POST-CAPITALIST SOCIETY: NEO-FEUDAL OR PERSONALISTIC?
- Authors: DAVYDOV D.A1
-
Affiliations:
- Institute of Philosophy and Law of UB RAS
- Issue: No 11 (2025)
- Pages: 123-134
- Section: DISCISSION. POLEMICS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0132-1625/article/view/357831
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.7868/S3034577X25110105
- ID: 357831
Abstract
The article raises the topic of social transformations indicating the emergence of a post-capitalist society. Two opposing approaches to understanding the post-capitalist perspective are considered: versions of socialism or communism constructed by many left-wing theorists, on the one hand, and concepts of neo- or techno-feudalism, on the other. The article shows that both the optimism of the first approach and the pessimism of the second are not confirmed by the observed social dynamics. Post-capitalism may be understood as a gradual erasure of the differences between labor and capital – the personalization of production relations. Accordingly, a hypothesis is put forward that a post-capitalist society will be neither socialist nor neo-feudal, but personalistic. It is shown that today models of capital as self-increasing value, ensured by maximizing the appropriation of surplus labor, are gradually losing their significance. Using the example of the gig economy and the content creators economy, it is demonstrated how production relations can change as a personalistic society is emerging. Extremely pessimistic assessments do not correspond to sociological data: many people benefit from the fact that the economy is turning into a set of interactions between independent agents. Online platforms allow people to realize their personal potential and accumulate the key resource of the modern world – attention. However, in the new realities, there is a significant share of losers – those who are unable to profitably realize their personal potential and are forced to engage in routine and exhausting work. Personalization also means that success or failure will depend more on personal efforts, and responsibility for failures will be more difficult to shift to others.
About the authors
D. A DAVYDOV
Institute of Philosophy and Law of UB RAS
Author for correspondence.
Email: davydovdmitriy90@gmail.com
Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Senior Research Fellow Yekaterinburg, Russia
References
- Бузгалин А.В., Колганов А.И. Трансформации социальной структуры позднего капитализма: от пролетариата и буржуазии к прекариату и креативному классу? // Социологические исследования. 2019. № 1. С. 18–28. doi: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1.
- Горц А. (2010) Нематериальное. Знание, стоимость и капитал. М.: ВШЭ, 2010.
- Давыдов Д.А. Посткапитализм и рождение персоналиата. М.: Рипол Классик, 2021.
- Давыдов Д.А. Классовое господство в эпоху посткапитализма: Часть 2. Дистрибуция внимания // Социологические исследования. 2022. № 8. С. 136–146. doi: 10.31857/S013216250019871-1.
- Зубофф Ш. Эпоха надзорного капитализма. Битва за человеческое будущее на новых рубежах власти. М.: ИЭП им. Е.Т. Гайдара, 2021.
- Зубофф Ш. Надзорный капитализм или демократия? М.: Ин-т Гайдара, 2025.
- Колганов А.И. Диффузия социальной структуры современного капитализма как отражение формирования посткапиталистических тенденций // Социологические исследования. 2025. № 3. С. 132–144. doi: 10.31857/S0132162525030119.
- Латов Ю.В. (2024) Концепции и эмпирика формирования посткапиталистического «креативного класса» (класса профессионалов) // Вопросы политической экономии. 2024. № 38(2). С. 75–89. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12622452.
- Маркс К. Капитал. Т. 1 // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч. Т. 23. М.: Госполитиздат, 1960.
- Мартьянов В.С., Фишман Л.Г., Давыдов Д.А. Рентное общество: в тени труда, капитала и демократии. М.: ВШЭ, 2019.
- Мейсон П. Посткапитализм. Путеводитель по нашему будущему. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2016.
- Реквиц А. Общество сингулярностей. О структурных изменениях эпохи модерна. М., Б.: DirectMEDIA, 2022.
- Срничек Н., Уильямс А. Изобретая будущее. Посткапитализм и мир без труда. М.: STRELKA PRESS, 2019.
- Стэндинг Г. Прекариат. Новый опасный класс. М.: Ад Маргинем, 2014.
- Тощенко Ж.Т. Прекарная занятость – феномен современной экономики // Социологические исследования. 2020. № 8. С. 3–13. doi: 10.31857/S013216250009904-7.
- Хардт М., Негри А. Множество: война и демократия в эпоху Империи М.: Культур. революция, 2006.
- Bastani A. Fully Automated Luxury Communism. N. Y.: Verso, 2019.
- Dean J. Capital’s Grave: Neofeudalism and the New Class Struggle. N. Y.: Verso, 2025.
- Doctorow C., Giblin R. Chokepoint Capitalism: How Big Tech and Big Content Captured Creative Labor Markets and How We’ll Win Them Back. N. Y.: Beacon Press, 2022.
- Edeling A., Wies S. Embracing Entrepreneurship in the Creator Economy: The Rise of Creatreprene urs // International Journal of Research in Marketing. 2024. No. 41(3). P. 436–454. doi: 10.1016/j.ijresmar.2024.07.003.
- Gent C. Cyberboss: The Rise of Algorithmic Management and the New Struggle for Control at Work. N. Y.: Verso, 2024.
- Königs P. In Defense of ‘Surveillance Capitalism’ // Philosophy & Technology. 2024. Vol. 37. Art. 122. doi: 10.1007/s13347-024-00804-1.
- Shapiro B., Hitsch G.J., Tuchman A. TV Advertising Effectiveness and Profitability: Generalizable Results from 288 Brands // Econometrica. Journal of the Economic Society. 2021. No. 89(4). P. 1855–1879. doi: 10.3982/ECTA17674.
- Varoufakis Y. Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism. N. Y.: Melville House, 2024.
- Wark M. (2019) Capital Is Dead: Is This Something Worse? N. Y.: Verso, 2019.


