Diffusion of responsibility in team sports: analysis of the impact on the effectiveness of competitive activity

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

this article examines the phenomenon of diffusion of responsibility in team sports. The main mechanisms of this effect are described, including collective distribution of responsibility, social comparison and cognitive barriers. The consequences for the effectiveness of competitive activity are analyzed, such as a decrease in the speed of decision-making, passivity of players and a decrease in the coordination of team actions. Pedagogical and psychological approaches to minimizing negative consequences are considered, including individualization of game roles, development of leadership qualities and methods of increasing awareness through feedback and analysis of game situations.

About the authors

A. V Bykov

Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov

References

  1. Alfurayj H.S., Hurtado B.F., Lutfi S.L., Rana T.A. Exploring bystander contagion in cyberbully detection: a systematic review // Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2024. doi: 10.1007/s12652-024-04831-w
  2. Ashford M., Abraham A., Poolton J. Understanding a Player’s Decision-Making Process in Team Sports: A Systematic Review of Empirical Evidence // Sports. 2021. Vol. 9. № 5. P. 65. doi: 10.3390/sports9050065
  3. Choudhury R.D., Das J.The Science of Team Dynamics: A Review of Psychological Factors Influencing Team Performance in Sports // International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology. 2024. P. 217 – 224. doi: 10.48175/IJARSCT-22726
  4. D’Antonio J. The role of diffusion of responsibility, responsibility, and attitude in willingness to donate to a world hunger-related charity // International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing. 2013. Vol. 11. № 1. P. 1 – 11. doi: 10.1007/s12208-013-0104-x
  5. Darley J.M., Latane B. Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1968. Vol. 8. № 4. Pt. 1. P. 377 – 383. doi: 10.1037/h0025589
  6. Janssen T.D., M?ller D.L., Mann From Natural Towards Representative Decision Making in Sports: A Framework for Decision Making in Virtual and Augmented Environments // Sports Medicine. 2023. Vol. 53. № 10. P. 1851 – 1864. doi: 10.1007/s40279-023-01884-3
  7. Kettrey H.H., Thompson M.P. Can a Technology-Amplified Bystander Effect Impede the Prevention of Campus Sexual Assault? Findings from an Experimental Vignette Study // Journal of School Violence. 2022. Vol. 22. № 1. P. 138 – 151. doi: 10.1080/15388220.2022.2155831
  8. Naumov P., Tao J. Diffusion of Responsibility in Collective Decision Making // arXiv. 2025. Version 1. doi: 10.48550/ARXIV.2506.07935
  9. Siligato E.G., Iuele M., Barbera F., Bruno G., Tordonato A., Mautone A. Rizzo Freezing Effect and Bystander Effect: Overlaps and Differences // Psych. 2024. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 273 – 287. doi: 10.3390/psych6010017
  10. Thomas K.A., De Freitas J., DeScioli P., Pinker S. Recursive mentalizing and common knowledge in the bystander effect // Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2016. Vol. 145. № 5. P. 621 – 629. doi: 10.1037/xge0000153

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).