Revival of national public organizations in Kuban at the end of the 20th - beginning of the 21st century

introduction: the article is dedicated to analyzing the revival process of national public organizations in Kuban at the end of the 20th and the beginning of the 21st century. During this period, the region entered a special phase of ethnocultural and sociopolitical changes associated with the collapse of the USSR and the democratization of public and political life. The author examines the historical conditions preceding the revival process and the specific characteristics of these organizations' functioning within the context of Russian society's transformation. Methods and Materials: the study employs an interdisciplinary approach, including historical-sociological analysis, comparative method, and a systematic approach to studying societal processes. The research's source base consists of archival documents, legislative acts, materials from the periodical press, as well as data from field studies, such as interviews with representatives of national organizations. Results: the author identifies that the change in state ideology, the liberalization of public life, and the growth of ethnic identity played a key role in the revival of national organizations. In Kuban, long known for its ethnocultural diversity, dozens of national-cultural associations were formed, including Armenian, Ukrainian, Belarusian, Greek, Cossack, and other communities. These organizations focused their efforts on preserving national culture, language, and traditions, as well as helping the population adapt to changing conditions. However, their establishment process was accompanied by several difficulties, including funding issues, the lack of clear legal regulations, and competition among associations. Conclusion: the study demonstrates that the revival of national public organizations in Kuban has become an important factor in the formation of civil society in the region. The activities of such associations have contributed to preserving ethnocultural diversity and strengthening interethnic dialogue. However, further development will require government support measures and the creation of favorable conditions for their work. The article is relevant for understanding the processes of regional development in a multiethnic society.

Кубань, национальная организация, возрождение, консолидация, национальные меньшинства