Urbanism and ethnical: relationship parameters in city space
- Authors: Sertakova I.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Derzhavin Tambov State University
- Issue: Vol 8, No 4 (2022)
- Pages: 861-868
- Section: THEORY AND HISTORY OF CULTURE
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-6953/article/view/301695
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2022-8-4-861-868
- ID: 301695
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
We conduct a cultural and philosophical analysis of urbanism in the context of ethical in the city space. We note the relevance of urban theories and the main problems reflected in them. We emphasize the importance and relevance of the axiological aspect in the study of urbanization as an approach that involves a comprehensive study of the most common features and trends of urbanism, the definition of the cultural and spiritual potential of urban development, and forecasting. The reliance on the theory of values made it possible to introduce the term “urban civilization” a specific system that includes modern cities with their own social and economic structures. The functioning of these structures is closely related to human thinking, lifestyle, ethics, culture of the urban environment. “Ethical” is a concept in the most general form reflecting the spiritual and practical side of people's lives, morality, cultural norms-values, feelings and experiences, intellectual understanding of the culture of society, individual and collective worldview positions. We consider the ethical categories of “happiness” and “hate” as the result of human existence in the city space. We reveal the relationship between the “ethical” and cultural potential of the city. We conclude that the urgent tasks of improving cities, which should not only focus on socioeconomic development, but also take into account the ethical component, bring people closer to spiritual values.
Keywords
About the authors
I. N. Sertakova
Derzhavin Tambov State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: irinasertakova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9812-855X
Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor of History and Philosophy Department
33 Internatsionalnaya St., Tambov 392000, Russian FederationReferences
- Sachkova V.A. Urbanizatsiya kak sotsial’nyy protsess: filosofskiy analiz: avtoref. dis. … kand. filos. nauk [Ur-banization as a Social Process: a Philosophical Analysis. Cand. phil. sci. diss abstr.]. Moscow, 2013, 24 p. (In Russian).
- Shamsetdinova A.P. Sotsial’no-eticheskiy obraz schast’ya i problema ego identifikatsii [Socio-ethical image of happiness and the problem of its identification]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N.I. Lobachevskogo. Seriya: Sotsial’nyye nauki – Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. Series: Social Sciences, 2007, no. 3 (8), pp. 231-235. (In Russian).
- Gordon L. Ot nauchnogo redaktora [From scientific editor]. In: Montgomeri C. Schastlivyy gorod. Kak gorods-koye planirovaniye menyayet nash•ch zhizn’ [Happy City. How City Planning is Changing Our Lives]. Moscow, LLC “Mann, Ivanov and Ferber”, 2019, 365 p. (In Russian).
- Bodriyyar Z. Gorod i nenavist’ [City and Hate]. Logos, 1997, no. 9, pp. 107-117. (In Russian).
- Popov A.V. Kul’turno-imidzhevyy potentsial poseleniy Permskogo kraya: metodika i otsenka [Cultural image potential of Perm Region (Russia) settlements: methods and estimations]. Kul’turnaya i gumanitarnaya geografiya [Cultural and Human Geography], 2012, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 98-106. (In Russian).
- Petrovskaya O.V. Sovremennyye teorii razvitiya urbanizma [The modern theories of the development of urban-ism]. Nauchnaya mysl’ Kavkaza – Scientific Thought of Caucasus, 2014, no. 4 (80), pp. 31-36. (In Russian).
- Klimkina T.A., Sertakova I.N. Razvitiye kul’tury malykh territoriy: diskussionnost’ voprosa i strategiy [Devel-opment of small territories culture: the controversial nature of the issue and strategies]. Derzhavinskiy forum – Derzhavin Forum, 2021, vol.5, no. 17, pp. 123-129. (In Russian).
Supplementary files
