Самораскрытие и развитие письменной речи марокканских обучающихся английскому языку как иностранному: влияние на сложность, точность и плавность

Обложка

Цитировать

Полный текст

Аннотация

"В данной статье рассматривается взаимосвязь между самораскрытием учащихся, то есть обменом социальной и позитивной информацией, и развитием письменной речи на занятиях по английскому языку. Для оценки того, способствуют ли размышления учащихся о личном положительном опыте, включая чувства и мнения, улучшению навыков письма, измеряемых по параметрам сложности, точности и беглости, был использован метод пре-тест/пост-тест. Для исследования было отобрано методом случайной выборки 15 участников среди студентов одного из вузов Марокко, обучающихся на кафедре английского языка. Выбор такого состава участников обусловлен стремлением обеспечить равный уровень владения английским языком в письменной форме. Участники выполнили пре-тест, затем шесть тем на позитивное самораскрытие и пост-тест. Чтобы определить, существует ли значительная разница между тестами до и после, был проведен выборочный парный тест. Описательная статистика показывает, что учащиеся продемонстрировали относительное улучшение в сложности и беглости языка. Однако общее улучшение навыков письменной речи не достигло статистически значимого уровня. На общие результаты повлияло то, что студенты имели разную теоретическую подготовку, и им были предложены разные письменные задания. Но, несмотря на это, данное исследование вносит свой вклад в дискуссию о роли самораскрытия в улучшении некоторых языковых аспектов письма и призывает к разработке учебных программ, учитывающих личную жизнь учащихся на занятиях по языку."

Об авторах

Mohsine Jebbour

Университет Мулай Исмаила

Email: mohsine.jebbour@usmba.ac.ma
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0625-9932

