Contemporary poetry book reviews: quantitative analysis
- Authors: Novozhilova E.V.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian State University for the Humanities
- Issue: Vol 7, No 26 (2021)
- Pages: 276-288
- Section: ТЕКСТОЛОГИЯ
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2587-6953/article/view/302452
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.20310/2587-6953-2021-7-26-276-288
- ID: 302452
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The work displays progress and results of the quantitative study of poetry book reviews published in the Russian-language literary periodicals in recent years (2014–2019). We describe the method of material selection (chronological framework, range of sources – literary and philological journals, newspapers, – criteria for selection of literary-critical texts), the method of calculating the volume of material. We give the main quantitative characteristics of the received corpus: total number and total volume of texts, average annual number and volume, average volume of one review (calculated both for the entire array and separately for review-digest – bibliographic leaflets), number of reviewers, number of sources. All sources, which are 46 literary publications, are divided into three groups, depending on the published volume of reviews. The work contains a brief description of these publications in connection with the review activity: the presence and features of literary-critical strategy, rubrication, etc. The appendices to the work provide detailed quantitative data. The research collects a significant corpus of texts (more than 400 a. s.) describing and analyzing contemporary Russian poetry. The quantitative data obtained for the first time helps to form a relevant scientific picture of “who makes Russian literature today”.
About the authors
E. V. Novozhilova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Author for correspondence.
Email: elena.v.novozhilova@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7879-7919
Competitor, Philology and History Institute
6 Miusskaya Sq., GSP-3, Moscow 125993, Russian FederationReferences
- Dashevskiy G. «Pora idti»? [“It’s time to go”?]. Kriticheskaya massa [Critical Mass], 2004, no. 2. (In Russian). Available at: https://magazines.gorky.media/km/2004/2/pora-idti.html (accessed 25.11.2020).
- Ganin M. Bez gneva i pristrastiya [Without anger and addiction]. OpenSpace.ru, 2010, 9 March. (In Russian). Available at: http://os.colta.ru/literature/events/details/16616 (accessed 25.11.2020).
- Kozlov V. Nich’ya zemlya sovremennoy poezii [Nobody’s land of modern poetry]. Voprosy literatury – Issues of Literature, 2018, no. 5, pp. 103-125. (In Russian).
- Vezhlyan E. Kritika: «smert’» ili «promezhutok»? [Criticism: “death” or “gap”?]. Literratura, 2018, no. 122. (In Russian). Available at: http://literratura.org/criticism/2893-evgeniya-vezhlyan-kritika-smert-ili-promezhutok.html (accessed 25.11.2020).
- Shapir M.I. «Tebe chisla i mery net». O vozmozhnostyakh i granitsakh «tochnykh metodov» v gumanitarnykh naukakh [“You have no number and no measure”. On the possibilities and limits of “exact methods” in the humanities]. In: Yarkho B.I. Metodologiya tochnogo literaturovedeniya: Izbrannyye trudy po teorii literatury [Methodology of Exact Literary Studies: Selected Works on the Theory of Literature]. Moscow, Languages of Slavic Cultures Publ., 2006, pp. 875-905. (In Russian).
- Novozhilova E.V. Individualizatsiya v retsenzii na poyeticheskuyu knigu [Individualization in poetic book review]. Neofilologiya – Neophilology, 2019, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 357-363. (In Russian). doi: 10.20310/2587-6953-2019-5-19-357-363
Supplementary files
