Subjective self-regulation and meaning-in-life orientations as determinants of psychological well-being under professional stress

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

context and relevance: the modern professional environment is characterized by high cognitive workload, digital overload, and increasing emotional instability, which intensify the issues of occupational stress and burnout. Specialists in the field of information technology are particularly vulnerable due to remote work, high responsibility, and constant informational pressure. Objective. To empirically investigate and theoretically substantiate the interrelation of subject self-regulation and meaning-in-life orientations as key determinants of psychological well-being under conditions of professional stress. Methodology. An empirical study was conducted with IT specialists (N = 74) using psychodiagnostic tools and statistical analysis. Additionally, a cross-disciplinary theoretical and analytical review of Russian and international studies was conducted, focusing on the phenomena of burnout, well-being, meaning-based regulation, and subject activity. Results. The empirical study established that developed subject self-regulation and a coherent system of meaning-in-life orientations are statistically significantly correlated (r = 0.57, p < 0.001) and contribute to resilience under professional stress, mitigate the effects of digital burnout, and support psychological well-being. A strong correlation was found between meaning-in-life indicators and the scales of "Planning" (r = 0.42, p < 0.001) and "Action Programming" (r = 0.44, p < 0.001), emphasizing the regulatory aspect of meaning stability. Conclusions. The empirical research confirmed that meaningful engagement and internal regulatory resources are critical factors in the prevention of professional distress in the context of digital transformation of labor. The necessity of implementing psychological support programs aimed at fostering self-regulation and meaningful involvement in professional activity is emphasized.

About the authors

A. V Zinevich

Patrice Lumumba Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

ORCID iD: 0009-0001-0458-7238

References

  1. Абульханова К.А. Принцип субъекта в отечественной психологии // Психология. Журнал Высшей школы экономики. 2005. № 4. С. 3 – 21. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-subekta-v-otechestvennoy-psihologii. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/printsip-subekta-v-otechestvennoy-psihologii
  2. Кот А.С., Качина А.А. Профессиональное благополучие специалистов сферы информационных технологий // Организационная психология. 2024. № 1. С. 134 – 157. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/professionalnoe-blagopoluchie-spetsialistov-sfery-informatsionnyh-tehnologiy
  3. Леонтьев Д.А. Психология смысла: природа, строение и динамика смысловой реальности. 2-е, испр. изд. М.: Смысл, 2003. 487 с.
  4. Пилишвили Т.С., Савушкина А.И., Данилова А.Л., Соруко Торрес Н.К. Психологическое благополучие и ценностно-смысловая сфера личности студентов-психологов // Образование и наука. 2021. Т. 23. № 4. С. 126 – 156. doi: 10.17853/1994-5639-2021-4-126-156
  5. Синельникова Е.С., Удовиченко П.А. Смысложизненные ориентации и саморегуляция как психологические корреляты конструктивного совладания со стрессом в юношеском возрасте // Теоретическая и экспериментальная психология. 2023. № 1 (16). С. 79 – 89. doi: 10.11621/TEP-23-05
  6. Arora S., Hastings J.D. A survey-based quantitative analysis of stress factors and their impacts among cybersecurity professionals // Research & Publications, Dakota State University. 2025. № 86. URL: https://scholar.dsu.edu/ccspapers/86
  7. Boreham I.D., Schutte N.S. The relationship between purpose in life and depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis // Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2023. Vol. 79. P. 2736 – 2767. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23576
  8. Jentsch A., Hoferichter F. Life satisfaction, psychological stress, and present-moment attention: A generalizability study // Frontiers in Psychology. 2024. Vol. 15. Article ID: 1258896. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1258896.
  9. Jin G., Jiang J., Liao H. The work affective well-being under the impact of AI // Scientific Reports. 2024. Vol. 14. Article number: 25483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75113-w
  10. Kabat-Zinn J. Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness [Электронный ресурс]. 2nd ed. New York: Bantam Books, 2013. 400 p. ISBN 978-0-345-53972-4. URL: https://www.bantamdell.com
  11. Kartol A., S?ner O., Griffiths M.D. The relationship between psychological distress, meaning in life, and life satisfaction in the COVID-19 pandemic // Anales de Psicolog?a. 2023. Vol. 39. No. 2. P. 197 – 206. doi: 10.6018/analesps.518001
  12. Martinez Montes C., Penzenstadler B., Feldt R. The factors influencing well-being in software engineers: A cross-country mixed-method study // ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology. 2025. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1 – 35.
  13. Mohamed N.J.B., Abu Bakar A.Y., Ifdil I. The psychological well-being and self-compassion on Malaysian teachers of counseling and guidance // Acta Counseling and Humanities. 2020. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 63 – 65. doi: 10.46637/ach.v1i1.12
  14. Naidu C.K., Maddala S. Integrating theories of stress and burnout: A comprehensive framework for research and practice // European Economic Letters. 2024. Vol. 14. No. 3. P. 180 – 189. doi: 10.52783/eel.v14i3.1763
  15. Van Dierendonck D., Lam H. Interventions to enhance eudaemonic psychological well-being: A meta-analytic review with Ryff’s Scales of Psychological Well-being // Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 2023. Vol. 15. No. 2. P. 594 – 610. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12398
  16. Wrede S.J.S., Claassen K., Rodil Dos Anjos D., et al. Impact of digital stress on negative emotions and physical complaints in the home office: A follow-up study // Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine. 2023. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 2263068. doi: 10.1080/21642850.2023.2263068

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).