Aspects of role models in bullying as a basis for interaction.

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The object of this study is the role models that can be chosen by the participants of the confrontation within the framework of bullying, the subject of the study was social consequences of the application of specific behavioral scenarios in the conflict. These consequences are manifested through the results of the confrontation and the impact of these results on the statuses and positions in the educational environment at different levels, changes in the structure of factions, and interaction between them. Among the applied research methods are comparison, generalization, and synthesis. In the context of conflict methodology, the work is based on the consideration of the theories of conflict functions of Lewis Сoser and the conflict of Ralph Darendorf. The innovative aspect of the research consists of a comprehensive understanding and analysis of Western experience in the field of pedagogy and the development of new conceptual models. It should be emphasized that few studies of bullying in Russian pedagogical conflictology have been carried out. Western researchers often consider the victim of bullying as a passive participant deprived of subjectivity. The authors propose to perceive bullying as a conflict and consider it not only as bullying but also as a situation of negative leadership. The new models considered in our study highlight victim role scripts and assimilation/accommodation of behaviors within the aggressor/victim dichotomy. In addition, the novelty of the study is manifested in the introduction of the concept of role (emotional) benefit and a comprehensive consideration of the aspects of benefit that a "victim" receives in a conflict. The authors propose a system of scenarios and sub-scenarios of victim behavior, taking into account the assimilation/accommodation of certain behavioral patterns when subjects are included in a bullying situation.

References

  1. Coser L. The functions of the social conflict. NYC: The free press, 1956. Pp. 8-16.
  2. Krisberg L. Sociology of Social Conflict. N.Y.C, Prentice-Hall, 1973. Pp 10-18.
  3. Darendorpf R. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford University Press. California, 1959. Pp. 50-81.
  4. Trufanov, G. А. Governmental control over information distribution as a basis of the social conflict // Конфликтология. – 2019. – Vol. 14, No. 3. – P. 207-221. – EDN SMRPDE.
  5. Trufanov, G. A. The problem of bullying in schools: conflictological comprehension // Вопросы устойчивого развития общества. – 2021. – No. 9. – P. 115-128. – doi: 10.34755/IROK.2021.72.59.076. – EDN KNGVMN.
  6. Усов, С. С. Эмоционально-оценочная номинация реалий в политическом дискурсе в XXI в / С. С. Усов, М. А. Сафонов, Н. Л. Харченко // Известия Волгоградского государственного педагогического университета. – 2020. – № 3(146). – С. 105-109. – EDN NPTBRS.
  7. Содержательно-подтекстовый аспект информативности дискурса в публицистическом тексте / Н. С. Варфоломеева, С. С. Усов, И. Ю. Багдасарова [и др.] // Вестник Российского нового университета. Серия: Человек в современном мире. – 2021. – № 4. – С. 50-55. – doi: 10.25586/RNU.V925X.21.04.P.050. – EDN BSLJZM.
  8. Языковые средства выражения элементов фантастики в политическом дискурсе / И. А. Синицына, М. А. Сафонов, С. С. Усов [и др.] // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия История и филология. – 2021. – Т. 31, № 2. – С. 254-263. – doi: 10.35634/2412-9534-2021-31-2-254-263. – EDN QFOJRR.
  9. Содержательно-подтекстовый слой информативности текста как способ выражения авторской модальности (на примере рассказа И.А. Бунина "в Париже") / Н. Л. Харченко, М. А. Сафонов, С. С. Усов [и др.] // Вестник Удмуртского университета. Серия История и филология. – 2018. – Т. 28, № 3. – С. 419-428. – EDN XVBPRJ.
  10. Trufanov, G. А. Crisis and conflict in Russian contemporary social media // Конфликтология. – 2021. – Vol. 16, No. 1. – P. 132-158. – EDN DZCTXE.
  11. Trufanov, G. A. Modern aspects of conflict management in business organizations in the context of conflict studies in business // Actual Issues of the Modern Economy. – 2021. – No. 8. – P. 14-23. – doi: 10.34755/IROK.2021.51.36.025. – EDN BPHWSA.
  12. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Björkqvist, K., Österman, K., Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, 1-15. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:13.0.CO;2-T
  13. Bayraktar, F., Machackova, H., Dedkova, L., Cerna, A., Ševčíková A. (2015). Cyberbullying: The discriminant factors among cyberbullies, cybervictims, and cyberRunning head: ROLES IN CYBER BULLYING 25 victims in a Czech adolescent sample. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30, 3192-3216. doi: 10.1177/0886260514555006.
  14. Lam, L. T., Cheng, Z., Liu, X. (2013). Violent online games exposure and cyberbullying/victimization among adolescents. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16, 159-164. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0087.
  15. Selkie, E. M., Kota, R., Chan, Y-F., & Moreno, M. (2015). Cyberbullying, depression, and problem alcohol use in female college students: A multisite study. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18, 79-86. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2014.0371.
  16. Brack, K., & Caltabiano, N. (2014). Cyberbullying and self-esteem in Australian adults. Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 8, article 7. doi: 10.5817/CP2014-2-7.
  17. Bauman, S. (2010). Cyberbullying in a rural intermediate school: An exploratory study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 803-833. doi: 10.1177/0272431609350927.
  18. Aoyama, I., Bernard-Brak, L., Talbert, T. (2011). Cyberbullying among high school students: Cluster analysis, sex and age differences and the level of parental monitoring. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology, and Learning, 1, 25-35. doi: 10.4018/ijcbpl.2011010103
  19. Hentig H. Remarks on the Interaction of perpetrator and Victim // The of Criminal and Criminology, 1941. V. 31.
  20. Schoen, S., Schoen, A. (2010). Bullying and Harassment in the United States. The Clearing House, 83(2), 68-72.
  21. Dehue, F. (2013). Cyberbullying research: New perspectives and alternative methodologies. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1-6. doi: 10.1002/casp.2139.
  22. Dehue, F., Bolman, C., Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters’ experiences and parental perception. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 217-223. doi: 10.1089/cpb.2007.0008.
  23. Brooks, R. A., & Cohen, J. W. (2020). The Nature, Scope, and Response to School Bullying. In Criminology Explains School Bullying (1st ed., Vol. 2, pp. 7–28). University of California Press.
  24. Bloom, A. B. (2020). Building Civic Capacity in Schools and Communities. National Civic Review, 109(1), 6-15.
  25. Grmuša, A. (2023). The effectivnes of video surveillance in preventing and interventing bullyng in secondary schools in Serbia. In F. Alcantud-Marín, Y. Alonso-Esteban, C. Berenguer Forner, M. J. Cantero López, J. C. Meléndez Moral, A. R. Moliner Albero, B. Rosello Miranda, M. del M. Sánchez García, P. Sancho Requena, E. Satorres Pons, N. Senent-Capuz, M. Soriano-Ferrer, P. Viguer Seguí, & A. Ygual Fernández (Eds.), Actas del XI Congreso Internacional de Psicología y Educación (pp. 2765-2774). Dykinson, S.L.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).