Secondary structure of Aβ(1–16) complexes with zinc: A study in the gas phase using deuterium/hydrogen exchange and ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry
- Authors: Kostyukevich Y.I.1,2, Kononikhin A.S.1,3,4, Indeykina M.I.3, Popov I.A.1,3, Bocharov K.V.1,4, Spassky A.I.3,4, Kozin S.A.5, Makarov A.A.5, Nikolaev E.N.1,2,3,4
-
Affiliations:
- Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University)
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
- Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics
- Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
- Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
- Issue: Vol 51, No 4 (2017)
- Pages: 627-632
- Section: Structural and Functional Analysis of Biopolymers and Their Complexes
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0026-8933/article/view/163193
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893317030104
- ID: 163193
Cite item
Abstract
Complexes of peptide fragment 1–16 of beta-amyloid with transition metals play an important role in the development of a broad class of neurodegenerative diseases, which determines the interest in investigating the structures of these complexes. In this work, we have applied the method of the deuterium/hydrogen exchange in combination with ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry to study conformational changes in (1–16) beta-amyloid peptide induced by binding of zinc(II) atoms. The efficiency of the deuterium/hydrogen exchange depended on the number of zinc atoms bound to the peptide and on the temperature of the ionization source region. Deuterium/hydrogen exchange reactions have been performed directly in the ionization source. The number of exchanges decreased considerably with an increasing numbers of zinc atoms. The relationship has been described with a damped exponential curve, which indicated that the binding of zinc atoms altered the conformation of the peptide ion by making it less open, which limits the access to inner areas of the molecule.
About the authors
Yu. I. Kostyukevich
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University); Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Dolgprudny, Moscow oblast, 141701; Moscow, 143026
A. S. Kononikhin
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University); Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics; Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
Author for correspondence.
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Dolgprudny, Moscow oblast, 141701; Moscow, 119334; Moscow, 119334
M. I. Indeykina
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119334
I. A. Popov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University); Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Dolgprudny, Moscow oblast, 141701; Moscow, 119334
K. V. Bocharov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University); Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Dolgprudny, Moscow oblast, 141701; Moscow, 119334
A. I. Spassky
Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics; Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119334; Moscow, 119334
S. A. Kozin
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
A. A. Makarov
Engelhardt Institute of Molecular Biology
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow, 119991
E. N. Nikolaev
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University); Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology; Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics; Talrose Institute for Energy Problems of Chemical Physics
Email: alex.kononikhin@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Dolgprudny, Moscow oblast, 141701; Moscow, 143026; Moscow, 119334; Moscow, 119334
Supplementary files
