Email this article Morpho-functional assessment of different methods of separation of the abdominal wall at increasing abdominal cavity
- Authors: Shapovalyants S.G.1, Mikhalev A.I.1, Mikhaleva L.M.1, Dzavaryan T.G.1, Pulatov M.M.1
-
Affiliations:
- Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
- Issue: Vol 25, No 3 (2017)
- Pages: 443-452
- Section: Surgery
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/pavlovj/article/view/7105
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.23888/PAVLOVJ20173443-452
- ID: 7105
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of different methods of anterior abdominal wall separation on the increasion of the abdominal cavity volume (ACV) for the prevention of compartment sindrome. The effect of Novitsky posterior separation (Transversus Abdominis Release – TAR), Ramirez anterior separation and Ramirez anterior separation with the mobilization of posterior wall rectus sheath (R+MPRS) on increase ACV was studied. The study was conducted on autopsy materials of 30 non-fixed corpses. In the first part of investigation the results of Novitsky operation have been studied (n=10), in the second part – of Ramirez operation (n=10) and in the third part – R+MPRS (n=10). The ACV have been determined before and after surgery and the degree of it’s increasion after each operation have been counted. In Ramiraz's separation the average of ACV before the operation was 3.2±0.2 L, after the operation – 4.06±0.2 L with an average increasion in volume of 27.8±2.6%. In Novitsky operation the average of ACV before the operation was 3.1±0.1 L, after the operation – 3.9±0.1 L, with an average increasion of 24.2±1.7%. In Ramiraz + MPRS the average of ACV before the operation was 3.1±0.08 L, after the operation – 4.7±0.22 L with an average increasion of 49.8±4.6%. The study revealed different effects of the three types seperation of the abdominal wall on increasion the ACV. The operation of Ramiraz+ MPRS has the greatest effect on the increasion the ACV (49.8±4.6). The results were successfully used in the choice of the type of operation in 8 patients with large ventral hernias.
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
S. G. Shapovalyants
Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
Author for correspondence.
Email: sgs31@mail.ru
д.м.н., профессор, зав. кафедрой госпитальной хирургии №2
Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997A. I. Mikhalev
Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
Email: rsmu1985@gmail.ru
д.м.н., проф., профессор кафедры госпитальной хирургии №2
Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997L. M. Mikhaleva
Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
Email: mikhalevalm@yandex.ru
д.м.н., проф., академик РАЕ, зав. патологоанатомическим отделением
Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997T. G. Dzavaryan
Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
Email: tdzavaryan@yandex.ru
аспирант кафедры госпитальной хирургии
Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997M. M. Pulatov
Russian National Research Medical University N.I. Pirogov
Email: dr.makhmud@gmail.com
ординатор кафедры госпитальной хирургии
Russian Federation, 1, Ostrovityanova street, Moscow, 117997References
- Kingsnorth A. The management of incisional hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006; 88 (3): 252-60.
- Sanders DL, Kingsnorth AN. The modern management of incisional hernias. British med-ical journal. 2012; 344 (9): 2843.
- Egiev VN. Nenatyazhnaya gernio-plastika [Non-tension hernioplasty]. Moscow: Medpraktika, 2002. 120 р. (in Russian)
- Tarasenko SV, Zaitsev OV, Ahme-dov ShI. Okkul'tnye gryzhi – preimushchestvo lapa-roskopicheskoj gernioplastiki (TARR) [Occult hernia – the advantage of laparoscopic hernioplasty (TARR)]. Nauka molodykh (Eru-ditio juvenium) [Science of young (Eruditio Juvenium)]. 2015; 1: 70-2. (in Russian)
- Arnaud JP. Surgical treatment of postoperative Incisional hernias by intraperitoneal inser-tion of Dacron mesh and an aponeurotic graft. Archives of surgery. 1999; 134: 1260-2.
