The approval of the blank test "Patriogram" by S.I. Kudinov and A.V. Potyomkin: assessment of structure and reliability

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

The subject of the study is the testing of the "Patriogram" test by S.I. Kudinov and A.V. Potemkin (2009) on a Latvian sample of subjects. This methodology is aimed at studying patriotism as a multi-component, systemic-functional property of personality, characterized by a holistic structure, stable interrelations among its elements, and irreplacability in the characterization of personality. A systematic analysis of scientific sources on patriotism issues allowed for a conceptual clarification of this construct. Based on the interpretation of the concept of "patriotism" proposed by A.V. Potemkin, we suggest the following refined definition: "Patriotism is a systemic-functional property of personality, represented by a set of value, dynamic, emotional, volitional, motivational, cognitive, and reflexive-evaluative components, as well as characteristics of difficulties that ensure the degree of readiness to engage in prosocial activities that contribute to the prosperity of one’s country and society and their protection." The research was conducted in three stages. Initially, a double translation of statements into Latvian was performed with the participation of 48 respondents. In the second stage, the structural validity of the first model of the test was checked on a sample of 200 Latvians. The significance of the second model of the methodology was confirmed in the third stage of the study, with a sample of 250 Latvian students. The results showed satisfactory correspondence to the original data. The tested version of the test included 92 statements from the original 112. The removed 20 statements with insignificant loadings on the factors are explained as irrelevant in relation to the patriotism of Latvians, revealing the specificity of this phenomenon. These statements characterize the weakness and instability of the expression of patriotism, as well as a lack of knowledge and skills regarding participation in patriotic activities. Statements related to experiencing feelings of confusion and awkwardness when expressing one's patriotism, and that such activity is thankless, also proved to be insignificant. This conclusion is supported by studies on patriotism in Latvia, which indicate a very high readiness among Latvian youth to express their patriotism and a good understanding of the tools to do so.

References

  1. Буторина Т. С., Овчинникова Н. П. Воспитание патриотизма средствами образования. СПб. : КАРО, 2004. 314 с.
  2. Кириллова И. В. Патриотизм как ценностно-эмоциональная ориентация личности // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2019. № 3. С. 45-52. doi: 10.17223/1998863X/49/6.
  3. Кудинов С. И., Кудинов В. С. Патриотичность как основа проявления ответственности личности // Актуальные проблемы социальной и дифференциальной психологии и психологии личности : материалы междунар. науч. конф. студентов, аспирантов и молодых ученых. М. : РУДН, 2013. С. 169-175. EDN: TDKULL.
  4. Лубский А. В. Патриотизм и гражданственность в российском обществе, или как преодолеть дефицит гражданственности в российском патриотизме // Гуманитарий Юга России. 2019. Т. 8, № 2. С. 47-66. doi: 10.23683/2227-8656.2019.2.3. EDN: QFUDDU.
  5. Платон. Государство // Собр. соч. : в 4 т. М., 1994. Т. 3. 654 с.
  6. Потёмкин А. В. Национально-психологические особенности проявления патриотизма личности : дис. … канд. психол. наук. Тольятти, 2009. 256 с. EDN: NQPFMN.
  7. Радина Н. К. Патриотизм как социальное явление в научном представлении реальности: концепт и теории // Полис. Политические исследования. 2025. № 2. С. 167-179. doi: 10.17976/jpps/2025.02.12. EDN: YHANTJ.
  8. Расторгуев С. В. Современные подходы к концепту "патриотизм" в научном дискурсе // Власть. 2024. Т. 32, № 1. С. 96-101. doi: 10.24412/2071-5358-2024-1-96-101. EDN: EIGTMD.
  9. Хромова М. Н. Идеи патриотизма в трудах отечественных философов и педагогов // Фундаментальные исследования. 2014. № 5-2. С. 379-382. EDN: SAMZOP.
  10. Adorno T. W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D. J., Sanford R. N. The Authoritarian Personality. New York : Harper and Row, 1950. 970 p.
  11. Ali H. M. Banal nationalism in translation: a case study of Egypt's National Center for Translation // Perspectives: Studies in Translation Theory and Practice. 2024. doi: 10.1080/0907676X.2024.2427693.
  12. Baumeister A. Patriotism // Encyclopedia Britannica. 10 Jul. 2017. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.britannica.com/topic/patriotism-sociology (дата обращения: 24.05.2025).
  13. Berzina I. Patriotisms Latvijas jauniešu vidū un sabiedrībā. Latvijas Nacionālā aizsardzības akadēmija. Drošības un stratēģiskās pētniecības centrs, 2018. P. 1-26. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://www.naa.mil.lv/sites/naa/files/document/PETIJUMS_PATRIOTISMS.pdf (дата обращения: 15.05.2025).
  14. Bilsky W., Janik M., Schwartz S. H. Patriotism and national identity: The importance of including all dimensions of each concept in their measurement // Polish Psychological Bulletin. 2011. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 63-71. doi: 10.1177/0022022110362757.
  15. Curti M. The roots of American loyalty. New York : Columbia University Press, 1946. 267 p. doi: 10.2307/1895106.
  16. Ioannou M., Boot M., Wittingslow R., Mattos A. Patriotism and Nationalism as Two Distinct Ways of Loving One's Country // In: Cushing S. (Ed.). New Philosophical Essays on Love and Loving. Cham : Springer, 2021. P. 293-314. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-72324-8_14.
  17. Jost J. T., Kay A. C. Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2005. Vol. 88, № 3. P. 498-509. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498.
  18. Kosterman R., Feshbach S. Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes // Political Psychology. 1989. Vol. 10, № 2. P. 257-274. doi: 10.2307/3791647.
  19. Lee S. Y., Schwartz S. J. Psychometric evaluation of the Multidimensional Patriotism Scale // Psychological Assessment. 2010. Vol. 22, № 2. P. 369-381.
  20. Lemerise E. A., Dode E. J. Development of a measure of constructive patriotism // Psychological Reports. 1999. Vol. 85, № 3. P. 991-1002.
  21. Morray J. P. Pride of state // The American Political Science Review. 1959. Vol. 53, № 4. P. 1193-1207. DOI: 0.1017/S0003055400235259.
  22. Platow M. J., Haslam J. M., Reicher S. D., Haslam A., Spears R. When Less Is More: Defensive National Identity Predicts Sacrifice of National Interests for National Superiority // Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2023. Vol. 26, № 5. P. 875-892. doi: 10.1177/19485506231185406. EDN: ZWMNER.
  23. Primoratz I. Patriotism // Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2023. [Электронный ресурс]. URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/patriotism/ (дата обращения: 18.08.2025).
  24. Schatz R. T. A Review and Integration of Research on Blind and Constructive Patriotism // Handbook of Patriotism. Springer, 2018. P. 1-19. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30534-9_30-1.
  25. Schatz R. T., Staub E., Lavine H. On the Varieties of National Attachment: Blind Versus Constructive Patriotism // Political Psychology. 1999. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 151-174. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00140.
  26. Somerville J. Patriotism and War // Ethics. 1981. Vol. 91, № 4. P. 568-578. doi: 10.1086/292271.
  27. Simić A. Constructive patriotism and collective actions are related to social entrepreneurship intentions // Social Psychological Bulletin. 2024. Vol. 19. doi: 10.32872/spb.12705.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).