Development of a Ni–Pd/CeZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst for the effective conversion of methane into hydrogen-containing gas
- Authors: Kerzhentsev M.A.1, Matus E.V.1, Rundau I.A.1,2, Kuznetsov V.V.1, Ismagilov I.Z.1, Ushakov V.A.1, Yashnik S.A.1, Ismagilov Z.R.1,3
-
Affiliations:
- Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
- Novosibirsk State Technical University
- Institute of Coal Chemistry and Chemical Materials Science, Siberian Branch
- Issue: Vol 58, No 5 (2017)
- Pages: 601-609
- Section: Article
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0023-1584/article/view/163290
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S002315841705010X
- ID: 163290
Cite item
Abstract
The effects of the Pd content (0–1 wt %) and the synthesis method (joint impregnation with Ni + Pd and Pd/Ni or Ni/Pd sequential impregnation) on the physicochemical and catalytic properties of Ni–Pd/CeZrO2/Al2O3 were studied in order to develop an efficient catalyst for the conversion of methane into hydrogen-containing gas. It was shown that variation in the palladium content and a change in the method used for the introduction of an active constituent into the support matrix make it possible to regulate the redox properties of nickel cations but do not affect the size of NiO particles (14.0 ± 0.5 nm) and the phase composition of the catalyst ((γ + δ)-Al2O3, CeZrO2 solid solution, and NiO). It was established that the activity of Ni–Pd catalysts in the reaction of autothermal methane reforming depends on the method of synthesis and increases in the following order: Ni + Pd < Ni/Pd < Pd/Ni. It was found that, as the Pd content of the Ni–Pd/CeZrO2/Al2O3 catalyst was decreased from 1 to 0.05 wt %, the ability for self-activation, high activity, and operational stability of the catalyst under the conditions of autothermal methane reforming remained unaffected: at 850°C, the yield of hydrogen was ~70% at a methane conversion of ~100% during a 24-h reaction.
Keywords
About the authors
M. A. Kerzhentsev
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
E. V. Matus
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Author for correspondence.
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
I. A. Rundau
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch; Novosibirsk State Technical University
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Novosibirsk, 630073
V. V. Kuznetsov
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
I. Z. Ismagilov
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
V. A. Ushakov
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
S. A. Yashnik
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090
Z. R. Ismagilov
Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, Siberian Branch; Institute of Coal Chemistry and Chemical Materials Science, Siberian Branch
Email: matus@catalysis.ru
Russian Federation, Novosibirsk, 630090; Kemerovo, 650000
Supplementary files