- Ponomareva YuV, Belokonev VI, Volova LT, Gulyaev MG. Morfologicheskie osnovyi prichin retsidivov u bolnyih s posleoperatsionnoy ventralnoy gryizhey [Morphological bases of the causes of relapse in patients with postoperative ventral hernia]. Fundamentalnyie issledovaniya [Fundamental Research]. 2013; 9: 263-6. (in Russian)
- Moreno IG. Eventracion cronica gigante preparada con neumoperitoneo y operada. In-forme preliminar. Buenos Aires: XXII Congreso Arhentino Cirurgia Chronic eventrations and large hernias: preoperative treatment by progressive pneumoperitoneum – original procedure. Sur-gery. 1940; 22: 945-53.
- Tanaka EY, Yoo JH, Rodrigues Jr. AJ, Utiyama EM, Birolini D, Rasslan S. A computer-ized tomography scan method for calculating the hernia sac and abdominal cavity volume in com-plex large incisional hernia with loss of domain. Hernia. 2010; 14: 63-9.
- Burch JM, Moore EE, Moore FA, Franciose R. The abdominal compartment syndrome. The Surgical clinics of North America. 1996; 76 (4): 833-42.
- Eriksson A, Rosenberg J, Bisgaard T. Surgical treatment for giant incisional hernia: a qualitative systematic review. Hernia. 2014; 18 (1): 31-8.
- Ennis LS, Young JS, Gampper TJ, Drake DB. The “open–book” variation of component separation for repair of massive midline abdominal wall hernia. The American surgeon. 2003; 69 (9): 733-42.
- Leonchenko SV. Sposob preperito-nealnogo protezirovaniia zadnei poverkhnosti pered-nei briushnoi stenki u bolnykh s ushchemlennymi gryzhami pakhovo-bedrennoi oblasti [The meth-od of preperitoneal prosthetics of the posterior surface of the anterior abdominal wall in patients with strangulated hernia of the inguinal and femoral region]. Ros-sijskij mediko-biologicheskij vestnik imeni aka-demika I.P. Pavlov [I.P. Pavlov Russian Medical Biological Herald]. 2009; 2: 112-5. (in Russian)
- Carbonell AM, Cobb WS, Chen SM. Posterior Component separation during retromus-cular hernia repair. Hernia. 2008; 12 (4): 359-62.
- Khripun AI, Vladmirov VG, Zarinskaya SA, Perevezentsev I Iu, Makhuova GB. Ek-sperimentalnoe modelirovanie vnutri-bryushnoy gipertenzii [Experimental modeling of intraperito-neal hypertension]. Biulleten VSNTS SO RAMN [Bulletin of the All-Union Scientific Center of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences]. 2010; 3: 285-8. (in Russian)
- Saulis AS, Dumanian GA. Periumbilical rectus abdominis perforator preservation signif-icantly reduces superficial wound complications in “separation of parts” hernia repairs. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2002; 109 (7): 2275-80.
- Ramirez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of ab-dominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 1990; 86 (3): 519-26.
- Bogetti P, Boriani F, Gravante G, Milanese A, Ferrando PM, Baglioni E. A retrospec-tive study on mesh repair alone vs. mesh repair plus pedicle flap for large incisional hernias. Euro-pean review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2012; 16 (13): 1847-52.
- Shell DH, de la Torre J, Andrades P, Vasconez LO. Open repair of ventral incisional hernias. The Surgical clinics of North America. 2008; 88: 61-83.
- Heller L, McNichols CH, Ramirez OM. Component separations. Seminars in plastic surgery. 2012; 26 (1): 25-8.
- De Vries Reilingh TS. Reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects: ‘components separation technique’ and prosthetic repair. The Netherlands. Enschede: Gildeprint BV; 2007. 131 р.
- Lowe JB, Garza JR, Bowman JL, Rohrich RJ, Strodel WE Endoscopically assisted “components separation” for closure of abdominal wall defects. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2000; 105 (2): 720-9.
- Novitsky YW, Elliott HL, Orenstein SB, Rosen MJ. Transversus abdominis muscle re-lease: a novel approach to posterior component separation during complex abdominal wall recon-struction. American journal of surgery. 2012; 204 (5): 709-16.
Supplementary files
