“CHOICE” AS LITERARY TEXT OF Y. BONDAREV AND “FILM TEXT” OF V. NAUMOV: “POETIC MANNER NOT FOR ALL”. PART TWO. “RAMZIN’S” SIN: STROKES FOR RESEARCH

In the second of part of this research we continue the study of different text variants interaction. Non-traditional analysis methods are used: hermeneutics, receptive, introduced to scientific use by M.M. Bakhtin, H.G. Gadamer, G. Genette, and also inter textual, having concern to “dialogization” of texts, in this case literary and firm text. Semantic scope of accustomed notions , built in practice of literal studies is spreading significantly. When these methods were not applied or were not actualized during research. At the level of actualization (receptive aesthetics term) genesis of “Ramzin’s sin” is considered, its componential traditional and introduced characteristics . The relation of Ramzin to other charcters, where the central place is given to relations with mother are revealed. Text divergence and cohesions of two versions - great-text and inter-text, an reflected which semantic influence they bear. Basing on the examples of Russian classical literature it is proved why the theme of money is not basic for Russian literature, so plot and sense findings of Y. Bondarev as a writer is in one raw with other outstanding classical works. Philosophic-psychological and axiological borders of Bondarev’s implied sense of “choice”; the status of main characters’ characteristics in general, relatedness with each other, relations with world of other characters in different spatial-time categories. It is devoted to the Years of Cinema, continuing Years of Literature, announced by the President of Russian Federation, 75 anniversary of Great Patriotic War.

text, inter-text, actualization, film text, visuality, Ramzin’s sin, war, axiology, great-text