Critical Raw Material Extraction in the EU: Enhancing Competitiveness Amid Social Challenges

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The article provides insight into the paradox of the EU’s climate policy increasingly dependent on various raw materials while implementing its carbon neutrality goals to achieve energy resource self-sufficiency. The absence of domestic production of critical raw materials also undermines the region’s industrial competitiveness. In response, the EU has launched a new strategic initiative focused on securing critical raw material supply chains, including the revival of domestic mining activities. Despite the European Commission’s strong emphasis on the need for sustainable mining, meeting sustainability requirements is challenging in practice, and the extraction of critical materials is often associated with environmental damage and the disruption of local communities’ traditional habitats. Consequently, the development of new deposits is frequently delayed or obstructed by public opposition. The EU faces a complex dilemma, balancing the strategic supply security with the environmental concerns of affected local communities. By facilitating mining companies, the European Commission effectively legitimizes the circumvention of local resistance under the guise of public interest. Such manifestations are likely to fuel social tensions and Euroscepticism. An alternative pathway to domestic mining revival could involve prioritizing investment in recycling of critical raw materials. Such an approach, a slower but more sustainable one, aligns with the EU’s green transition and circular economy principles, while avoiding the social and environmental conflicts associated with new extraction initiatives.

About the authors

A. V Zimakov

Center for European Studies, Primakov Institute of World Economy and International Relations, Russian Academy of Sciences

Author for correspondence.
Email: andrey.zimakov@yandex.ru
Moscow, Russia

References

  1. Буторина О.В. (2024) Доклад Драги прерывает «обед молчания» ЕС. Аналитические записки Института Европы РАН. (Выпуск III) № 21. (№ 353). С. 43-51. DOI: http://doi.org/10.15211/analytics32120244351
  2. Европейский Союз в мировом хозяйстве: проблемы конкурентоспособности (2020) [Коллективная монография]. [Ред. Хесин Е.С. и др.] ИМЭМО РАН, Москва. 317 c. EDN: OXQLAB
  3. Зимаков А.В. (2018) Трансформация сетевой инфраструктуры в процессе экологизации энергетики ЕС. Мировая экономика и международные отношения. № 12. С. 46-54. doi: 10.20542/0131-2227-2018-62-12-46-54
  4. Кондратьев В.Б. (2022) Роль критически важных сырьевых материалов в условиях экономической неопределенности: опыт ЕС. Горная промышленность. № 4. С. 94-102. doi: 10.30686/1609-9192-2022-4-94-102.
  5. Котов А.В. (2024) Геоэкономический поворот: приоритеты политики новой Еврокомиссии. Современная Европа. № 5. С. 150-161. doi: 10.31857/S0201708324050127
  6. Лункин Р.Н. (2024) Факторы эрозии социальной модели Евросоюза. Современная Европа. № 7. С. 182-195. doi: 10.31857/S0201708324070155
  7. Canelas J., Carvalho A. (2023) The dark side of the energy transition: Extractivist violence, energy (in)justice and lithium mining in Portugal Energy Research & Social Science. 100, 103096. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103096
  8. Conde M. (2017) Resistance to Mining. Ecological Economics. No. 132. P. 80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.025
  9. Draghi M. et al. (2024) The future of European competitiveness - Part B. In-depth analysis and recommendations. 09.2024. 328 p.
  10. Dunlap A., Riquito M. (2023) Social warfare for lithium extraction? Open-pit lithium mining, counterinsurgency tactics and enforcing green extractivism in northern Portugal Energy Research & Social Science. 95, 102912. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2024.101498
  11. Eerola T. (2022) Corporate conduct, commodity and place: Ongoing mining and mineral exploration disputes in Finland and their implications for the social license to operate Resources Policy. 76, 102568. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102568
  12. Marmol C., Vaccaro I. (2020) New extractivism in European rural areas: how twentieth first century mining returned to disturb the rural transition. Geoforum. No. 116. P. 42-49. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2020.07.012
  13. Noever Castelos C. (2023) Mining out of the crisis? The role of the state in the expansion of the lithium frontier in Extremadura. The Extractive Industries and Society. No. 15, 101329. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101329
  14. Silva L., Sareen S. (2023) The calm before the storm? The making of a lithium frontier in transitioning Portugal. The Extractive Industries and Society. No. 15, 101308. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2023.101308
  15. Tansey R. (2023) Mining the depths of influence: How industry is forging the EU Critical Raw Materials Act Friends of the Earth Europe, July 2023. 35 p.
  16. Verweijen J., Dunlap A. (2021) The evolving techniques of social engineering of extraction: introducing political (re)actions ‘from above’ in large-scale mining and energy projects. Political Geography. No. 88, 102342. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102342
  17. Wolters L., Brusselaers J. (2024) The energy transition paradox: How lithium extraction puts pressure on environment, society, and politics. The Extractive Industries and Society. No. 19, 101498. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2024.101498
  18. Zografos C., Robbins P. (2020) Green sacrifice zones, or why a green new deal cannot ignore the cost shifts of just transitions. One Earth. No. 3(5). P. 543-546. doi: 10.1016/j.oneear.2020.10.012

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Russian Academy of Sciences

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).