The use of speech sentence audiometry in a free sound field


Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

Objectives -to determine the normative data of sentence speech intelligibility in a free sound field and to estimate the applicability of the Russian Matrix Sentence test (RuMatrix) for assessment of the hearing aid fitting benefit. Material and methods. 10 people with normal hearing and 28 users of hearing aids with moderate to severe sensorineural hearing loss were involved in the study. RuMatrix test both in quiet and in noise was performed in a free sound field. All patients filled in the COSI questionnaire. Results. The hearing impaired patients were divided into two subgroups: the 1st with high and the 2nd with low hearing aid benefit, according to the COSI questionnaire. In the 1st subgroup, the threshold for the sentence intelligibility in quiet was 34.9 ± 6.4 dB SPL, and in noise -3.3 ± 1.4 dB SNR, in the 2nd subgroup 41.7 ± 11.5 dB SPL and 0.15 ± 3.45 dB SNR, respectively. The significant difference between the data of both subgroups and the norm was registered (p <0.05). Conclusion. High informative value of sentence speech audiometry in a free sound field for assessment of the hearing aid fitting benefit is shown. The higher sensitivity of testing in the noise condition compared with the studies in quiet was revealed.

About the authors

Mariya Yu. Boboshko

Pavlov University

Email: boboshkom@gmail.com
PhD, Professor, Head of the Laboratory of hearing and speech.

Irina P. Berdnikova

Pavlov University

PhD, senior research associate of the Laboratory of hearing and speech

Natalya V. Maltzeva

Pavlov University

PhD, senior research associate of the Laboratory of hearing and speech.

References

  1. Бобошко М.Ю., Риехакайнен Е.И. Речевая аудиометрия в клинической практике. СПб., 2019
  2. Warzybok A, Zokoll M, Wardenga N, et al. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test. International Journal of Audiology. 2015;54(2):35-43. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020969
  3. Kollmeier B, Warzybok A, Hochmuth S, et al. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages - A review. International Journal of Audiology. 2015;54(2): 3-16. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2015.1020971
  4. Бобошко М.Ю., Жилинская Е.В., Важыбок А. и др. Речевая аудиометрия с использованием матриксного фразового теста. Вестник оториноларингологии. 2016;81(5):40-44. doi: 10.17116/otorino201681540-44
  5. Mueller HG, Ricketts TA, Bentler R. Modern hearing aids. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. ISBN-13: 978-1-59756-138-9
  6. Таварткиладзе Г.А. Руководство по клинической аудиологии. М.: Медицина, 2013
  7. Musiek FE, Chermak GD. Handbook of central auditory processing disorder. Vol. 1 Auditory neuroscience and diagnosis. San Diego: Plural Publishing, 2014. ISBN-13: 978-1-59756-561-5
  8. Бобошко М.Ю., Бердникова И.П., Гарбарук Е.С. и др. Влияние центральных слуховых расстройств на разборчивость речи при сенсоневральной тугоухости. Вестник оториноларингологии. 2018;2:4-8

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2020 Boboshko M.Y., Berdnikova I.P., Maltzeva N.V.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).