Associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older: data from the Russian EVKALIPT Study
- Authors: Sharashkina N.V.1, Vorobyeva N.M.1, Izyumov A.D.1, Balaeva M.M.1, Sorokina A.V.1, Runikhina N.K.1, Kotovskaya Y.V.1, Tkacheva O.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
- Issue: Vol 28, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 80-90
- Section: Original study article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/RFD/article/view/280662
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/RFD634503
- ID: 280662
Cite item
Abstract
Background: Currently, the number of elderly and senile patients is steadily increasing. Physical frailty significantly worsens prognosis in this population, making the evaluation of its relationship with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors a pertinent area of study.
Aim: To examine the associations between socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors and physical frailty in outpatient patients aged 65 and older.
Materials and methods: A sub-analysis of the EVKALIPT study included 2,553 outpatient patients aged 65 and older (mean age 76.9 years, 32.2% men). Participants were divided into three age subgroups: 65–74 years, 75–84 years, and 85 years and older. A two-stage comprehensive geriatric assessment was conducted: the first stage involved a questionnaire on socio-economic status, and the second stage involved an objective examination using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB). Physical frailty was defined based on SPPB results as follows: 10–12 points indicated no frailty (“robust” patients), 8–9 points indicated pre-frailty (“pre-frail” patients), and ≤ 7 points indicated physical frailty.
Results: Total SPPB scores ranged from 0 to 12 (median 7, interquartile range 4–9), with the prevalence of physical frailty at 58%. Patients with physical frailty had poorer socio-economic status. Multivariate regression analysis identified eight independent factors associated with physical frailty: age (per year), female sex, absence of a partner, disability, educational level as an ordinal variable (1 to 6, where 1 is no education and 6 is a doctoral degree), past blood donation, continued employment, and material resources as an ordinal variable (1 to 3, where 1 is low and 3 is high).
Conclusions: In outpatient patients aged 65 and older, physical frailty is associated with socio-economic, demographic, and anthropometric factors. High levels of education, past blood donation, continued employment, and high material resources were found to have a protective effect against physical frailty.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Natalya V. Sharashkina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: sharashkina@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6465-4842
SPIN-code: 7695-0360
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine), Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Natalya M. Vorobyeva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: natalyavorobjeva@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6021-7864
SPIN-code: 3269-1397
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Andrey D. Izyumov
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Author for correspondence.
Email: v.jugularis@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7815-4104
SPIN-code: 8299-2360
MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Madina M.-B. Balaeva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: m.balaeva94@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1969-8923
SPIN-code: 1297-1136
MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Anastasia V. Sorokina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: awsorokina@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-4697-4417
SPIN-code: 3006-8606
MD, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Nadezhda K. Runikhina
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: nkrunihina@rgnkc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5272-0454
SPIN-code: 7127-1801
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Yulia V. Kotovskaya
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: kotovskaya@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1628-5093
SPIN-code: 5698-8983
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Russian Gerontology Research and Clinical Center
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226Olga N. Tkacheva
N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University
Email: tkacheva@rgnkc.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4193-688X
SPIN-code: 6129-5809
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor, Российский геронтологический научно-клинический центр
Russian Federation, 16 First Leonova St., Moscow, 129226References
- Gu D, Andreev K, Dupre M.E. Major trends in population growth around the world. China CDC Wkly. 2021;3(28):604–613. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.160
- Cieza A, Sabariego C, Bickenbach J, et al. Rethinking disability. BMC Medicine. 2018;1(16):14. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-1002-6
- Davydov EL, Tikhonova NV, Glushanko VS, et al. Asthenic syndrome in elderly people: diagnostic, treatment and rehabilitation trends. Siberian medical review. 2020;5(125):40–48. EDN: HNGCTO doi: 10.20333/2500136-2020-5-40-48
- Courtwright AM, Zaleski D, Tevald M, et al. Discharge frailty following lung transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(10):e13694. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13694
- Clinical guidelines Senile asthenia. 2024. [Internet]. Available from: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/recomend/613_2?ysclid=m4k3eu547b846032772 . Accessed: 04 July 2024. (In Russ.)
- Jung HW, Baek JY, Jang IY, et al. Short physical performance battery as a crosswalk between frailty phenotype and deficit accumulation frailty index. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2021;76(12):2249–2255. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glab087
- Wang X, Hu J, Wu D. Risk factors for frailty in older adults. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022;101(34):e30169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030169
- Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines on frailty. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(1):11–46. EDN: JCMOSK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2020-11-46
- Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, Runikhina NK, et al. Clinical guidelines frailty. Part 2. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2020;(2):115–130. EDN: SLCYCK doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-2-2020-115-130
- Vorob’eva NM, Tkacheva ON, Kotovskaya YuV, et al. Russian epidemiological study evkalipt: protocol and basic characteristics of participants. Russian journal of geriatric medicine. 2021;(1):35–43. EDN: OSMVEM doi: 10.37586/2686-8636-1-2021-35-43
- Gordon EH, Hubbard RE. Do sex differences in chronic disease underpin the sex-frailty paradox? Mech Ageing Dev. 2019;179:44–50. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2019.02.004
- Oksuzyan A, Juel K, Vaupel JW, et al. Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2008;20(2):91–102. doi: 10.1007/BF03324754
- Park C, Ko FC. The science of frailty: sex differences. Clin Geriatr Med. 2021;37(4):625–638. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.008
- Kojima G, Aoyama R, Tanabe M. Associations between social isolation and physical frailty in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(11):e3–e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.06.012
- Gale CR, Westbury L, Cooper C. Social isolation and loneliness as risk factors for the progression of frailty: the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Age Ageing. 2018;47(3):392–397. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx188
- Chastin S, Gardiner PA, Harvey JA, et al. Interventions for reducing sedentary behaviour in community-dwelling older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;6(6):CD012784. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012784.pub2
- Kojima G, Walters K, Iliffe S, et al. Marital status and risk of physical frailty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21(3):322–330. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.017
- Trevisan C, Grande G, Vetrano DL, et al. Gender differences in the relationship between marital status and the development of frailty: A Swedish Longitudinal Population-Based Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020;29(7):927–936. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8095
- Sirotko ML, Denisenko MB, Zolotovskaya IA, Komarova MV. Medical and social status of patients over 80 years old subject to single or joint residence. Advances in Gerontology. 2021;34(3):446–453. EDN: QXDBKT doi: 10.34922/AE.2021.34.3.015
- Sampaio LS, Carneiro JAO, Coqueiro RDS, Fernandes MH. Indicadores antropométricos como preditores na determinação da fragilidade em idosos. Cien Saude Colet. 2017;22(12):4115–4124. (In Portuguese). doi: 10.1590/1413-812320172212.05522016
- Closs VE, Ziegelmann PK, Flores JHF, et al. Anthropometric measures and frailty prediction in the elderly: an easy-to-use tool. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2017;2017:8703503. doi: 10.1155/2017/8703503
- Bellelli F, Consorti E, Hettiarachchige TMK, et al. Relationship among age, education and frailty in older persons. J Frailty Aging. 2023;12(4):326–328. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2023.39
Supplementary files
