Treatment of femoral neck fractures at the turn of the century

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

On the basis of world literature data review and personal observations the authors conclude that primary osteosynthesis should be performed on the day of patient’s admission in case no special contraindications are present. The application of massive monolithic fixators is not expedient because of their depress the reparative regeneration in fracture zone and damage blood supply of the femoral head. Two fixators are sufficient for stable osteosynthesis: distal fixator is placed with support at Adams arch and/or Markel «spur» and prevents varus deformity of the femoral head and neck; proximal fixator is inserted into cortex of the femoral neck and prevents the backwards displacement. Stabilisation of femoral neck fragments with screws should be performed by their maximum insertion into cortical bone. Unipolar prosthesis of the femoral head or total hip replacement are indicated mainly in failed osteosynthesis.

About the authors

V. M. Lirtsman

Moscow Medical Dental Institute. N. A. Semashko; Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 59

Author for correspondence.
Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

V. I. Zorya

Moscow Medical Dental Institute. N. A. Semashko; Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 59

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

S. F. Gnetetsky

Moscow Medical Dental Institute. N. A. Semashko; Moscow City Clinical Hospital No. 59

Email: info@eco-vector.com
Russian Federation, Moscow; Moscow

References

  1. Дворецкий Л. //Мед. газета. — 1996. — N 88—89 (5.11). — С. 12—13.
  2. Шестерня Н.А. Современные методы лечения и анализ исходов внутри- и околосуставных переломов длинных трубчатых костей:Автореф. ... дис. д-ра мед. наук. — М., 1992.
  3. Baker G., Barrick Е. //J. Bone Jt Surg. — 1978. — Vol. 60A, N 2. — P. 269—271.
  4. Benterund J. et al. //Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. — 1994. — Vol. 113. — P. 97—100.
  5. Berglund-Roden M. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand.— 1994. - Vol. 65, N 3. — P. 287—294.
  6. Deyerle W. //Clin. Orthop. — 1965. — Vol. 152. — P. 49—84.
  7. Lin C. et al. //SIKOT—96, Final programme. — Amsterdam, 1996. — P. 329.
  8. Lindequist S. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand. — 1993. — Vol. 64, N 1. — P. 67—70.
  9. Smith-Hoffer, Timmerman H. //Clin. Orthop. — 1988.— Vol. 230. — P. 127—140.
  10. Soreide O. et al. //Acta Orthop. Scand. — 1980. — Vol. 51, N 6. — P. 827—831.
  11. Stromqvist B. et al. //Ibid. — 1983. — Vol. 54, N 3. — P. 340—347.
  12. Stromqvist B. et al. //Ibid. — 1992. — Vol. 63, N 3. — P. 282—287.
  13. Thomgren K. //SIKOT—96, Final programme. — Amsterdam, 1996. — P. 155—156.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
2. Fig. 1. Osteosynthesis of the femoral neck with three AO compression screws. 2. Scheme of osteosynthesis of the femoral neck with Hansson fixators. 3. Osteosynthesis of the femoral neck with fixators N.A. Gears. 4. Osteosynthesis of the femoral neck with two subcortical screws with a solid thread.

Download (75KB)

Copyright (c) 1997 Eco-Vector



Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).