Pathogenetic justification for the therapy of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (primary immune thrombocytopenia) in adults

Cover Page

Cite item

Abstract

The review presents current data on key mechanisms of the pathogenesis of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and comparative characteristics of main therapy methods. In recent years, the interest in studying this long known disease has significantly increased, and basic approaches to diagnosis and treatment have been revised. Recognition of the importance of immune-mediated mechanism of development of this disease led to the replacement of the term used for many years «idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura» to «immune thrombocytopenia». Moreover, development of hemorrhagic manifestations (purpura) is known to be characteristic not for all patients. The basis for the disease development is imbalance between the process of platelet production and destruction, as reflected in decrease of platelet production and increase of their elimination. Conventional treatment methods such as corticosteroids and splenectomy are directed at the suppression of a complex of cell interactions that lead to increased platelet destruction. Modern therapy for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura - thrombopoietin receptor agonists, on the contrary, stimulate the platelet production and are recommended for the use when loss or lack of response to previous therapy are observed. Most likely the efficacy of these drugs in resistant idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura is associated with a fundamentally different, alternative mechanism of action. The idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura group of patients is heterogeneous both in the character of the disease course and possible response to treatment. A limited number of clinical trials of some treatment methods for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and differing criteria for assessing the response to therapy complicate their direct comparison. The imperfection of certain treatment options, due to development of adverse events, and unpredictability of response to treatment necessitate the search for new approaches to the selection of the optimal variant of treatment of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura taking into account the individual characteristics of patients.

About the authors

I I Zotova

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency

Author for correspondence.
Email: hemzot@mail.ru
Saint Petersburg, Russia

S V Gritsaev

Russian Scientific Research Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion of the Federal Medical-Biological Agency

