Oncologists’ awareness of the ERAS Protocols and RUSSCO guidelines key provisions on nutritional support in patients with cancer
- Authors: Sytov A.V.1, Obukhova O.A.1, Matveeva S.O.1, Budargin E.E.1, Kudryavtsev F.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
- Issue: Vol 5, No 3 (2024)
- Pages: 114-121
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2658-4433/article/view/312022
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinutr677829
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/OTCZVA
- ID: 312022
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite existing evidence supporting the effectiveness of nutritional support in oncology care, its practical implementation by oncologists remains insufficient.
AIM: This study aimed to assess practicing oncologists’ awareness of the key provisions of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO) guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of cancer-related malnutrition and to determine their adherence to these recommendations.
METHODS: A survey was conducted among oncologists. The questionnaire included nine statements addressing respondents’ awareness of the provisions of the RUSSCO clinical guidelines on nutritional support and the frequency of its prescription, oncologists’ adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols, as well as their general attitude toward nutritional status screening.
RESULTS: A total of 233 questionnaires were analyzed. The RUSSCO guidelines on nutritional support were known to 179 (76.8%) respondents; nutritional assessment tools were recognized by 54.1% (n = 126), and 43.3% (n = 101) applied them in practice. Sip feeding was recommended by 146 (62.7%) doctors. Nutritional support was provided preoperatively by 43.8% (n = 102), during chemotherapy by 54.5% (n = 126), during radiotherapy by 36.1% (n = 84), and postoperatively by 60.1% (n = 140) respondents. Adherence oncologists to ERAS protocols regarding preoperative fasting and fluid restriction did not exceed 10%. The vast majority (96.6%) of respondents considered nutritional status assessment important.
CONCLUSION: Despite a relatively high level of awareness of clinical recommendations on nutritional support and general acceptance of nutritional status screening, therapeutic nutrition was practically prescribed by only 36.1% to 62.7% of respondents. To shift the paradigm in the prescription of therapeutic nutrition, educational efforts and further studies demonstrating its effectiveness, particularly in the context of ERAS protocols, are required.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexander V. Sytov
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: drsytov@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6426-3200
SPIN-code: 9859-4667
Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522Olga A. Obukhova
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Author for correspondence.
Email: obukhova0404@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0197-7721
SPIN-code: 6876-7701
Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522Svetlana O. Matveeva
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: matweeva.sveta@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0009-0154-5233
Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
Evgeny E. Budargin
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: budarginy@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-2359-6871
Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
Filipp A. Kudryavtsev
Blokhin National Medical Research Center of Oncology
Email: fil2672@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1828-9768
SPIN-code: 5828-5615
Russian Federation, 23 Kashirskoe shosse, Moscow, 115522
References
- Muscaritoli M, Arends J, Bachmann P, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical Nutrition in cancer. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(5):2898–2913. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.02.005 EDN: PYNEVI
- Arends J, Strasser F, Gonella S, et al. Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. ESMO Open. 2021;6(3):100092. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100092 EDN: JUJSZN
- Ivanova AS, Obukhova OA, Kurmukov IA, Wolf LYa. Review of ESPEN-2021 practical recommendations for cancer patients. Part 1. Clinical nutrition and metabolism. 2022;3(3):140–152. doi: 10.17816/clinutr111900 EDN: YLUOMT
- Ivanova AS, Obukhova OA, Kurmukov IA, Wolf LYa. Review of ESPEN-2021 practical recommendations for cancer patients. Part 2: specific issues of nutritional support. Clinical nutrition and metabolism. 2022;3(4):193–206. doi: 10.17816/clinutr119059 EDN: TKPXSS
- Sytov AV, Zuzov SA, Kukosh MY, et al. Nutritional support. RUSSCO practical recommendations, part 2. Malignant tumors. 2024;14(3s2):163–173. doi: 10.18027/2224-5057-2024-14-3s2-2-08
- Obukhova OA, Bagrova SG, Besova NS, et al. Assessment of the nutritional status of patients with inoperable gastric cancer at the time of initiation of antitumor treatment. Preliminary results of a prospective observational study. Difficult patient. 2018;16(6):6–11. EDN: UYUQCM
- Obukhova OA, Snegovoy AV, Kurmukov IA, et al. Nutritional status of cancer patients before antitumor treatment: a single-center prospective observational study. Clinical nutrition and metabolism. 2020;1(4):178–189. doi: 10.17816/clinutr64707 EDN: NIOWHL
- Obukhova OA, Kurmukov IA, Semenova AA, et al. Nutritional deficiency in patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Prevalence and approaches to correction. Oncohematology. 2024;19(3):233–242. doi: 10.17650/1818-8346-2024-19-3-233-242 EDN: RUTLZP
- Practical recommendations for the prevention and treatment of complications of malignant tumors and antitumor drug therapy. Rosoncoweb. Russian Society of Clinical Oncology [Internet]. Available from: https://rosoncoweb.ru/standarts/suptherapy/
- Bausys A, Luksta M, Anglickiene G, et al. Effect of home-based prehabilitation on postoperative complications after surgery for gastric cancer: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg. 2023;110(12):1800–1807. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad312 EDN: FWHLGY
- Tsiryatyeva SB, Satyvaldaev MN, Abgaryan AS, Pylenko SA. Clinical and pharmacoeconomic effectiveness of preoperative nutritional support in early rehabilitation of patients with lung cancer. Medical Science and Education of the Urals. 2019;20(3(99)):154–157. EDN: PCORFA
- Ruggeri E, Giannantonio M, Agostini F, et al. Home artificial nutrition in palliative care cancer patients: impact on survival and performance status. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(11):3346-3353. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2020.02.021
- Kotov SV, Khachatryan AL, Guspanov RI, et al. Comparative analysis of the use of the accelerated recovery protocol (ERAS) in radical cystectomy. Experimental and Clinical Urology. 2020;(2):78–83. doi: 10.29188/2222-8543-2020-12-2-78-83 EDN: FIHUNZ
- Dalgatov KD, Kozodaeva MV, Titkova SM, et al. Evaluation of the safety of the accelerated recovery protocol (ERAS) in the treatment of patients after pancreaticoduodenal resection. Surgery. Journal im. N.I. Pirogov. 2021;11:19–26. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202111119 EDN: RHWFIP
- Kurtser MA, Dubinin AA, Grodnitskaya EE, et al. Use of the ERAS protocol in elective gynecological surgery: a prospective non-randomized controlled study. Farmateka. 2019;26(6):36–41. doi: 10.18565/pharmateca.2019.6.36–41
- Kabanova A.S. Study of the prevalence of the use of ERAS protocol components in colorectal surgeries. In: MNSK-2020. Medicine. Proceedings of the 58th International Scientific Student Conference. 2020. P. 34. EDN: IGIJLQ
- Weimann A, Braga M, Carli F, et al. ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in surgery. Clin Nutr. 2021;40(7):4745–4761. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.03.031
Supplementary files
