Assessment of personal protective equipment for medical personnel during a new coronavirus pandemic
- Authors: Batov V.E.1, Kuznetsov S.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Military Medical Academy
- Issue: Vol 41, No 1 (2022)
- Pages: 77-82
- Section: Clinical Practice Guidelines
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/RMMArep/article/view/84027
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/rmmar84027
- ID: 84027
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of personal protective equipment in contact with patients with new coronavirus infection is the basic measure to ensure the safety of medical personnel. It is known that the use of protective equipment made of materials with low hygroscopicity, air and vapor permeability, under high ambient temperatures and physical activity, can cause overheating of the body. Objectively, during the pandemic, medical personnel reported a deterioration in the functional state up to and even fainting, caused by prolonged use of protective suits. Protective equipment made it difficult to perform routine tasks and led to a reduction in the quality of work performed.
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Assessment of the effect of personal protective equipment on the functional status of medical personnel.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey of 156 medical workers of military medical organizations was carried out using the original questionnaire. The ease of use of protective equipment was assessed, and at the same time the negative aspects of its use were identified. A study of the thermal condition of 6 volunteers during the use of reusable and disposable personal protective equipment sets was carried out under laboratory conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The majority of respondents reported a negative impact on the functional state of the body when using personal protective equipment. According to questionnaire data, skin damage occurred in 88% of cases; fogging of safety glasses in 81%; visual impairment in 70%; inadequate suit size in 61%; subjective feeling of heat at work in 61%; headaches in 45% of cases. An assessment of the thermal condition of the reusable and disposable suits at a temperature of 25°C and light physical work indicated that the body heat levels of the volunteers were within acceptable normative values.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of personal protective equipment has a negative effect on the functional state of the medical workers body, which requires a rational approach to the selection of protective the provision of an optimal regime of work and rest Considering the possibility of using personal protective equipment under different conditions, including increased ambient temperatures (over +30°С) and/or intense physical exertion, there is a need for further study of their effects in order to develop preventive measures.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Vyacheslav E. Batov
Military Medical Academy
Author for correspondence.
Email: batov_s@inbox.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7626-1950
SPIN-code: 6544-9704
Russian Federation, 6, Akademika Lebedeva str., Saint Petersburg, 194044
Sergey M. Kuznetsov
Military Medical Academy
Email: kusnez-s-maks@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5104-5389
SPIN-code: 7329-0560
M.D., Ph.D. (Medicine), Associate Professor
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Denisov EI, Prokopenko LV, Pfaf VF Issues of occupational health of healthcare workers and pandemic COVID-19. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(1):49–61. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-1-49-61
- Ivchenko EV, Kotiv BN, Ovchinnikov DV, Butsenko SA. Results of the work of the Military Medical Academy research institute of novel coronavirus infection problems through 2020–2021. Bulletin of the Russian Military Medical Academy. 2021;23(4):93–104. (In Russ.) doi: 10.17816/brmma83094
- Gorblyansky YuY, Kontorovich EP, Ponamareva OP, Volynskaya EI. Professional aspects of the new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(2):103–114. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-2-103-114
- Garipova RV, Strizhakov LA, Umbetova KT, Safina KR. Occupational diseases of health care workers from exposure to infectious agents: the current state of the problem. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2021;61(1):13–17. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2021-61-1-13-17
- Coca A, Quinn T, Kim J-H, et al. Physiological evaluation of personal protective ensembles recommended for use in West Africa. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2017;11(5):580–586. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2017.13
- Burmistrova OV, Losik TK, Shuporin ES. Physiological and hygienic substantiation of development of a technique of an estimation of overalls for protection working in the heating environment on indicators of a thermal condition. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2019;(12):1013–1019. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2019-59-12-1013-1019
- Lee J, Venugopal V, Latha PK, et al. Heat stress and thermal perception amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in India and Singapore. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(21):1–12. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218100
- Maynard SL, Kao R, Craig D. Impact of personal protective equipment on clinical output and perceived exertion. J R Army Med Corps. 2016;162(3):180–183. doi: 10.1136/jramc-2015-000541
- Tyurin MV, Sokhranov MV, Ivchenko EV, et al. Improvement of the health care delivery system in war-time: monitoring of servicemen’s health slatlts. Military Medical Journal. 2014;335(1):45–47. (In Russ.)
- Konyukhov AV, Geregei AM, Lemeshko VI. Features of the thermal state of medical workers when using personal protective equipment against biological factors. Russian Journal of Occupational Health and Industrial Ecology. 2020;60(11):801–803. (In Russ.) doi: 10.31089/1026-9428-2020-60-11-801-803
Supplementary files
