Informativeness of the doppler twinkling artifact in the diagnosis of urinary tract calculi
- Authors: Ryazanov V.V.1,2, Sadykova G.K.1,2, Zheleznyak I.S.2, Kutsenko V.P.1, Libert A.A.1, Postanogov R.A.1, Kuznetsova N.Y.3, Stolova E.N.1
-
Affiliations:
- Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
- Military Medical Academy
- Scientific Research Institute of Pulmonology
- Issue: Vol 42, No 3 (2023)
- Pages: 285-292
- Section: Reviews
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/RMMArep/article/view/264767
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar528480
- ID: 264767
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The kidney stone disease (nephrolithiasis, urolithiasis) is a common urological problem that affects both adults and children and has a high recurrence rate. Early and reliable imaging diagnosis of urolithiasis is important for early pain relief and the avoidance of complications that require surgical intervention. Non-contrast computed tomography is considered the method of choice in the diagnosis of urolithiasis, however, this method is associated with exposure to ionizing radiation. Ultrasound diagnostics or sonography, in contrast, is considered as the method of early diagnosis of urolithiasis that is widely spread, highly accessible and does not use ionizing radiation. Recently, the attention of sonographers has been attracted by the so-called twinkling artifact or the artifact of the “colored comet tail”, which occurs in the Doppler color flow mapping behind a calculus in the urinary tract. The twinkling artifact is a phenomenon of a rapid change (“twinkle”) of red and blue behind the calculus. Among adult patients, the artifact shows high sensitivity in finding urinary stones, but at the same time a high level of false-positive results. However, the sensitivity of the artifact in children is higher than in adults, whereas the rate of false-positive findings is much lower. According to many authors, the sensitivity and specificity of the twinkling artifact as an independent diagnostic sign of urolithiasis are both very heterogeneous, especially compared to non-contrast computed tomography. Nevertheless, the artifact is known to increase the diagnostic efficiency in stone detection to more than 90%. We believe that the twinkling artifact in the Doppler color flow mapping should always be considered as an additional diagnostic tool, which is complementary to B-mode ultrasonography and increases its sensitivity and specificity.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vladimir V. Ryazanov
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; Military Medical Academy
Email: 79219501454@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0037-2854
SPIN-code: 2794-6820
M.D., D.Sc. (Medicine); Assotiated Professor
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgGulnaz K. Sadykova
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University; Military Medical Academy
Email: kokonya1980@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6791-518X
SPIN-code: 3115-7430
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg; Saint PetersburgIgor S. Zheleznyak
Military Medical Academy
Email: igzh@bk.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7383-512X
SPIN-code: 1450-5053
M.D., D.Sc. (Medicine); Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgValeriy P. Kutsenko
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: val9126@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9755-1906
SPIN-code: 5760-0218
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgAngelina A. Libert
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: angelinalbrt@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0004-0726-1809
SPIN-code: 6982-7498
6th grade student
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgRoman A. Postanogov
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: r.a.postanogov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0523-9411
SPIN-code: 8686-1597
radiologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgNatalya Yu. Kuznetsova
Scientific Research Institute of Pulmonology
Author for correspondence.
Email: kznnataly@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0005-1057-5048
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, MoscowEmiliya N. Stolova
Saint Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University
Email: emilinast@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0008-0590-9906
SPIN-code: 2779-4372
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Nabheerong P, Kengkla K, Saokaew S, Naravejsakul K. Diagnostic accuracy of Doppler twinkling artifact for identifying urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound. 2023;26(2): 321–331. doi: 10.1007/s40477-022-00759-z
- Verhagen MV, Watson TA, Hickson M. Acoustic shadowing in pediatric kidney stone ultrasound: a retrospective study with non-enhanced computed tomography as reference standard. Pediatr Radiol. 2019;49(6):777–783. doi: 10.1007/s00247-019-04372-x
- Behbahan AG, Emami E. Etiology of Urolithiasis in Children. Journal of Pediatric Nephrology. 2022;10(2):74–82. doi: 10.22037/jpn.v10i2.37104
- Ryazanov VV, Kutsenko VP, Sadykova GK, et al. Differential diagnosis of urinary stones of different chemical composition, by using dual energy computed tomography. Vrach. 2023;34(3):43–48. (In Russ.) doi: 10.29296/25877305-2023-03-08
- Din XJ, Hing EY, Abdul Hamid H. Diagnostic Value of Colour Doppler Twinkling Artefact in Detecting Nephrolithiasis. Hong Kong Journal of Radiology. 2020;3(4):268–274. doi: 10.12809/hkjr2017049
- Hanafi MQ, Fakhrizadeh A, Jaafaezadeh E. An investigation into the clinical accuracy of twinkling artifacts in patients with urolithiasis smaller than 5 mm in comparison with computed tomography scanning. J Family Med Prim Care. 2019;8(2):401. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_300_18
- Krakhotkin DV, Chernylovskyi VA, Sarica K, et al. Diagnostic value ultrasound signs of stones less than or equal to 10 mm and clinico-radiological variants of ureteric colic. Asian Journal of Urology. 2023;10(1):39–49. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.015
- Roberson NP, Dillman JR, O’Hara SM, et al. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study. Pediatr Radiol. 2018;48(7):962–972. doi: 10.1007/s00247-018-4099-7
- Cunitz BW, Harper JD, Sorensen MD, et al. Quantification of Renal Stone Contrast with Ultrasound in Human Subjects. J Endourol. 2017;31(11):1123–1130. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0404
- Abdel-Gawad M, Kadasne RD, Elsobky E, et al. Prospective Comparative Study between Color Doppler Ultrasound with Twinkling and Non-Contrast Computed Tomography in the Evaluation of Acute Renal Colic. The Journal of Urology. 2016;196(3):757–762. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.03.175
- Laher AE, McDowall J, Gerber L, et al. The ultrasound ‘twinkling artefact’ in the diagnosis of urolithiasis: hocus or valuable point-of-care-ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2020;27(1):13–20. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000601
- Bacha R, Manzoor I, Gilani SA, Khan AI. Clinical Significance of Twinkling Artifact in the Diagnosis of Urinary Stones. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019;45(12):3199–3206. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.015
- Rokni E, Simon JC. The effect of crystal composition and environment on the color Doppler ultrasound twinkling artifact. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68(3):035021. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb2ad
- Rokni E, Zinck S, Simon JC. Evaluation of Stone Features That Cause the Color Doppler Ultrasound Twinkling Artifact. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2021;47(5):1310–1318. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2021.01.016
- Gromov AI, Sapozhnikov OA, Kaprin AD. Doppler twinkling artifact: physical mechanisms and place in diagnostic practice. State of the art. Medical Visualization. 2023;27(1):120–134. (In Russ.) doi: 10.24835/1607-0763-1206
- Adel H, Sattar A, Rahim A, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Doppler Twinkling Artifact for Identifying Urinary Tract Calculi. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5647. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5647
Supplementary files
