Assessment of the impact of environmental factors on the development of heavy industry in the Russian Federation
- Authors: Ryzhov I.G.1
-
Affiliations:
- Issue: No 4 (2025)
- Pages: 178-195
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2454-0617/article/view/366965
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DJZUJY
- ID: 366965
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This article focuses on assessing the impact of the environmental factor on the development of heavy industry sectors in the Russian Federation in the context of the current sustainable development agenda and external economic constraints. It examines the contradictions between the goal of accelerated industrial growth, the need to ensure technological and budgetary sovereignty, and the requirement to reduce anthropogenic impact. The analysis covers manufacturing and mining industries, their contribution to the economy and budget, and the key environmental effects of industrial expansion. It also examines the regulatory framework for environmental policy, the dynamics of environmental and climate protection costs, the role of ESG approaches (sustainable development principles), and innovation. The study reveals systemic relationships between industrial indices, environmental costs, and strategic goals for sustainable development. The study uses structural-dynamic and comparative analysis of official statistics (Rosstat), legal and institutional analysis of environmental policy, and content analysis of scientific sources on ESG and innovation to interpret causal relationships and assess trends. The scientific novelty lies in the comprehensive linking of the dynamics of heavy industry indices with the budgetary dependence on resource revenues and the trajectory of environmental costs, including the climate agenda and R&D. It is shown that the growth of output is accompanied by a faster increase in current environmental protection costs, while the funding for environmental R&D is decreasing, which limits the potential for technological cost reduction. The "sustainability gap" has been identified: the expansion of production without adequate innovation support increases the environmental and fiscal burden on environmental measures. The paper concludes that it is advisable to shift the focus to investments in environmental R&D, the modernization of wastewater treatment facilities and best available technologies, ESG standards and principles, and the alignment of development programs with environmental targets and performance metrics.
Keywords
References
Афанасьев, А. А. Промышленная политика России по достижению технологического суверенитета: теоретико-методологические основы и практические аспекты. – М.: Первое экономическое издательство, 2023. – 204 с. doi: 10.18334/9785912924644 EDN: CYTKCM. Атаева, А. Г., Атаев, Д. М. Методологический подход к формированию промышленной политики региона // ArsAdministrandi (Искусство управления). 2023. – Т. 15. – № 1. – С. 153-173. doi: 10.17072/2218-9173-2023-1-153-173 EDN: UKNBJR. Петрова, Е. С. Корпоративное управление в системе ESG // Инновации и инвестиции. – 2022. – № 7. – С. 48-52. EDN: TLUATP. Пашкус, В. Ю., Зюзина, Л. А. Современная промышленная политика: приоритеты развития региональной инновационной системы и проблемы импортозамещения // Маркетинг MBA. Маркетинговое управление предприятием. – 2019. – Т. 10. – № 2. – С. 76-107. EDN: AFZWTF. Халин, В. Г., Чернова, Г. В. Цифровизация и ее влияние на российскую экономику и общество: преимущества, вызовы, угрозы и риски // Управленческое консультирование. – 2022. – № 10. – С. 14-22. Эдилян, Э. Т. "Зеленая" промышленная политика: институционализация, мировой опыт, особенности реализации в России // Государственное и муниципальное управление. Ученые записки. – 2019. – № 2. – С. 180-185. Федеральная служба государственной статистики Российской Федерации. URL: https://rosstat.gov.ru. Механизм достижения целей устойчивого развития в России: проблемы и пути их решения // Научный журнал "Фундаментальные исследования". 02.04.2021. URL: https://fundamental-research.ru/article/view-id=42973. Новая реальность ESG: возможности и российская стратегия в 2025 году // EcoStandart.journal. 10.06.2025. URL: https://journal.ecostandard.ru/esg/ustoychivoe-razvitie/novaya-realnost-esg-vozmozhnosti-i-rossiyskaya-strategiya-v-2025-godu/?ysclid=mg4ong8sh0810652816. Продвижение России по пути устойчивого развития // ИСИЭЗ НИУ ВШЭ. 2025. URL: https://issek.hse.ru/news/1043155168.html. Семь составляющих устойчивого развития в России сегодня // Росконгресс. 21.07.2025. URL: https://roscongress.org/materials/sem-sostavlyayushchikh-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-v-rossii-segodnya/?ysclid=mg4oucc97t93363429. Цели устойчивого развития ООН и Россия. URL: https://roscongress.org/materials/tseli-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-oon-i-rossiya/?ysclid=mg4p4e5g6d385334240. The history of ESG: A journey towards sustainable investing // IBM. 2023. URL: https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/environmental-social-and-governance-history. UNIDO. Industrial Development Report 2022: The Future of Industrialization in a Post-Pandemic World // Vienna: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2022. URL: https://www.unido.org. OECD. Green Growth in the Industrial Sectors: A Review of Trends and Policies // Paris: OECD Publishing, 2015. URL: https://www.oecd.org/environment/green-growth-in-the-industrial-sectors-9789264236813-en.htm. IEA. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020: Special Report on Clean Energy Innovation // Paris: International Energy Agency, 2020. URL: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2020. OECD. Aligning Industrial Policy and Environmental Policy: Towards Green Industrial Transitions // Paris: OECD Publishing, 2021. URL: https://www.oecd.org/environment/aligning-industrial-policy-and-environmental-policy.htm. World Bank. Pollution Prevention and Abatement Handbook: Toward Cleaner Production // Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2022. URL: https://documents.worldbank.org. Sustainability reporting: ESG disclosure and performance of firms // Journal of Cleaner Production, 2023. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136580. Kotsantonis S., Pinney C., Serafeim G. ESG integration in investment management: Myths and realities // Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 2016. URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jacf.12169. Sullivan R., Martindale W. (eds.). Fiduciary duty in the 21st century // UNEP FI, UN PRI, UN Global Compact, 2015. URL: https://www.unepfi.org/publications/investment-publications/fiduciary-duty-in-the-21st-century. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). SASB Standards Overview // Value Reporting Foundation, 2021. URL: https://www.sasb.org/standards. International Finance Corporation (IFC). ESG Standards and Performance Requirements for the Private Sector // IFC, World Bank Group, 2020. URL: https://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/esg-standards.
Supplementary files
