Metaphorical Foundations of the Generational Imaginary of Urban Russian Youth
- Authors: Nartova N.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- HSE University
- Issue: Vol 16, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 29-49
- Section: Research Discourse: Generations
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2687-0401/article/view/268254
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2024.16.2.2
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FJOYWW
- ID: 268254
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The concept of generation has not lost its relevance for many decades; moreover, in the context of the erosion of traditional social classifications, it has acquired particular significance in the formation of social identities. Generational optics are actively used not only in academic debate, but also in political, media, and marketing. The names assigned to cohorts in public discussion become their name, sometimes a stigma or brand, but are not always recruited and used by individuals themselves to describe their generation. The metaphors used in generational names structure the understanding of a generation, its characteristics and place in the socio-historical process. Of particular interest is young people, who are actively building a picture of the world and defining their own generation. The article focuses on the metaphorical foundations of the generational imaginary of modern Russian youth. Based on the materials of 61 qualitative interviews with urban educated middle-class youth in St. Petersburg, four key metaphorical concepts of generation were identified, one of which is common to all the youth studied, three are cohort-specific. A common one involves the metaphor of “technological change”. Cohort-specific ones, reflecting both the difference in life stages and generational characteristics, are represented by the metaphor of “deceived hopes” among 30-year-olds, the metaphor of “children of the 90s” among 25-year-olds, and the metaphor of “moving forward” among 20-year-olds.
Keywords
About the authors
Nadezhda Andreevna Nartova
HSE University
Email: nnartova@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9026-3047
SPIN-code: 8382-7397
ResearcherId: K-6388-2015
Candidate of Sociology, Senior Research, Centre for Youth Studies St. Petersburg, Russia
References
- Бурдье П. Социология социального пространства. М.: Институт экспериментальной социологии; СПб.: Алетейя, 2007. EDN: QOECDF
- Bourdieu P. (2007) Sotciologia sotcialnogo prostranstva [Sociology of Social Space]. Moscow: Institut eksperimentalnoj sociologii; St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
- Здравомыслова Е., Роткирх А., Темкина А. Введение. Создание приватности как сферы заботы, любви и наемного труда // Новый быт в современной России: гендерные исследования повседневности. СПб.: Издательство Европейского университета в Санкт-Петербурге, 2009. С. 7—30. EDN: XNGTCP
- Zdravomislova E., Rotkirh A., Temkina A. (2009) Vvedenie. Sozdanie privatnosti kak sferi zaboti, lubvi I naemnogo truda [Introduction. Creating Privacy as a Sphere of Care, Love and Wage Labor]. In: Novij bit v sovremennoj Possii: gendernie issledovaniya povsednevnosti [Gender Studies of Everyday Life in Contemporary Russia]. St. Petersburg: Izdatelstvo Evropejskogo universiteta v Sankt-Peterburge. P. 7—30. (In Russ.)
- Лакофф Дж., Джонсон М. Метафоры, которыми мы живем. М.: Издательство ЛКИ, 2023.
- Lakoff G., Johnson M. (2023) Metafori, kotorimi mi zhivem [Metaphors We Live By]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo LKI. (In Russ.)
- Максимова O.A. Самоидентификация и коллективная память поколений современного российского общества // Ученые записки Казанского университета. Серия Гуманитарные науки. 2014. Т. 156. № 6. С. 246—252. EDN: TQALWV
- Maksimova O.A. (2014) Self-Identification and Collective Memory of Generations in Contemporary Russian Society. Uchenie zapiski Kazanskogo universiteta. Seria Gumanitarnie nauki [Proceedings of Kazan University. Humanities Series]. Vol. 156. No. 6. P. 246—252. (In Russ.)
- Мангейм К. Очерки социологии знания. М.: ИНИОН РАН, 2000.
- Mannheim K. (2000) Ocherki sotciologii znania [Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge]. Moscow: INION RAN. (In Russ.)
- Семенова В.В. Социальный портрет поколений // Россия реформирующаяся / Под ред. Л.М. Дробижевой. М.: Academia, 2002. № 2. C. 184—212. EDN: PDHLCV
- Semenova V.V. (2002) Sotcialnii portret pokolenia [The Social Portrait of Generations]. In: L.M. Drobizheva (ed.) Rossiya reformiruyushchayasya [Reforming Russia]. Moscow: Academia. No. 2. P. 184—212. (In Russ.)
- Семенова В.В. Социальная динамика поколений: проблема и реальность. М.: РОСПЭН, 2009. EDN: QOKHWP
- Semenova V.V. (2009) Sotcialnaya dinamika pokolenij: problema i realnost [Social Dynamics of Generations: Problem and Reality]. Moscow: ROSPEN. (In Russ.)
- Урри Дж. Социология за пределами обществ: виды мобильности для XXI столетия. М.: Издательский дом ВШЭ, 2012.
- Urry J. (2012) Sotciologia za predelami obschestv: vidi mobilnosti dlya XXI stoletiya [Sociology Beyond Societies. Mobilities for the Twenty-First Century]. Moscow: Izdatelskij dom VShE. (In Russ.)
- Boyle K.A. (2023) Millennial Career-identities: Reevaluating Social Identification and Intergenerational Relations. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 89—109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15350770.2021.1945989
- Correa Т. (2014) Bottom-up Technology Transmission Within Families: Exploring How Youths Influence Their Parents’ Digital Media Use with Dyadic Data. Journal of Communication. Vol. 64. No. 1. P. 103—124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067
- Corsten M. (1999) The Time of Generations. Time and Society. Vol. 8. No. 2—3. P. 249—272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X99008002003
- Manning N. (2013) “I mainly look at things on an issue by issue basis”: Reflexivity and Phronêsis in Young People’s Political Engagements. Journal of Youth Studies. Vol. 16. No. 1. P. 17—33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2012.693586
- Moreno A., Urraco M. (2018) The Generational Dimension in Transitions: A Theoretical Review. Societies. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 1—12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/soc8030049
- Omelchenko E.L. (2021) Twenty Five Years of Youth Studies: Global Names—Local Trends. In: Youth in Putin’s Russia. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 1—65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82954-4_1
- Roberts S., France A. (2021) Problematizing a Popular Panacea: a Critical Examination of the (Continued) Use of “Social Generations” in Youth Sociology. The Sociological Review. Vol. 69. No. 4. P. 775—791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120922467
- Timonen V., Conlon C. (2015) Beyond Mannheim: Conceptualising How People “Talk” and “Do” Generations in Contemporary Society. Advances in Life Course Research. Vol. 24. P. 1—9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2015.03.001
- Woodman D., Leccardi C. (2015) Generation, Transitions, and Culture as Practice: a Temporal Approach to Youth Studies. In: Youth Cultures, Transitions, and Generations. Bridging the Gap in Youth Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan. P. 56—68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137377234_5
Supplementary files