Email: hemzot@mail.ru
Saint Petersburg, Russia

References

  1. Rodeghiero F., Stasi R., Gernsheimer T. et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009; 113: 2386–2393. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503.
  2. Provan D., Stasi R., Newland A.C. et al. International consensus report on the investigation and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2010; 115: 168–186. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-06-225565.
  3. Stasi R., Provan D. Management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in adults. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2004; 79: 504–522. doi: 10.4065/79.4.504.
  4. Maschan A.A., Rumyantsev A.G., Kovaleva L.G. et al. Guidelines of Russian expert council on diagnostic and therapy of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Onkogematologiya. 2010; (3): 36–45. (In Russ.)
  5. Neunert C., Lim W., Crowther M. et al. The American Society of Hematology 2011 evidence-based practice guideline for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2011; 117 (16): 4190–4207. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-08-302984.
  6. Melikyan A.L., Pustovaya E.I., Tsvetaeva N.V. et al. National clinical recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (primary immune thrombocytopenia) in adults (2016 edition). Gematologiya and transfusiologiya. 2017; 62 (1, suppl. 1): 1–24. (In Russ.)
  7. Kovaleva L.G., Safonova T.I., Pustovaya E.I. et al. Clinical statistics and effectiveness of different treatments of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Terapevticheskiy arkhiv. 2011; 4: 60–65. (In Russ.)
  8. Kuter D.J. Milestones in understanding platelet production: a historical overview. Br. J. Haematol. 2014; 165 (2): 248–258. doi: 10.1111/bjh.12781.
  9. Olsson B., Andersson P.O., Jernеs M. et al. T-cell-mediated cytotoxicity toward platelets in chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Nat. Med. 2003; 9 (9): 1123–1124. doi: 10.1038/nm921.
  10. Corthay A. How do regulatory T cells work? Scand. J. Immunol. 2009; 70 (4): 326–336. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02308.
  11. Andre S., Tough D.F., Lacroix-Desmazes S. et al. Surveillance of antigen-presenting cells by CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T cells in autoimmunity. Am. J. Pathol. 2009; 174 (5): 1575–1587. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080987.
  12. McMillan R. The pathogenesis of chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Semin. Hematol. 2007; 44 (4, suppl. 5): S3–S11. doi: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2007.11.002.
  13. Stasi R., Evangelista M.L., Stipa E. et al. Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: current concepts in pathophysiology and management. Thromb. Haemost. 2008; 99 (1): 4–13. doi: 10.1160/TH07-08-0513.
  14. Mineeva N.V., Krobinets I.I., Blinov M.N. et al. Platelet antigens and antibodies. Literature review. Onkogematologiya. 2013; (3): 60–68. (In Russ.)
  15. McMillan R., Durette C. Long-term outcomes in adults with chronic ITP after splenectomy failure. Blood. 2004; 104: 956–960. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-11-3908.
  16. Lisukov I.A., Maschan A.A., Shamardina A.V. et al. Immune thrombocytopenia: clinical manifestation and therapy response. The interim analysis of Russian register of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia and literature review. Onkogematologiya. 2013; (2): 61–69. (In Russ.)
  17. Cohen Y.C., Djulbegovic B., Shamai-Lubovitz O. et al. The bleeding risk and natural history of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with persistent low platelet counts. Arch. Intern. Med. 2000; 160: 1630–1638. doi: 10.1001/archinte.160.11.1630.
  18. Rodeghiero F., Besalduch J., Michel M. et al. Treatment practices in adults with chronic immune thrombocytopenia — a European perspective. Eur. J. Haematol. 2010; 84: 160–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01361.
  19. Gernsheimer T. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Eur. J. Haematol. 2008; (69): 3–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600 0609.2007.00998.
  20. Schoonen W.M., Kucera G., Coalson J. et al. Epidemiology of immune thrombocytopenic purpura in the General Practice Research Database. Br. J. Haematol. 2009; 145: 235–244. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.07615.
  21. Melikyan A.L., Pustovaya E.I., Volodicheva E.M. et al. Incidence of Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in adults in one region of Russia. Blood. 2016; 128 (22): 4941.
  22. Portielje J.E., Westendorp R.G., Kluin-Nelemans H.C. et al. Morbidity and mortality in adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood. 2001; 97: 2549–2554. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.9.2549.
  23. Cuker A., Prak E.T., Cines D.B. Can immune thrombocytopenia be cured with medical therapy? Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2015; 41 (4): 395–404. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1544001.
  24. Godeau B., Lesage S., Divine M. et al. Treatment of adult chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura with repeated high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin. Blood. 1993; 82 (5): 1415–1421. PMID: 8364194.
  25. Ghanima W., Godeau B., Cines D.B. et al. How I treat immune thrombocytopenia: the choice between splenectomy or a medical therapy as a second-line treatment. Blood. 2012; 120 (5): 960–969. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-12-309153.
  26. Kojouri K., Vesely S.K., Terrell D.R. et al. Splenectomy for adult patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a systematic review to assess long-term platelet count responses, prediction of response, and surgical complications. Blood. 2004; 104 (9): 2623–2634. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-03-1168.
  27. Vianelli N., Galli M., de Vivo A. et al. Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in immune thrombocytopenic purpura: long-term results of 402 cases. Haematologica. 2005; 90 (1): 72–77.
  28. Najean Y., Rain J.D., Billotey C. The site of destruction of autologous 111In-labelled platelets and the efficiency of splenectomy in children and adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a study of 578 patients with 268 splenectomies. Br. J. Haematol. 1997; 97 (3): 547–550. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.1997.832723.
  29. Johansson E., Engervall P., Landgren O. et al. Response to splenectomy is durable after a certain point in time in adult patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Eur. J. Haematol. 2006; 77: 61–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2006.00665.
  30. Keidar A., Sagi B., Szold A. Laparoscopic splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura in patients with severe refractory thrombocytopenia. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2003; 33: 116–119. doi: 10.1159/000073856.
  31. Pamuk G.E., Pamuk O.N., Baєlar Z. et al. Overview of 321 patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Retrospective analysis of the clinical features and response to therapy. Ann. Hematol. 2002; 81 (8): 436–440. doi: 10.1007/s00277-002-0488.
  32. Patel V.L., Mahevas M., Lee S.Y. et al. Outcomes 5 years after response to rituximab therapy in children and adults with immune thrombocytopenia. Blood. 2012; 119: 5989–5995. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-393975.
  33. Chapin J., Lee C.S., Zhang H. et al. Gender and duration of disease differentiate responses to rituximab-dexamethasone therapy in adults with immune thrombocytopenia. Am. J. Hematol. 2016; 91 (9): 907–911. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24434.
  34. Abadi U., Yarchovsky-Dolberg O., Ellis M.H.
  35. Immune thrombocytopenia: recent progress in pathophysiology and treatment. Clin. Appl. Thromb. Hemost. 2015; 21 (5): 397–404. doi: 10.1177/­1076029614526639.
  36. Makar R.S., Zhukov O.S., Sahud M.A. et al. Thrombopoietin levels in patients with disorders of platelet production: diagnostic potential and utility in predicting response to TPO receptor agonists. Am. J. Hematol. 2013; 88 (12): 1041–1044. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23562.
  37. Nurden A.T., Viallard J.F., Nurden P. et al. New generation drags that stimulate platelet production in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Lancet. 2009; 373 (9674): 1562–1569. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60255-5.
  38. Kuter D.J., Bussel J.B., Lyons R.M. et al. Efficacy of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2008; 371 (9610): 395–403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60203-2.
  39. Cheng G., Saleh M.N., Marcher C. et al. Eltrombopag for management of chronic immune thrombocytopenia (RAISE): a 6-month, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet. 2011; 377 (9763): 393–402. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60959-2.
  40. Kuter D.J., Rummel M., Boccia R. et al. Romiplostim or standard of care in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 363 (20): 1889–1899. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002625.
  41. Wasser J., Boccia R., Lyons R.M. Use of rituximab in a study comparing the thrombopoietin mimetic romiplostim with standard of care (SOC) in a patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). Blood. 2011; 118 (21): 3282.
  42. Janssens A., Rodeghiero F., Anderson D. et al. Changes in bone marrow morphology in adults receiving romiplostim for the treatment of thrombocytopenia associated with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Ann. Hematol. 2016; 95 (7): 1077–1087. doi: 10.1007/s00277-016-2682-2.
  43. Brynes R.K., Orazi A., Theodore D. et al. Evaluation of bone marrow reticulin in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia treated with eltrombopag: Data from the EXTEND study. Am. J. Hematol. 2015; 90 (7): 598–601. doi: 10.1002/ajh.24011.
  44. Gernsheimer T.B., George J.N., Aledort L.M. et al. Evaluation of bleeding and thrombotic events during long-term use of romiplostim in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). J. Thromb. Haemost. 2010; 8 (6): 1372–1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03830.
  45. González-López T.J., Pascual C., Álvarez-Román M.T. et al. Successful discontinuation of eltrombopag after complete remission in patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia. Am. J. Hematol. 2015; 90 (3): e40–e43. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23900.
  46. Marshall A.L., Scarpone R., De Greef M. et al. Remissions after long-term use of romiplostim for immune thrombocytopenia. Haematologica. 2016; 101 (12): e476–e478. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2016.151886.
  47. Newland A., Godeau B., Priego V. et al. Remission and platelet responses with romiplostim in primary immune thrombocytopenia: final results from a phase 2 study. Br. J. Haematol. 2016; 172 (2): 262–273. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13827.
  48. Mazza P., Minoia C., Melpignano A. et al. The use of thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs) in immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a «real life» retrospective multicenter experience of the Rete Ematologica Pugliese (REP). Ann. Hematol. 2016; 95 (2): 239–244. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2556.
  49. González-López T.J., Alvarez-Román M.T., Pascual C. et al. Eltrombopag safety and efficacy for primary chronic immune thrombocytopenia in clinical practice. Eur. J. Haematol. 2016; 97 (3): 297–302. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12725.
  50. Zotova I.I., Gritsaev S.V., Shilova E.R. et al. Thrombopoietin receptor agonists in treatment of idiopathic thrompocytopenic purpura (primary immune thrombocytopenia): Efficacy and safety in everyday clinical practice. Klinicheskaya Onkogematologiya. 2017; 10 (1): 93–100. (In Russ.)

