Art and philosophy: overcoming toxic codependency. A discussion

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

The relationship between art and philosophy represents a complex and multifaceted dynamic in which both domains interact, complement, and simultaneously constrain each other. Artists and philosophers utilize ideas and concepts to enrich their practices, yet this interaction often proves to be tense. Philosophical texts and theories become the foundation for artistic works, while art, in turn, serves as a platform for testing abstract ideas.

Contemporary art faces challenges of primitivisation, where ecological, moral, and political themes prevail over purely creative aspects. This shift in paradigm leads artists to increasingly explore themes of transhumanism, posthumanism, and cyberfeminism. The interplay between philosophy and art opens new perspectives but also demands a rethinking of their interaction. The discussants emphasize the need to transition from a consumerist attitude to one of collaboration, fostering a unified creative space. The synthesis of philosophy and art has the potential to produce unique works that not only captivate audiences but also stimulate profound reflections, bridging the divide between theory and practice.

Full Text

Restricted Access

About the authors

Alina Kryukova

a—s—t—r—a gallery

Author for correspondence.
Email: alina.kryukova@a-s-t-r-a.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Sergey Sonin

Lead and Cobalt Partnership

Email: svetosila2005@yandex.ru
Russian Federation, Moscow

Polina Khanova

Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)

Email: linakhanova@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

Dmitry Khvorostov

Voznesensky Center

Email: liberchaos@gmail.com
Russian Federation, Moscow

Alexander Vileikis

Almaty Management University (AlmaU)

Email: alexandro.vileykis@gmail.com
Kazakhstan, Almaty

References

  1. Badiou A. Maloe rukovodstvo po inestetike [Petit Manuel d’inesthétique], St. Petersburg, EUPRESS, 2014.
  2. Benjamin W. Proizvedenie iskusstva v epokhu ego tekhnicheskoi vosproizvodimosti: izbrannye esse [Das Kunstwerk im Zeitalter seiner technischen Reproduzierbarkeit: Selected Essays], Moscow, Medium, 1996.
  3. Chanyshev A. Aristotel’ [Aristotle], Moscow, Mysl’, 1987.
  4. Deleuze G. Frensis Bekon: logika oshchushcheniia [Francis Bacon: Logique de la sensation], St. Petersburg, Machina, 2011.
  5. Deleuze G., Guattari F. Chto takoe filosofiia? [Qu’est-ce que la philosophie?], St. Petresburg, Aletheia, 2013.
  6. Foucault M. Eto ne trubka [Ceci n’est pas une pipe], Moscow, Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 1999.
  7. Guénon R. Vostok i Zapad [Orient et Occident], Moscow, Belovod’e, 2005.
  8. Haraway D. J. Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC, Duke University Press, 2016.
  9. Hölderlin F. Smert’ Empedokla: tragediia [Der Tod des Empedokles: Ein Trauerspiel], Moscow, Leningrad, Academia, 1931.
  10. Kosuth J. Iskusstvo posle filosofii [Art After Philosophy]. Art Studies, 2001, no. 1, pp. 543–563.
  11. Law J. Modes of Knowing: Resources From the Baroque. Modes of Knowing: Resources From the Baroque (eds J. Law, E. Ruppert), Manchester, Mattering Press, 2016. P. 17–56.
  12. Lyotard J.-F. Otvet na vopros: chto takoe postmodern? [Réponse à la question: qu’est-ce que le postmoderne?]. Ad Marginem ‘93. Yearbook of the Laboratory of Postclassical Studies at the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Ad Marginem, 1994, pp. 307–323.
  13. Nevlyutov M. Ekologicheskoe iskusstvo kak strategiia transformatsii goroda [Environmental Art as a Strategy for Transformation of the City]. Articult, 2016, no. 2 (22), pp. 61–70.
  14. Regev Y. Mech kheruvima [Cherub’s Sword]. Logos (Russia), 2013, vol. 23, no. 2 (92), pp. 94–112.
  15. Smolyanskaya N. Vozvyshennoe v interpretatsiiakh iskusstva postmoderna: kontseptsiia Zh.-F. Liotara dlia vystavki “Nematerial’noe” [The Sublime in the Interpretations of Postmodern Art: The Concept of J.-F. Lyotard for the Exhibition “Immaterial”]. Philosophy Journal, 2009, no. 1 (2), pp. 127–140.
  16. Streltsov I. P’er Iuig. Liminal’naia gotika [Pierre Huyghe. Liminal Gothic]. Spectate, May 30, 2024. Available at: https://spectate.ru/pierre-huyghe/.
  17. This huge sunlit abyss from the future right there next to you…: Emails between Björk Guðmundsdóttir and Timothy Morton, October, 2014. BjöRk: Archives (ed. J. Merry), London, Thames & Hudson, 2015.
  18. Trigg D. Nechto: fenomenologiia uzhasa [The Thing: A Phenomenology of Horror], Perm, Hyle Press, 2017.
  19. Trubetskoy S. Kurs istorii drevnei filosofii [The Course of the History of Ancient Philosophy], Moscow, Urait, 2018.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2025 Logos Philosophical Literary Journal

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).