Rationale for moderately radical preparation of mouth cavity of elderly patients for implant prosthetics

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: When preparing the oral cavity for implant prosthetics, a conservative, sparing method is traditionally used. This practice (‘preserve what remained’), on the one hand, seems logical, on the other hand, more radical methods exist. The duality of approaches creates difficulties in selection of the optimal treatment strategy.

AIM: To substantiate the reasonability of a radical approach to oral cavity sanation in elderly and senile individuals before implant prosthetics.

METHODS: The study involved 109 elderly and senile individuals. Two groups were formed: group 1 (the study group) included patients with partial tooth loss, a ‘decompensated dentition’, and conservative, sparing preparation for prosthetics (n=49), group 2 included patients with complete tooth loss and radical oral cavity sanation (n=57). Clinical and paraclinical (cone-beam computed tomography, orthopantomography, implant mobility testing, and clinical and sociological) research methods were used.

RESULTS: The results confirmed the superiority of reported anatomical, physiological and statistical parameters in patients of group 2. In addition, the prevention of complications, long-term longevity of implants and implant prostheses, fulfillment of guaranteed long-term treatment periods, significant reduction of financial and time expenditures were substantiated. Furthermore, the importance of improving the oral health of elderly and senile already comorbid and polymorbid patients by eliminating foci of periodontal and anaerobic microflora should be added.

CONCLUSION: The conducted study made it possible to substantiate the rationality of radical approach to preparing the oral cavity of elderly and senile patients for implant prosthetics.

About the authors

Javid Z. Tagizade

Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

Email: Javidik.jt@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2143-505X
SPIN-code: 9311-7763
Russian Federation, Veliky Novgorod

Vladimir N. Trezubov

Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Email: trezubovvn@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0532-5632
SPIN-code: 2588-7283

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Roman A. Rozov

Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Author for correspondence.
Email: dds.rozov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5804-9497
SPIN-code: 1173-7870

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Assistant Professor

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

Vladimir D. Vagner

Ryazan State Medical University; Russian University of Medicine

Email: vagnerstar@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9136-9289
SPIN-code: 2587-3559

MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor

Russian Federation, Ryazan, Moscow

Maxim L. Mishnev

Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

Email: m1shnev@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2664-0674
SPIN-code: 7120-5698

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Veliky Novgorod

Yuriy V. Parshin

Academician I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Email: y.v.parshin@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7075-2377
SPIN-code: 8716-1683

MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)

