Email this article The integrated evaluation of different types surgical treatment of myomes effectiveness
- Authors: Kamilova M.Y.1, Akobirova S.A.1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology
- Issue: Vol 63, No 4 (2014)
- Pages: 17-21
- Section: Articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/jowd/article/view/2678
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/JOWD63417-21
- ID: 2678
Cite item
Open Access
Access granted
Subscription Access
Abstract
The dates of comparative integrated evaluation of conservative myomectomia by different accesses and different amount was presented. There were shown preferences of laparoscopic myomectomia compared laparotomic myomectomia compared laparotomic myomectomia. More significantchanges of psychoemotional states on woman after laparoscopic myomectomia testify that it is necessary to make the evaluation of their psycho-emotional status.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Markhabo Yadgarovna Kamilova
Institute of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology
Email: marhabo1958@mail.ru
MD, associate professor
Sanovbar Ashurovna Akobirova
Institute of obstetrics, gynecology and perinatology
Email: sakobirova@mail.ru
Candidates of Medical Science
References
- Аракелян А. С. Использование различных хирургических доступов (лапаротомия, лапароскопия, влагалищный) при радикальных операциях у больных миомой матки больших размеров: Автореф. дисс… канд.мед. наук. М.; 2010.
- Кулаков В. И. ред. Современные технологии в диагностике и лечении гинекологических заболеваний. М.: ПАНТОРИ; 2005.
- Кулаков В. И., Адамян Л. В. Эндоскопия в гинекологии: руководство для врачей. М.: Медицина; 2000.
- Савельева Г. М., Курцер М. А., Азиев О. В. Современные взгляды на некоторые актуальные вопросы лапараскопической хирургии в гинекологии. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2005; LIX, спецвып.: 16-18.
- Цивьян Б. Л. Малоинвазивная гистерэктомия. Журнал акушерства и женских болезней. 2005; LIX, спецвып.: 42.
- Agdi M., Tulandi T. Minimally invasive approach for myomectomy. Semin Reprod Med. 2010; 28 (3): 228-234.
- Cohen S. L., Einarsson J. I. Total and supracervical hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2011; 38 (4): 651-661.
- Holub Z., Jabor A., Kliment L. et al. Inflammatory responses after laparoscopic uterine myomectomy compared to open surgery in current clinical practice Saudi Med. J. 2006; 27 (11): 1693-1697.
- Pilka R., Marek R., Dzvinčuk P. et al. “Learning curve” robotic radical hysterectomy compared to standardized laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal and open radical hysterectomy //Česka Gynekol. 2013; 78 (1): 20-27.
- Saceanu S., Cela V., Surlin V. et al. Hysterectomy for benign uterine pathology: comparison between robotic assisted laparoscopy, classic laparoscopy and laparotomy. Chirurgia. 2013; 108 (3): 346-350.
- Smorgick N., Patzkowsky K. E., Hoffman M. R. et al. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2014; 289 (1): 101-105.
- Tinelli A., Malvasi A., Guido M. et al. Adhesion formation after intracapsular myomectomy with or without adhesion barrier. Fertil Steril. 2011; 95 (5): 1780-1785.
Supplementary files
