Landscape framework and geography of religion: a terminological aspect (a case study of geographical publications in English)

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

This article attempts to illustrate current approaches to the study of religious phenomena using the landscape framework. The authors identify similarities and differences in the interpretations of the most common terms used in foreign research to describe religion. The article shows that their semantic difference is mainly determined by their use as tools of either cultural geography or social anthropology. In particular, cultural geography focuses on the material objects of cultural landscapes and their geographical distribution, while social anthropology highlights specific features of people’s religious discourse and practices and analyses social processes that shape the modern world landscape. The term religious landscape can be used in the following ways, depending on how it is operationalized. First, it refers to the totality of material objects associated with religion. Secondly, it refers to the places where rituals take place. Finally, it refers to the territory in which followers of particular religious traditions live. The term religioscape implies a situation of conflict or complementary interaction between followers of different religions sharing the same space. Sacred landscape is sometimes applied as a synonym for the term religious landscape meaning a set of religious material objects. Sometimes it means a complex of natural places or objects of worship (mountains, hills, swamps, and others) that provides a general framework for various individual religious landscapes within it. The term sacroscape refers to the historically formed material manifestations of religiosity influencing both contemporary people and earth’s surface. The term spiritual landscape has several basic meanings. On the one hand, it is used as a synonym for religious landscape or sacred landscape. Secondly, it serves as a broader, generalizing term to describe all aspects of human interaction (ideas, objects, practices) with the supersensible world. Finally, the term spiritual landscape refers to spaces of not only ritual but also everyday practices.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

R. О. Poplavsky

Institute of the Problems of Northern Development, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RAS

Author for correspondence.
Email: roman.poplavskiy@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Tyumen

F. S. Korandei

Tyumen State University

Email: f.s.korandej@utmn.ru
Russian Federation, Tyumen

M. S. Cherepanov

Institute of the Problems of Northern Development, Tyumen Scientific Center, SB RAS

Email: maximcherepanov@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Tyumen