Список литературы

  1. Altman, I., & Taylor, D. (1973). Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  2. Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Self-disclosure as a situated interactional practice. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 181-199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604x15733
  3. Barrot, J. S. (2018). Using the sociocognitive-transformative approach in writing classrooms: Effects on L2 learners' writing performance. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(2), 187-201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2017.1387631
  4. Barrot, J., & Gabinete, M. (2019). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners. In P. Jordens & R. Leah (Eds.), International review of applied linguistics in language teaching (pp. 1-24). DeGruyter Mouton.
  5. Bento, S. (1991). [Review of the book Learning and instruction: European research in an international context, Volume 2:2. Analysis of complex skills and complex knowledge domains, by H. Mandl, E. De Corte, S. N. Bennett & H. F. Friedrich]. Computers & Education, 17(2), 169-171.
  6. Berman, J. (2001). Risky writing: Self-disclosure and self-transformation in the classroom. University of Massachusetts Press.
  7. Bernard, J. (2010). Motivation in foreign language learning: The relationship between classroom activities, motivation, and outcomes in a university language-learning environment [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Carnegie Mellon University.http://repository.cmu.edu.
  8. Birhan, A. (2018). Effects of mastery learning instruction on engineering students' writing skills development and motivation. Journal of Language and Education, 4(4), 20-30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-4-20-30
  9. Cayanus, J. L., & Martin, M. M. (2016). Teacher self-disclosure. In P.L. Witt (Ed.), Handbook of communication science (vol: 16. Communication and Learning, pp. 241-258). DeGruyter Mouton.
  10. Cayanus, J. L., Martin, M. M., & Goodboy, A. K. (2009). The relationship between teacher self-disclosure and student motives to communicate. Communication Research Reports, 26(2), 105-113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090902861523
  11. Derlega, V. J., & Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2008). Self-disclosure and starting a close relationship. In S. Sprecher, A. Wenzel & J. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of relationship beginnings (pp. 153-174). Psychology Press.
  12. Derlega, V. J., Anderson, S., Winstead, B. A., & Greene, K. (2010). Positive disclosure among college students: What do they talk about, to whom, and why? Journal of Positive Psychology, 6(2), 119-130. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2010.545430
  13. Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273-284.http://www.jstor.org/stable/330107?origin=JSTOR-pdf.
  14. Foster, P., & Skehan, P. (1996). The influence of planning and task type on second language performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), 299-323. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100015047
  15. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Santangelo, T. (2015). Research-based writing practices and the common core: Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis. The Elementary School Journal, 115(4), 498-522. 10.1086/ 681964. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/681964
  16. Guilloteaux, M. J., & Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigations of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x
  17. Hoadley-Maidment, E. (2000). From personal experience to reflective practitioner: Academic literacies and professional education. In M. Lea & B. Stierer (Eds.), Student writing in higher education: New contexts (pp. 165-78). Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  18. Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461-473. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp048
  19. Iida, A. (2016). Poetic identity in second language writing: Exploring an EFL learner's study abroad experience. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 1-14.https://www.ejal.info/index.php/ejal/article/view/131.
  20. Jebbour, M. (2018). University students' perceptions of the effects of teacher self-disclosure in the English language classroom. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 3(3), 275-285. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v3i3.166
  21. Jebbour, M. (2019). English language teaching in Morocco: A focus on the English department. The Journal of North African Studies. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13629387.2019.1681267
  22. Jebbour, M. (2020). Developing a student self-disclosure measure: A pilot study. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(1), 17-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v5i1.374
  23. Jebbour, M., & Mouaid, F. (2019). The impact of teacher self-disclosure on student participation in the university English language classroom. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 31(3), 424-436.
  24. Jourard, S. (1971). The transparent self. Van Nostrand.
  25. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14, 317-324. 10.1016/ j.tics.2010.05.002. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002
  26. Komalasari, A. (2013). Employing experiential learning to teach writing for English as a foreign language learners through a reflection project. International Journal on Education, 1(1), 24-30.
  27. Lam, R. (2015). Convergence and Divergence of Process and Portfolio Approaches to L2 Writing Instruction: Issues and Implications. RELC Journal, 46(3), 293-308. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688215597119
  28. Lannutti, P. J., & Strauman, E. C. (2006). Classroom communication: The influence of instructor self-disclosure on student evaluations. Communication Quarterly 54(1), 89-99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270496
  29. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. Routledge.
  30. Liao, C. (2016). Enhancing the grammatical accuracy of EFL writing by using an AWE-assisted process approach. System, 62, 77-92. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.02.007
  31. McDonough, K., & Fuentes, C. G. (2015). The effect of writing task and task conditions on Colombian EFL learners' language use. TESL Canada Journal, 32(2), 67-79.
  32. Moon, J. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning. Routledge Falmer.
  33. Myers, S. (1998). Students' self-disclosure in the college classroom. Psychological Reports, 83(7), 1067-1070.https://doi.org/10.2466%2Fpr0.1998.83.3.1067.
  34. Norris, J., & Manchón, R. M. (2012). Investigating L2 writing development from multiple perspectives: Issues in theory and research. In R.M. Manchón (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives (pp. 221-244). de Gruyter Mouton.
  35. Peng, J., & Wang, Ch. (2018). Effect of the linguistic complexity of the input text on alignment, writing fluency, and writing accuracy in the continuation task. Language teaching Research, 00(0), 1-18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818783341
  36. Polio, C. (2001). Research methodology in second language writing: The case of text-based studies. T. Silva & P. Matsuda. (Eds.), On second language writing (pp. 91-116). Erlbaum.
  37. Polio, C., & Park, J. H. (2016). Language development in second language writing. In R. M. Manchon' & P. Matsuda (Eds.), Handbook of second and foreign language writing (pp. 287-306). Routledge.
  38. Polio, C., & Shea, M. C. (2014). An investigation into current measures of linguistic accuracy in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 10-27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2014.09.003
  39. Rosmawati (2014). Second language development dynamics: How dynamic systems theory accounts for issues in second language learning. The Australian Educational and Development Psychologist, 31(1), 66-80. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/edp.2013.22
  40. Serag, A. (2011). Self-disclosure in EFL writing by computers. In A. Stewart (Ed.), JALT2010 Conference Proceedings (pp. 551-564). JALT.
  41. Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1997). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F136216889700100302.
  42. Stotsky, S. (1995). The uses and limitations of personal or personalized writing in writing theory, research, and instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(4), 758-776. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/748197
  43. van Geert, P., & van Dijk, M. (2003). Ambiguity in child language: The problem of inter-observer reliability in ambiguous observation data. First Language, 23(3), 259-284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237030233001
  44. Van Waes, L., & Leijten, M. (2015). Fluency in writing: A multidimensional perspective on writing fluency applied to L1 and L2. Computers and Composition, 38, 79-95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2015.09.012
  45. Wakefield, C.R. (2009). Self-disclosure and cohesion in the religious classroom [Unpublished Master's thesis]. Southern Utah University.https://www.suu.edu.
  46. West, R., & Turner, L. (2010). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
  47. Wheeless, L. R., & Grotz, J. (1976). Conceptualization and measurement of reported self- disclosure. Human Communication Research, 2(4), 338-346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1976.tb00494.x
  48. Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity. University of Hawaii Press.
  49. Zhang, S., Shi, Q., Tonelson, S., & Robinson, J. (2009). Preservice and inservice teachers' perceptions of appropriateness of teacher self-disclosure. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(8), 1117-1124. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.011

Дополнительные файлы

Доп. файлы
Действие
1. JATS XML
Скачать


Creative Commons License
Эта статья доступна по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).