Beyond the utopia. Two viewpoints on post-industrial labor
- Authors: Mezhuyev S.1
-
Affiliations:
- Stasis Center for Practical Philosophy, European University at St. Petersburg (EUSPb)
- Issue: Vol 34, No 2 (2024)
- Pages: 195-218
- Section: ILYENKOV
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/0869-5377/article/view/290218
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/0869-5377-2024-2-195-215
- ID: 290218
Cite item
Abstract
Statism and anarchism are a binary opposition that divides Marxists into two irreconcilable camps. This opposition was felt especially irresistible during the Iron Curtain. But already in the 1980s, both in Soviet philosophy and in European Marxism, the idea of dialogue and communication was actively gaining popularity, which called for compromise between opponents. And today, when the depoliticizing nature of late capitalism tendentiously smooth out “rough edges,” imposing radical centrism according to Anthony Gidden contradictions completely lose their fundamental importance. Within the framework of this hypothesis, the author constructs a theoretical dialogue between Italian post-Operatism (Antonio Negri, Paolo Virno, Franco Berardi, Maurizio Lazzarato, etc.) and domestic cultural philosophies (Vladimir Bibler, Vadim Mezhuyev, Nal Zlobin, Moses Kagan, Arnold Arnoldov, etc.), which are usually located at opposite poles of the political spectrum: post-operatives are known as anarchists, and cultural philosophers are more conservative and rather closer to the Social Democrats.
Both schools, referring to Karl Marx’s early works, analyze a new reality where the role of the main producer is occupied by a cultural person (scientist/artist) or a post-industrial worker. Both schools experience a certain affect of disappointment in radical political changes, and therefore see the main way to improve society no longer in political struggle, but in culture and communication. But while Italian Marxists urge to seek horizontal solidarity in subcultures, cultural philosophers take a position of power, developing pedagogical programs to make from proletariat the so-called cognitariat. The post-operatives label the new society emerging with the term “Empire.” The author of the article draws parallels between the new Empire and the late USSR, in which cultural philosophers worked. The article compares critical and apologetic views on post-Fordist production, as well as examines two proposed Enlightenment projects. The article attempts to demonstrate the theoretical similarities of the two directions and lays a certain foundation for their convergence with the aim of creating a dialectical theory that would combine both elements of pedagogy and a program of horizontal solidarity.
Full Text

About the authors
Stepan Mezhuyev
Stasis Center for Practical Philosophy, European University at St. Petersburg (EUSPb)
Author for correspondence.
Email: stepan931@gmail.com
Russian Federation, St. Petersburg
References
- Arendt H. Istoki totalitarizma [The Origins of Totalitarianism], Moscow, CenterCom, 1996.
- Arnoldov A. Obrazovanie — energiia dukhovnogo mira cheloveka [Education Is the Energy of the Human Spiritual World]. Gumanitarnoe prostranstvo [Humanity Space], 2012, no. 1, pp. 24–51.
- Arnoldov A. Teoriia kul’tury: istorizm i voprosy metodologii [Culture Theory: Historicism and Methodological Issues]. Kul’tura, chelovek i kartina mira [Culture, the Human Being, and the Picture of the World], Moscow, Nauka, 1987.
- Bell D. Griadushchee postindustrial’noe obshchestvo. Opyt sotsial’nogo prognozirovaniia [The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting], Moscow, Academia, 1999.
- Berardi F. After the Future (eds. G. Genosko, N. Thoburn), Oakland, CA, AK Press, 2011.
- Berardi F. Dusha za rabotoi. Ot otchuzhdeniia k avtonomii [L’anima al lavoro. Alienazione, estraneità, autonomia], Moscow, Grundrisse, 2019.
- Bibler V. Eshche odin dialog Monologista s Dialogikom [Another Dialog Between the Monologist and the Dialogician]. Arkhe [Arche], 1993, no. 1, pp. 9–70.
- Bibler V. O Markse — vser’ez (Razmyshleniia v kontse XX veka) [On Marx — Seriously (Reflections at the End of the XX Century)]. Polis. Political Studies, 1996, no. 1, pp. 119–128.
- Bibler V. Ot naukoucheniia — k logike kul’tury. Dva filosofskikh vvedeniia v dvadtsat’ pervyi vek [From Science Studies to the Logic of Culture. Two Philosophical Introductions to the Twenty-first Century], Moscow, Politizdat, 1990.
- Bibler V. Samostoian’e cheloveka. “Predmetnaia deiatel’nost’” v kontseptsii Marksa i samodeterminatsiia individa [The Self-determination of the Individual. “Object-oriented Activity” in Marx’s Concept and Self-determination of an Individual], Kemerovo, Alef, 1993.