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

© 2018 Zotova I.I., Gritsaev S.V.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed
under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





Согласие на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика»

1. Я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных»), осуществляя использование сайта https://journals.rcsi.science/ (далее – «Сайт»), подтверждая свою полную дееспособность даю согласие на обработку персональных данных с использованием средств автоматизации Оператору - федеральному государственному бюджетному учреждению «Российский центр научной информации» (РЦНИ), далее – «Оператор», расположенному по адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А, со следующими условиями.

2. Категории обрабатываемых данных: файлы «cookies» (куки-файлы). Файлы «cookie» – это небольшой текстовый файл, который веб-сервер может хранить в браузере Пользователя. Данные файлы веб-сервер загружает на устройство Пользователя при посещении им Сайта. При каждом следующем посещении Пользователем Сайта «cookie» файлы отправляются на Сайт Оператора. Данные файлы позволяют Сайту распознавать устройство Пользователя. Содержимое такого файла может как относиться, так и не относиться к персональным данным, в зависимости от того, содержит ли такой файл персональные данные или содержит обезличенные технические данные.

3. Цель обработки персональных данных: анализ пользовательской активности с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика».

4. Категории субъектов персональных данных: все Пользователи Сайта, которые дали согласие на обработку файлов «cookie».

5. Способы обработки: сбор, запись, систематизация, накопление, хранение, уточнение (обновление, изменение), извлечение, использование, передача (доступ, предоставление), блокирование, удаление, уничтожение персональных данных.

6. Срок обработки и хранения: до получения от Субъекта персональных данных требования о прекращении обработки/отзыва согласия.

7. Способ отзыва: заявление об отзыве в письменном виде путём его направления на адрес электронной почты Оператора: info@rcsi.science или путем письменного обращения по юридическому адресу: 119991, г. Москва, Ленинский просп., д.32А

8. Субъект персональных данных вправе запретить своему оборудованию прием этих данных или ограничить прием этих данных. При отказе от получения таких данных или при ограничении приема данных некоторые функции Сайта могут работать некорректно. Субъект персональных данных обязуется сам настроить свое оборудование таким способом, чтобы оно обеспечивало адекватный его желаниям режим работы и уровень защиты данных файлов «cookie», Оператор не предоставляет технологических и правовых консультаций на темы подобного характера.

9. Порядок уничтожения персональных данных при достижении цели их обработки или при наступлении иных законных оснований определяется Оператором в соответствии с законодательством Российской Федерации.

10. Я согласен/согласна квалифицировать в качестве своей простой электронной подписи под настоящим Согласием и под Политикой обработки персональных данных выполнение мною следующего действия на сайте: https://journals.rcsi.science/ нажатие мною на интерфейсе с текстом: «Сайт использует сервис «Яндекс.Метрика» (который использует файлы «cookie») на элемент с текстом «Принять и продолжить».