Email this article 
Semiosis of Interpersonal Communication: Determinants in Variability
- Authors: Kardanova-Birukova K.S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow City University
- Issue: No 9(877) (2023)
- Pages: 49-56
- Section: Linguistics
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2542-2197/article/view/333369
- ID: 333369
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The research aims to design a model in which communication presents a multi-component semiotic environment, where sense production is effected. Its dynamics is determined by language units which serve as sense fixators and speech actions as socially acceptable tools of sense explication and translation. The methodological framework of our research is formed by autopoiesis - an avenue of the systems theory - which focuses on the essential plasticity of the system. This approach helps focus on the plasticity of a communicant who is continuously restructuring his / her environment.
About the authors
Ksenia Sufyanovna Kardanova-Birukova
Moscow City University
Author for correspondence.
Email: kardanova-birukovaks@mgpu.ru
Doctor of Philology (Dr. habil.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Linguistics and Translation Studies
Russian FederationReferences
- Shannon, K. (1963). Raboty po teoriji informaciji i kibernetike = Papers on the theory of information and cybernetics. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo inostrannoj literatury. (In Russ.)
- Rid, R. (2005). Osnovy teoriji peredachi informaciji = Foundations of the theory of information transmission. Moscow: Williams. (In Russ.)
- Castells, М. (2006). Mobile Communication and Society: A Global Perspective. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
- Meier, A, Reinecke, L. (2020). Computer-Mediated Communication, Social Media, and Mental Health: A Conceptual and Empirical Meta-Review. Communication Research, 48(8), 1182–1209.
- Newcomb, T. M. (1953). An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological Review, 60(6), 393–404.
- Zalevskaya, A. A. (2007). Vvedenije v psiholingvistiku = Introduction to psycholinguistics. Мoscow: Direct-Media. (In Russ.)
- Klyukanov, I. E. (2010). Kommunikativny universum = Communication universe. Мoscow: Rossijskaya politicheskaya ehnciklopediya (ROSSPEN). (In Russ.)
- Suleimanova, O. A, Guliyants, A. B. (2022). Metodika lingvisticheskogo issledovaniya kak aktual’ny razdel sovremennoy nauchnoy publikaci’I = Linguistic research methods as essential part of academic pulication. MCU Journal of Philology. Theory of Linguistics. Linguistic Education, 4(48), 88–101. (In Russ.)
- Maturana, H. R. (1975). The organization of the living: A theory of the living organization. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 7(3), 313–332.
- Maturana, H. R., Varela, Fr. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Vol. 42. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co. P. 5–58.
- Yolles, M., Frieden, B. R. (2021). Autopoiesis and Its Efficacy – A Metacybernetic View. Systems, 9(4), 75–110.
- Peček, T, Ovsenik, M. (2018). Organization, Autopoiesis and Human Potential as Paradigm of the Future Organization. Organizacija, 51(3), 208-218.
- Korbak, T. (2022). Self-organisation, (M, R) – systems and enactive cognitive science. Adaptive Behavior, 31(1), 35–49.
- Kardanova-Biryukova, K. S. (2021а). Communication as an object of interdisciplinary research. Vestnik of Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanities, 2(844), 24–34. (In Russ.).
- Kardanova-Biryukova, K. S. (2021b). Lingvisticheskaja teorija rechevogo sobytija: strukturno-evolucionny aspect = Linguistic theory of speech event: structural and evolutionary aspect: Senior Doctorate in Philology. Moscow. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
