilingual contexts: A global vision.
  17. Heliyon, 8(12), 1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12143
  18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. Arnold.
  19. Hankerson, S. (2023). The world has to stop discriminating against African American Language (AAL): Exploring the language ideologies of AAL-speaking students in college writing. Written Communication, 40(2), 587-619. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221146484
  20. Hasrati, M., & Tavakoli, P. (2019). The rise of non-dissertation track master's programmes: An academic literacies approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(5), 639-651. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1570304
  21. Gee, J. P. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideologies in discourses. The Falmer Press.
  22. Jones, J. (2009). Multiliteracies for academic purposes: Multimodality in textbook and computer-based learning materials in science at university. In A. McCabe, M. O' Donnell, & R. Whittaker (Eds.), Advances in Language and Education (pp. 103-121). Continuum.
  23. Kretovics, J. R. (1985). Critical literacy: Challenging the assumptions of mainstream educational theory. The Journal of Education, 167(2), 50-62. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42742092.
  24. Lea, Μ. R., & Brian V. S. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079812331380364
  25. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (2000). Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: An academic literacy approach. In M. R. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 32-46). Open University Press - Society for Research into Higher Eduction.
  26. Lea, M. R. & Street, B. V. (2006). The academic literacies model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4504_11
  27. Li, D. (2022). A review of academic literacy research development: From 2002 to 2019. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language education, 7(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-022-00130-z
  28. Luke, A. (2012). Critical literacy: Foundational notes. Theory Into Practice, 51(1), 4-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2012.636324
  29. Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1997). Critical literacy and the question of normativity: An introduction. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, &.
  30. P. Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literacies: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 118). Allen and Unwin.
  31. McArthur, J. (2010). Time to look anew: critical pedagogy and disciplines within higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 35(3), 301-315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070903062856
  32. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.66.1.17370n67v22j160u
  33. Newman, M. (2002). The designs of academic literacy: A multiliteracies examination of academic achievement. Bergin & Garvey.
  34. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Lawrence Erlbaum. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600790
  35. Rose, D. (2015). New developments in genre-based literacy pedagogy. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 227-242). Guilford.
  36. Street, B. V. (2006). Literacy events and literacy practices: theory and practice in the New Literacy Studies. In M. J. Marily & K. Jones (Eds.), Multilingual Literacies: Reading and writing different worlds (pp. 17-35). John Benjamins.
  37. Swain, E. (2009). Constructing an effective ‘voice' in academic discussion writing: An appraisal theory perspective. In.
  38. A. McCabe, M. O' Donnell, & R. Whittaker (Eds.), Advances in language and education (pp. 166-184). Continuum.
  39. Tribble, C., & Wingate, U. (2013). From text to corpus: A genre-based approach to academic literacy instruction. System, 41(2), 307-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.03.001
  40. Wang, Y., & Derakhshan, A. (2023). Enhancing Chinese and Iranian EFL students' willingness to attend classes: The role of teacher confirmation and caring. Porta Linguarum, 39(1), 165-192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.vi39.23625
  41. Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Azari Noughabi, M. (2022). The interplay of EFL teachers' immunity, work engagement, and psychological well-being: Evidence from four Asian countries. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2092625
  42. White, P. R. (1997). Dialogue and intersubjectivity: Reinterpreting the semantics of modality and hedging. In M. Coulthard, J. Cotterill, & F. Rock (Eds.), Working with dialogue (pp. 67-80). Neimeyer.
  43. Yoon, B., & Sharif, R. (2015). History of critical literacy through the various theoretical frameworks. In B. Yoon & R. Sharif (Eds.), Critical literacy practice applications of critical theory in diverse settings (pp. 9-19). Springer.
  44. Yu, S. (2021). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 36-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930802187316
  45. Zhou, J., Zhao. K., & Dawson, P. (2020). How first-year students perceive and experience assessment of academic literacies. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 266-278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1637513

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.