The history of the emergence and development of the institution of bringing as an accused and bringing charges in the United States of America
- Authors: Karpova G.S1,2,3
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee named after A.Ya. Sukharev
- Investigator of the Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Kursk region
- Senior Lieutenant of Justice
- Issue: Vol 8, No 1 (2025)
- Pages: 85-90
- Section: ARTICLES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2658-5693/article/view/377047
- ID: 377047
Cite item
Abstract
the article examines the formation of the institution of prosecution as an accused in the United States of America with the aim of comparative legal analysis with the institution of prosecution as an accused in the Russian Federation and the development of proposals on the possibility of changing the modern criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation in terms of bringing charges by analogy with the procedure for bringing charges in the United States. The paper analyzes the sources of US criminal procedure law in their historical development, the causes and conditions of the formation of modern criminal justice. To achieve the purpose of this study, the objectives are to analyze the sources of US criminal procedure law, the provisions on the procedure for bringing an accused and bringing charges, and based on it, to consider the option of changing the criminal procedure legislation of Russia in terms of bringing as an accused.
About the authors
G. S Karpova
Moscow Academy of the Investigative Committee named after A.Ya. Sukharev; Investigator of the Interdistrict Investigative Department of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation for the Kursk region; Senior Lieutenant of Justice
References
- Barth J. Criminal Prosecution in American History: Private or Public? 67 S.D. L. REV. 119, 2022. P. 125.
- Robert I. Broussard. The Short Form Indictment: History, Development, and Constitutionality // Louisiana law review. 1944. Vol. 6. № 1. P.78.
- Чельцов-Бебутов М.А. Уголовный процесс главнейших империалистических государств: пособие для студентов заочников. М.: Тип. «Красная звезда», 1949. С. 69.
- Prosecution: history of the public prosecutor. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/legal-and-political-magazines/prosecution-history-public-prosecutor (date of treatment: 17.09.2024)
- Justia. Confiscation Cases, 74 U.S. 454 (1868) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/74/454/ (date of treatment: 01.08.2024)
- Donald J. Hall, The Role of the Victim in the Prosecution and Disposition of a Criminal Case, 28 Vanderbilt Law Review 931, 1975. P. 975.
- Пешков М.А. Источники уголовно-процессуального права США // Вестник РУДН. Серия: Юридические науки. 2000. № 1. C. 108 – 111.
- Гуценко К.Ф. Уголовный процесс основных капиталистических государств (Англия. США). Вып. I. М.: УДН, 1969. C. 112.
- Justia. United States v. Kilpatrick, 726 F. Supp. 789 (D. Colo. 1989) [Electronic resource]. URL: https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/726/789/1739684/ (date of treatment: 15.09.2024)
- Волосова Н.Ю. Уголовно-процессуальное законодательство США: общая характеристика, законодательства штатов, сравнительный анализ. М.: Юрлитинформ, 2008. C. 149 – 160.
- Строгович М.С. Уголовный процесс в США и Англии, его реакционная сущность (текст): материалы к лекциям по курсу уголовного процесса для слушателей ВЮА. М.: (Б.И.), 1950. C. 20 – 21.
Supplementary files