References

  1. Allerton C. Introduction: Spiritual Landscapes of Southeast Asia. Anthropol. Forum, 2009, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 235–251. http://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278387
  2. Anttonen V. Landscapes as Sacroscapes: Why Does Topography Make a Difference. In Sacred Sites and Holy Places. Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape Through Time and Space. Nordeide S.W., Ed. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013, pp. 13–32. http://doi.org/10.1484/M.SEM.1.101564
  3. Appadurai A. Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalisation. Delhi: Oxford Univ. Press, 1997.
  4. Bobrov I.V., Cherepanov M.S. The Muslim Landscape of Tyumen Region: Places, Size, and Socio-Demographic Composition of Urban Prayer Meetings. Islamoved., 2019, no. 4, pp. 46–58. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2018-43-4-193-203
  5. Bovensiepen J. Spiritual Landscapes of Life and Death in the Central Highlands of East Timor. Anthropol. Forum, 2009, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 323–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664670903278437
  6. Büttner M. On the History and Philosophy of the Geography of Religion in Germany. Religion, 1980, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 86–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-721X(80)2990029-9
  7. Chenoweth J.M. Reconstructing a Changing Religious Landscape: The Material Traces of Barbados Quakers, 1655–1800. Int. J. Hist. Archaeol., 2019, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 462–495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10761–018–0475–0
  8. Deffontaines P. The Religious Factor in Human Geography: Its Force and Its Limits. Diogenes, 1953, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/039219215300100203
  9. Dunn K., Piracha A. The Multifaith City in an Era of Post–secularism: The Complicated Geographies of Christians, Non-Christians and Non-faithful Across Sydney, Australia. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 1635–1654. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_86
  10. Dwyer R. The Swaminarayan Movement. In South Asians in the Diaspora: Histories and Religious Traditions. Jacobsen K.A., Kumar P.P., Eds. Leiden; Boston: Brill, 2004, pp. 180–199.
  11. Fickeler P. Fundamental Questions in the Geography of Religions. In Readings in Cultural Geography. Mikesell M., Wagner P., Eds. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press, 1962, pp. 94–117.
  12. Furseth I., Ahlin L., Ketola K., Leis-Peters A. Changing Religious Landscapes in the Nordic Countries. In Religious Complexity in the Public Sphere. Furseth I., Ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan Cham, 2018, pp. 31–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55678-9_2
  13. Gorokhov S. Confessional geospace as an object of study of geography of religions. Izv. Akad. Nauk, Ser. Geogr., 2014, no. 2, pp. 21–30.
  14. Gorokhov S. Geography of Religion in Russia and Abroad: The History of Development and the New Challenges. Vopr. Istorii Estestvozn. Tekh., 2019, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 439–467. https://doi.org/10.31857/s020596060005925-9
  15. Gunzburg D., Brady B. Space, Place, and Religious Landscapes: Living Mountains. London: Bloomsbury Publ., 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350079915
  16. Hacket C., Stonawski M. The Changing Global Religious Landscape. Washington: Pew Research Center, 2017.
  17. Hadži Muhamedović S. Waiting for Elijah. Time and Encounter in a Bosnian Landscape. New York; Oxford: Berhahn Books, 2018. https://doi.org/10.3167/9781785338564
  18. Havlíček T., Klingorová K. City with or without God? Features of post–secularism in religious landscape of post-communist Prague. Soc. Cult. Geogr., 2017, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 789–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2017.1312696
  19. Hayden R., Walker T.D. Intersecting Religioscapes: A Comparative Approach to Trajectories of Change, Scale, and Competitive Sharing of Religious Spaces. J. Am. Acad. Relig., 2013, vol. 81, pp. 399–426. https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lft009
  20. Ierotopiya. Sravnitelnye issledovaniya sakral’nykh prostranstv [Hierotopy. Comparative Studies of Sacred Spaces]. Lidov A.M., Ed. Moscow: Indrik Publ., 2009. 372 p.
  21. Inniger M.G., Vorster J.M., Rheeder R. Changing Religious Landscapes Challenge Confession–Based State Policies on Religion. In die Skriflig / In Luce Verbi, 2020, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 1–10. http://doi.org/10.4102/ids.v54i1.2527
  22. Jiménez–Higueras Á. The Sacred Landscape of Dra Abu el–Naga During the New Kingdom: People Making Landscape Making People. Leiden: Brill, 2020.
  23. Kilde J.H. Thinking about Religious Space: An Introduction to Approaches. In The Oxford Handbook of Religious Space. Kilde J.H., Ed. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2022, pp. 1–22.
  24. Koch N., Valiyev A., Zaini K.H. Mosques as Monuments: An Inter–Asian Perspective on Monumentality and Religious Landscapes. Cult. Geogr., 2018, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474017724480
  25. Kong L. Mapping “New” Geographies of Religion: Politics and Poetics in Modernity. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 2001, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 211–233. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201678580485
  26. Kong L. Global shifts, theoretical shifts: changing geographies of religion. Prog. Hum. Geogr., 2010, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 755–776. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913251036260
