Staging in the treatment of chronic calculous cholecystitis, complicated by choledocholithiasis
- Authors: Smirnov A.V.1, Stankevich V.R.1, Sazonov D.V.1, Akhmedianov A.R.1, Keshvedinova A.A.1, Solovyev N.A.1, Ivanov Y.V.1, Khabazov R.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
- Issue: Vol 15, No 4 (2024)
- Pages: 38-45
- Section: Original Study Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/clinpractice/article/view/278594
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract642585
- ID: 278594
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic calculous cholecystitis is the most widespread disease in scheduled surgery departments, which in 10–15% of observations is complicated by choledocholithiasis. As of today, the commonly acknowledged staged treatment tactics includes first an endoscopic lithoextraction, later followed by the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, with the durations of performing the latter not being defined. AIM: To define the optimal timings of performing the laparoscopic cholecystectomy after an endoscopic lithoextraction in cases of chronic calculous cholecystitis, complicated by choledocholithiasis. METHODS: The research included patients with chronic calculous cholecystitis, complicated by choledocholithiasis, which during the period of 2016–2023 years have received surgical aid at the Federal State Budgetary Institution “Federal Scientific and Clinical Center” of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia (n=87). Simultaneous endoscopic lithoextraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy were carried out in 20 patients; 19 patients were operated within a single hospitalization with undergoing endoscopic lithoextraction and in 3 days — laparoscopic cholecystectomy (early cholecystectomy); in 48 patients laparoscopic cholecystectomy was delayed by 1–2 months after the endoscopic lithoextraction (interval cholecystectomy). RESULTS: When comparing the treatment results in three groups of patients, no statistically significant differences were observed, however, in the group of interval cholecystectomy, a tendency was shown for increasing the surgery duration, the conversion rate and the number of complications. CONCLUSION: In patients, not having signs of severe course of the disease, it is possible to perform simultaneous endoscopic lithoextraction and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In the absence of complications, the applicable options include early (within 3 days) conducting the laparoscopic cholecystectomy, which does not worsen the results, however, it alleviates the necessity of repeated hospitalization and, probably, slightly decreases the risk of complications.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Alexander V. Smirnov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Author for correspondence.
Email: alvsmirnov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3897-8306
SPIN-code: 5619-1151
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, MoscowVladimir R. Stankevich
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: v-stankevich@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8620-8755
SPIN-code: 5126-6092
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, MoscowDmitry V. Sazonov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: dvsazonov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3253-300X
SPIN-code: 5062-9323
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, MoscowArtur R. Akhmedianov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: rbertvich-artur@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2099-9344
Russian Federation, Moscow
Aishe A. Keshvedinova
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: aishe1998@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0045-2715
SPIN-code: 1577-0901
Russian Federation, Moscow
Nikolay A. Solovyev
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: my_docs@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9760-289X
SPIN-code: 8024-7220
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, MoscowYury V. Ivanov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: ivanovkb83@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6209-4194
SPIN-code: 3240-4335
MD, PhD, Professor
Russian Federation, MoscowRobert I. Khabazov
Federal Scientific and Clinical Centre for Specialized Types of Medical Care and Medical Technologies
Email: khabazov119@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6801-6568
SPIN-code: 8264-7791
MD, PhD
Russian Federation, MoscowReferences
- Ревишвили А.Ш., Оловянный В.Е., Сажин В.П., и др. Хирургическая помощь в Российской Федерации. Москва: Доминант, 2022. 200 с. [Revishvili ASh, Olovyanny VE, Sazhin VP, et al. Surgical aid in the Russian Federation. Moscow: Dominant; 2022. 200 p. (In Russ.)] EDN: DTZCQK
- Gupta V, Abhinav A, Vuthaluru S, et al. The multifaceted impact of gallstones: Understanding complications and management strategies. Cureus. 2024;16(6):e62500. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62500
- Zhu SY, Huang J, Li YJ, et al. Systematic appraisal of guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of choledocholithiasis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023;33(6):673–681. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001230
- Шабунин А.В., Тавобилов М.М., Карпов А.А., Озерова Д.С. Протокол лечения больных с осложненной формой желчнокаменной болезни в хирургической клинике Боткинской больницы // Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова. 2022. № 6. С. 11–17. [Shabunin AV, Tavobilov MM, Karpov AA, Ozerova DS. Modern approaches to the treatment of patients with a complicated form of gallstone disease in the Botkin hospital. Khirurgiya. Zhurnal imeni N.I. Pirogova = N.I. Pirogov Journal of Surgery. 2022;(6):11–17]. EDN: ZPRSDK doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202206111
- McAlister VC, Davenport E, Renouf E. Cholecystectomy deferral in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(4):CD006233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006233.pub2
- Панченков Д.Н., Иванов Ю.В., Сазонов Д.В., и др. Профилактика острого панкреатита при транспапиллярных эндоскопических вмешательствах // Анналы хирургической гепатологии. 2017. Т. 22, № 2. С. 80–88. [Panchenkov DN, Ivanov YV, Sazonov DV, et al. Prevention of acute pancreatitis during endoscopic transpapillary interventions. Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery. 2017;22(2):80–88]. EDN: ZQKALR doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2017280-88
- Шаповальянц С.Г., Ардасенов Т.Б., Паньков А.Г., и др. Сложный холедохолитиаз — результат запоздалого хирургического лечения желчнокаменной болезни // Российский журнал гастроэнтерологии, гепатологии, колопроктологии. 2013. Т. 23, № 4. С. 15–21. [Shapovalyants SG, Ardasenov TB, Pankov AG, et al. Complicated choledocholithiasis — the result of delayed surgical treatment of cholelithiasis. Russian journal of gastroenterology, hepatology, coloproctology. 2013;23(4):15–21. (In Russ.)] EDN: RBJLCT
- Mc Geehan G, Melly C, O’ Connor N, et al. Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: A meta-analysis. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023;49(5):2257–2267. doi: 10.1007/s00068-022-02070-2
- Bass GA, Pourlotfi A, Donnelly M, et al. Bile duct clearance and cholecystectomy for choledocholithiasis: Definitive single-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus staged procedures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021;90(2):240–248. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002988
- Farid M, Baz A, Ramadan A, et al. Two institutes’ experience in laparoendoscopic «rendezvous» technique for patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for stones in the gallbladder and bile duct: A prospective randomized comparative clinical trial. Updates Surg. 2024;76(6):2237–2245. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01973-6
- Bergeron E, Doyon T, Manière T, Désilets É. Delay for cholecystectomy after common bile duct clearance with ERCP is just running after recurrent biliary event. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(12):9546–9555. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10423-0
- Beliaev AM, Booth M. Late two-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk of major bile duct injury. ANZ J Surg. 2016;86(1-2):63–68. doi: 10.1111/ans.12967
- Şenocak R, Çelik SU, Kaymak Ş, Hançerlioğullari O. Perioperative outcomes of the patients treated using laparoscopic cholecystectomy after emergent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for bile duct stones: Does timing matter? Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020;26(3):396–404. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2020.94401
- Friis C, Rothman JP, Burcharth J, Rosenberg J. Optimal timing for laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A systematic review. Scand J Surg. 2018;107(2):99–106. doi: 10.1177/1457496917748224
- Poprom N, Suragul W, Muangkaew P, et al. Timing of laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in cholelithiasis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2023;27(1):20–27. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.22-040
Supplementary files