- Bibler V. Shkola “dialoga kul’tur” [The School of the “Dialog of Cultures”]. Sovetskaia pedagogika [Soviet Pedagogy], 1988, no. 11, pp. 29–34.
- Federici S. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, Oakland, CA, AK Press, 2012.
- Gardiner M. Bakhtin and the “General Intellect”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2017, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 893–908.
- Graeber D. “The Sadness of Post-Workerism”, Revolutions in Reverse: Essays on Politics, Violence, Art, and the Imagination, N.Y., Autonomedia, 2012.
- Hardt M., Negri A. Imperiia [Empire], Moscow, Praxis, 2004.
- Hardt M., Negri A. Mnozhestvo: voina i demokratiia v epokhu imperii [Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire], Moscow, Kul’turnaia revoliutsiia [Cultural Revolution], 2006.
- Il’enkov E. Marx and the Western World. From the Marxist-Leninist Point of View (ed. N. Lobkowicz), London, University of Notre Dame Press, 1967.
- Ilyenkov E. Chto zhe takoe lichnost’? [So, What Is a Personality?]. S chego nachinaetsia lichnost’ [What Does the Personality Begin With], Moscow, Nauka, 1984, pp. 319–358.
- Ilyenkov E. Gegel’ i “otchuzhdenie” [Hegel and “Alienation”]. Filosofiia i kul’tura [Philosophy and Culture], Moscow, Politizdat, 1991.
- Kagan M. Globalizatsiia kul’turnykh protsessov: stanovlenie dialogicheskogo myshleniia [Globalization of Cultural Processes: The Formation of Dialogic Thinking]. Globalizatsiia: sinergeticheskii podkhod [Globalization: A Synergetic Approach], Moscow, RAPA, 2002.
- Khudik V. Lev Semenovich Vygotsky: vchera, segodnia, zavtra [Lev Semenovich Vygotsky: yesterday, today, tomorrow]. Pedagogic Correction Education Journal, 2015, no. 2 (2), pp. 98–104.
- Kristeva J. Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman. Critique, 1967, vol. 23, no. 239, pp. 438–465.
- Lazzarato M. Nematerial’nyi trud [Immaterial Labour]. Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal [Moscow Art Magazine], 2008, no. 69. Available at: https://moscowartmagazine.com/issue/23/article/369.
- Lazzarato M. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity, Los Angeles, Semiotext (e), 2014.
- Mareev S. Spinoza v sovetskoi filosofii [Spinoza in Soviet philosophy]. Logos (Russia), 2007, no. 2 (59), pp. 187–200.
- Marx K. Ekonomicheskie rukopisi 1857–1859 godov [Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie]. In: Marx K., Engels F. Sochineniia [Works], Moscow, Politizdat, 1969, vol. 46, pt. 2.
- Marx K. Grundrisse der. Kritik der Politischen Ökonomie Politische Ökonomie: Geschichte und Kritik, Hamburg, Europäische Verlagsanstalt, 1967.
- Mezhuev V. Sotsializm — prostranstvo kul’tury (Eshche raz o sotsialisticheskoi idee) [Socialism Is the Space of Culture (Once Again on the Socialist Idea)]. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2006, no. 3, pp. 82–92.
- Negri A. Deleuze/Spinoza. Un devenir-politique. Archives de Philosophie, 2021, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 51–63.
- Negri A. Marx Beyond Marx: Working Notes on the Grundrisse, London, Red Notes, 1988.
- Negri A. Some Thoughts on the Use of Dialectics. African Yearbook of Rhetoric, 2012, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 2–11.
- Negri A., Bosteels B. An Italian Rupture: Production Against Development. Diacritics, 2009, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 21–27.
- Negri A., Hardt M. Commonwealth, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 2011.
- Penzin A. The Soviets of the Multitude: On Collectivity and Collective Work: An Interview With Paolo Virno. Mediations, 2010, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 81–92.
- Tinus N. Protsess i otnoshenie: istoki avtonomistskoi teorii individuatsii [Process and Relation: Origins of the Autonomist Theory of Individuation]. Politeia, 2021, no. 1 (100), pp. 44–59.
- Toffler A. Metamorfozy vlasti [Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century], Moscow, AST, 2003.
- Virno P. “General Intellect” in Lessico Postfordista, Milano, Feltrinelli, 2001.
- Virno P. Grammatika mnozhestva. K analizu form sovremennoi zhizni [Grammatica della moltitudine. Per una analisi delle forme di vita contemporanee], Moscow, Ad Marginem, 2013.
- Yurchak A. Eto bylo navsegda, poka ne konchilos’. Poslednee sovetskoe pokolenie [Everything Was Forever, Until It Was No More: The Last Soviet Generation], Moscow, NLO, 2014.
- Zlobin N. Kul’tura i obshchestvennyi progress [Culture and Social Progress], Moscow, Nauka, 1980.
Supplementary files
