Russian localization and validation of the BRACE QUESTIONNAIRE
- Authors: Lein G.A.1, Pavlov I.V.2, Demchenko M.O.1, Zaripova A.V.1, Berezneva O.V.1, Maklakova T.Y.2
-
Affiliations:
- Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
- North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
- Issue: Vol 11, No 2 (2023)
- Pages: 139-148
- Section: Clinical studies
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/turner/article/view/264668
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/PTORS322807
- ID: 264668
Cite item
Abstract
BACKGROUND: According to the literature, the Greek questionnaire on the study of the quality of life of children and adolescents undergoing brace treatment (BRACE questionnaire, abbreviated as BrQ) is informative and reliable, which is confirmed by its validation in different countries. This necessitates the creation of an adopted Russian version and its validation.
AIM: To perform Russian localization and validation of the Greek questionnaire on the study of the quality of life of children and adolescents undergoing brace treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Russian localization and validation of the Russian version of the questionnaire on braces (Ru-BrQ) was carried out in several stages: direct and reverse translations, examination of the questionnaire, formation of a preliminary version, pilot testing of 104 patients with idiopathic scoliosis on brace treatment, development of the final version, reliability study using the evaluation of Cronbach’s alpha criterion and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and provision of the final version.
RESULTS: According to the indicators of the overall Ru-BrQ score, 0% of patients scored at the “floor” and “ceiling” levels. The average quality of life scores according to Ru-BrQ and in the retest were 72 ± 9.2 and 72.4 ± 9.0 points, respectively. According to the ICC indicator, domains such as “general health,” “self-esteem and aesthetics,” “vitality,” and “social functioning” showed excellent reliability (>0.9). “Physical functioning” and “school activity” demonstrated good reliability (0.75–0.9). “Emotional functioning” and “body pain” demonstrated moderate reliability (0.5–0.75). The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient showed that except for the domains “emotional functioning” and “body pain,” where good internal consistency was determined (≥0.8), all other domains confirmed excellent internal consistency (≥0.9). The Pearson correlation coefficient (index 0.67) revealed a noticeable correlation between Ru-BrQ and the Russian version of SRS-22.
CONCLUSIONS: The Russian version is a reliable questionnaire for the study of the quality of life of children and adolescents undergoing brace treatment, comparable with the original Greek version of BrQ, and can be recommended for use in practical and scientific activities to assess the effect of a torso brace on the quality of life in children and adolescents.
Keywords
Full Text
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##About the authors
Grigory A. Lein
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: lein@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7904-8688
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgIvan V. Pavlov
North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
Email: pavlov@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-4486-7840
MD, PhD, Cand. Sci. (Med.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgMikhail O. Demchenko
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: dmo@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8422-8779
PhD, Cand. Sci. (Econom.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgArina V. Zaripova
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: behtereva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0003-5579-4362
psychologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgOlesya V. Berezneva
Prosthetic and Orthopedic Center “Scoliologic.ru”
Email: o.berezneva@scoliologic.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0000-2779-4443
psychologist
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgTaisiya Yu. Maklakova
North-West Scientific-Practical Center of Rehabilitation and Prosthetics “Ortetika”
Author for correspondence.
Email: m_t_y@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0009-0001-7196-9738
PhD, Cand. Sci. (Psychol.)
Russian Federation, Saint PetersburgReferences
- Misterska E, Glowacki M, Latuszewska J, et al. Perception of stress level, trunk appearance, body function and mental health in females with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated conservatively: a longitudinal analysis. Quality of Life Research. 2013;22(7):1633–1645. doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0316-2
- Piantoni L, Tello CA, Remondino RG, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in bracing treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2018;13(1). doi: 10.1186/s13013-018-0172-0
- Zimon M, Matusik E, Kapustka B, et al. Conservative management strategies and stress level in children and adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Psychiatria Polska. 2018;52(2):355–369. doi: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/68744
- Cheung PWH., Wong CKH., Cheung JPY. An insight into the health-related quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who are braced, observed, and previously braced. Spine. 2019;44(10):E596–E605. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002918
- Lin T, Meng Y, Ji Z, et al. Extent of depression in juvenile and adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis during treatment with braces. World Neurosurgery. 2019;125:e326–e335. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.095
- Pezham H, Babaee T, Bagheripour B, et al. Stress level and quality of life of adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis during brace treatment. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2022;68(2):231–237. doi: 10.5606/tftrd.2022.8467
- Asada T, Kotani T, Sunami T, et al. What factor induces stress in patients with AIS under brace treatment? Analysis of a specific factor using exploratory factor analysis. J Orthop Sci. 2021;26(6):999–1003. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.10.024
- Wang H, Tetteroo D, Arts Ch, et al. Quality of life of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients under brace. Qual Life Res. 2021;30(3):703–711. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02671-7
- Novik AA, Ionova TI. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine. Moscow: OLMAPRESS; 2002. (In Russ.)
- Novik AA, Ionova TI. Issledovanie kachestva zhizni v pediatrii. Moscow: RAEN; 2013. (In Russ.)
- Gubin AV, Prudnikova OG, Kamysheva VV, et al. Clinical testing of the russian version of the srs-22 questionnaire for adult scoliosis patients. Spine Surgery. 2017;14(2):31–40. (In Russ.) doi: 10.14531/ss2017.2.31-40
- Vasiliadis E, Grivas TB, Gkoltsiou K. Development and preliminary validation of Brace Questionnaire (BrQ): a new instrument for measuring quality of life of brace treated scoliotics. Scoliosis. 2006;1:7. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-7
- Kinel E, Kotwicki T, Podolska A, et al. Polish validation of Brace Questionnaire. European Spine Journal. 2012;21(8):1603–1608. doi: 10.1007/s00586-012-2188-0
- Aulisa AG, Guzzanti V, Galli M, et al. Validation of Italian version of brace questionnaire (BrQ). Scoliosis. 2013;8(1):13. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-8-13
- Deceuninck J, Tirat-Herbert A, Rodriguez Martinez N, et al. French validation of the Brace Questionnaire (BrQ). Scoliosis Spinal Disord. 2017;12(1):1–5. doi: 10.1186/s13013-017-0126-y
- Gur, G, Yakut Y, Grivas T. The Turkish version of the Brace Questionnaire in brace-treated adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42(2):129–135. doi: 10.1177/0309364617690393
- Lim JM, Goh TS, Shin JK, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the Brace Questionnaire. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(6):678–681. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1501464
- Jafarian FS, Sadeghi-Demneh E. Validity and reliability of the Persian version of brace questionnaire for assessing the quality of life Life in subjects with scoliosis. Arch Rehabil. 2020;21(1):74–87. doi: 10.32598/RJ.21.1.2983.1
- Zhang X, Wang D, Yao M, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Brace Questionnaire for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(33). doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026965
- Yi H, Chen H, Wang X, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Chinese version of the Brace Questionnaire. Front Pediatr. 2022;9. DOI: 10.3389 /fped.2021.763811
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of crosscultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186–3191. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
- Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;16:297–334.
- Nasledov AD. IBM SP SS Statistics 20 i AMOS: professional’nyi statisticheskii analiz dannykh. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2013.
- Chaddock RE. Principles and methods of statistics. Boston, New York, 1925.
- Rigo M, Villagrasa M., Gallo D. A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability. Scoliosis. 2010:5(1). doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-5-1
Supplementary files