  27. La montaña en el paisaje ritual. Broda J., Iwaniszewski S., Montero A., Eds. México: CONACULTA INAH, 2001.
  28. Levine G. On the Geography of Religion. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 1986, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 428–440. https://doi.org/10.2307/621934
  29. Maddrell A., della Dora V., Scafi A., Walton H. Christian Pilgrimage, Landscape and Heritage: Journeying to the Sacred. New York: Routledge, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203751893
  30. McAlister E. Globalization and the Religious Production of Space. J. Sci. Study Relig., 2005, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–5906.2005.00283.x
  31. Miles-Watson J. Christianity and Belonging in Shimla, North India. Sacred Entanglements of a Himalayan Landscape. New Delhi: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350050204
  32. Moazzen M. Formation of a Religious Landscape. Shi’i Higher Learning in Safavid Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2018.
  33. Mu Y., Nepal S.K., Lai P.H. Tourism and Sacred Landscape in Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal. Tour. Geogr., 2019, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2018.1558454
  34. Obadia L. Spatial Turn, Beyond Geography: a New Agenda for Sciences of Religion? Int. Rev. Sociol., 2015, no. 2, pp. 200–217. http://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2015.1039269
  35. Ostrovskaia E.A., Alekseeva E.V. Structured Observation as a Method for Studying the Religious Landscape. Monit. Obshch. Mneniya: Econ. Sots. Peremeny, 2018, no. 2, pp. 71–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2018.2.04
  36. Park C. Sacred Worlds. An Introduction to Geography and Religion. London: Routledge, 1994. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203421055
  37. Pennick N. Celtic Sacred Landscapes. London: Thames and Hudson, 1996.
  38. Peres Prieto M.F, de Oliveira A.B., Leão F.C., Vallada H., Moreira–Almeida A., Lucchetti G. Religious Landscape in Brazil: Comparing Different Representative Nationwide Approaches to Obtain Sensitive Information in Healthcare Research. SSM – Population Health, 2018, no. 6, pp. 85–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2018.08.007
  39. Pitkin A. Sustaining the Sacred Mountains: Tibetan Environmentalism and Sacred Landscape in a Time of Conflict. In Volume II. Intellectual History of Key Concepts. Scott G.A., Travagnin S., Eds. Berlin: De Gryuter, 2020, pp. 181–208. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110547825-010
  40. Pluskowski A., Valk H., Szczepański S. Theocratic Rule, Native Agency and Transformation: Post-Crusade Sacred Landscapes in the Eastern Baltic. Landscapes, 2018, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080 14662035.2018.1561009
  41. Robson J. Power of Place: The Religious Landscape of the Southern Sacred Peak (Nanyue) in Medieval China. Cambridge; London: Harvard Univ. Asian Center, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1x07vr3
  42. Poplavsky R.O., Cherepanov M.S., Bobrov I.V., Shisheliakina A.L. The Protestant landscape of the Tyumen Region: locations, size, and demographic composition of urban church meetings. Vestn. Arkheol., Antropol. Etnogr., 2022, no. 2, p. 191–201. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20874/2071-0437-2022-57-2-15
  43. Sacred Sites and Holy Places. Exploring the Sacralization of Landscape Through Time and Space. Nordeide S.W., Ed. Turnhout: Brepols, 2013.
  44. Scheitle C.P., Finke R. Places of Faith. A Road Trip Across America’s Religious Landscape. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2012.
  45. Setiadi H. Islam and Urbanism in Indonesia: The Mosque as Urban Identity in Javanese Cities. In The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 2415–2438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_127
  46. Sidorov D. Changing Russian Orthodox Landscapes in Post–Soviet Moscow, in The Changing World Religion Map: Sacred Places, Identities, Practices and Politics. Brunn S.D., Ed. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 2453–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9376-6_129
  47. Streletsky V., Gorokhov S. Cultural Geography in Russia in the Early 21st Century: Current State and Key Research Areas. Reg. Res. Russ., 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970522020083
  48. Takahashi S. Image of the Religious Landscape in the USSR in 1965-1985 (on the Example of the Solovki Museum-Reserve). Vestn. Evrazii, 2008, no. 4, pp. 9–26. (In Russ.).
  49. The Changing Religious Landscape of Europe. Knippenberg H., Ed. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis, 2005.
  50. Turner B.S. Religion and Politics: Nationalism, Globalisation and Empire. Asian J. Soc. Sci., 2008, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853106777371175
  51. Tweed T.A. Crossing and Dwelling: A Theory of Religion. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 2008.
  52. Vermander B., Hingley L., Zhang L. Shanghai Sacred: The Religious Landscape of a Global City. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2018.
  53. Wanner C. New Religious Movements and “Alternative Morality” in Ukraine. In Izobretenie religii: desekulyarizatsiya v postsovetskom kontekste [The Invention of Religion: Desecularization in the Post-Soviet Context]. Kormina Zh., Panchenko A., Shtyrkov S., Eds. St.-Petersburg: Izd-vo Evrop. Univ., 2015, pp. 214–232. (In Russ.).
  54. Zelinsky W. The Uniqueness of the American Religious Landscape. Geogr. Rev., 2001, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 565–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.2001.tb00241.x

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».