Russian Federation, Saint Petersburg

References

  1. Kulakov AA, Andreeva SN. Organizational and legal aspects of implant dentistry according to the analysis of judicial practice. Stomatology. 2019;98(1):4–10. doi: 10.17116/stomat2019980114 EDN: YYVQWD
  2. Olesova VN, Bronshteĭn DA, Uzunjan NA, et al. Biomechanics of implant retained fixed prosthesis in patient with edentulous upper jaw. Stomatology. 2018;97(6):53–56. doi: 10.17116/stomat20189706153 EDN: VPJNHR
  3. French D, Grandin HM, Ofec R. Retrospective cohort study of 4,591 dental implants: Analysis of risk indicators for bone loss and prevalence of periimplant mucositis and periimplantitis. J Periodontol. 2019;90(7):691–700. doi: 10.1002/jper.18-0236
  4. Bayrikov IM, Monakov DV, Monakov VA, et al. To assess the stability and osseointegration of dental endosseous-subperiosteal implant with a through porosity in the conditions of atrophy of the bone tissue using the apparatus Periotest S. Clinical Dentistry (Russia). 2022;25(3):20–24. doi: 10.37988/1811-153X_2022_3_20 EDN: SLLWNC
  5. Lepilin AV, Zakharova NB, Shalina MY, et al. Prophylaxis of inflammatory complications after an immediate dental implant surgery. Parodontologiya. 2019;24(3):236–242. doi: 10.33925/1683-3759-2019-24-3-236-242 EDN: SOFPVB
  6. De Oliveira-Neto OB, Lemos CA, Barbosa FT, et al. Immediate dental implants placed into infected sites present a higher risk of failure than immediate dental implants placed into non-infected sites: systematic review and meta-analyses. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019;24(4):518–528. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22954
  7. Rozov RA, Trezubov VN, Gerasimov AB, Azarin GS. A prospective single-cohort study of implant-supported full-arch metal-ceramic prosthesis with gold-platinum alloy framework for treatment edentulous mandible in elderly patients: 15-year report. Stomatology. 2023;102(6):22–27. doi: 10.17116/stomat202310206122 EDN: UKHQWW
  8. Rozov RA, Higuchi KW, Brunski J, et al. 3D finite element analysis of the dental implant loss effect on the stress distribution in the mandibular implant-supported prosthesis. Russian Journal of Biomechanics. 2023; 27(3):24–35. doi: 10.15593/RZhBiomech/2023.3.02 EDN: JKBLHW
  9. Trezubov VN, Rozov RA. Decompensated (compromised) dentition (philosophical essay). Parodontologiya. 2020;25(2):134–139. doi: 10.33925/1683-3759-2020-25-2-134-139 EDN: PFBJXS
  10. Trezubov VN, Rozov RA, Sapronova ON, et al. Otsenka kachestva zubnykh i chelyustnykh protezov (programma dlya EVM). Institut Stomatologii. 2006;(3):32–33. (In Russ.) EDN: MWGTMX
  11. Computer program No. 2023610578. 11.01.2023. Byul. No. 1. Mishnyov ML, Parshin YuV, Trezubov VN. Avtomatizirovannaya portativnaya vizual'no-analogovaya shkala (VASH) “PARMIT”. Available from: https://www.fips.ru/publication-web/publications/document?lang=ru&type=doc&tab=PrEVM&id=05930E49-4723-49F3-93A8-B4D06D5D8CC1 (In Russ.) EDN: ITQDJA
  12. Computer program No. 2022666160. 25.08.2022. Byul. No. 9. Mishnyov ML, Trezubov VN, Rozov RA, et al. Kompyuternaya programma skriningovoy otsenki “TREMISH” dlya planirovaniya podgotovki polosti rta pozhilykh patsiyentov k implantatsionnomu protezirovaniyu. Available from: https://www.fips.ru/publication-web/publications/document?type=doc&tab=PrEVM&id=72015677-E7CF-4A87-8605-00036D1B1F16 (In Russ.) EDN: LHHZKM
  13. Orentlicher G, Horowitz А, Korben L. Computer-Guided Dental Implant Treatment of Complete Arch Resto Ration of Edentulous and Terminal Dentition Patients. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2019;31(3):399–426. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.004
  14. Cortellini P, Stalpers G, Mollo A, Tonetti MS. Periodontal regeneration versus extraction and dental implant or prosthetic replacement of teeth severely compromised by attachment loss to the apex: a randomized controlled clinical trial reporting 10-year outcomes, survival analysis and mean cumulative cost of recurrence. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(6):768–776. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13289 EDN: CRHVTD
  15. Junge T, Topoli H, Eickholz P, Petsos H. Retrospective long-term analyses of tooth loss over 20 years in specialists practice setting: periodontally health/gingivitis and compromised patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(10):1356–1366. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13520 EDN: DSPLET
  16. Rozov RA, Trezubov VN, Vagner VD, et al. Experimentally Justified Choice of Optimal Antiseptic Solution for Hygienic Care of Oral Cavity and Dentures. I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald. 2022;30(4):539–546. doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ108653 EDN: FQQHMM
  17. Schou S. Implant treatment in periodontitis-susceptible patients: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35 Suppl:9–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01830.x
  18. Mengel R, Wendt J, Peleska B. Prosthodontic Treatment Outcomes in Periodontally Compromised Patients: A 6- to 20-Year Long-Term Cohort Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(2):153–161. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5917
  19. Menini M, Setti P, Pera P, et al. Peri-implant Tissue Health and Bone Resorption in Patients with immediately loaded, implant-supported, full-arch Prostheses. Int J Prosthodont. 2018;31(4):327–333. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5567
  20. Villa R, Rangert B.Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: a pilot study. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(6 Suppl):S96–S108. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(07)60013-4 Erratum in: J Prosthet Dent. 2008;99(3):167.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Eco-Vector

License URL: https://eco-vector.com/for_authors.php#07
 


Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).