Glutathione in Intact Vacuoles: Comparison of Glutathione Pools in Isolated Vacuoles, Plastids, and Mitochondria from Roots of Red Beet


Cite item

Full Text

Open Access Open Access
Restricted Access Access granted
Restricted Access Subscription Access

Abstract

Proportions between oxidized and reduced glutathione forms were determined in vacuoles isolated from red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) taproots. The pool of vacuolar glutathione was compared with glutathione pools in isolated plastids and mitochondria. The ratio of glutathione forms was assessed by approved methods, such as fluorescence microscopy with the fluorescent probe monochlorobimane (MCB), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), and spectrophotometry with 5,5′-dithiobis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB). The fluorescence microscopy revealed comparatively low concentrations of reduced glutathione (GSH) in vacuoles. The GSH content was 104 μM on average, which was lower than the GSH levels in mitochondria (448 μM) and plastids (379 μM). The content of reduced (GSH) and oxidized (GSSG) glutathione forms was quantified by means of HPLC and spectrophotometric assays with DTNB. The glutathione concentrations determined by HPLC in the vacuoles were 182 nmol GSH and 25 nmol GSSG per milligram protein. The respective concentrations of GSH and GSSG in the plastids were 112 and 6 nmol/mg protein and they were 228 and 10 nmol/mg protein in the mitochondria. The levels of GSH determined with DTNB were 1.5 times lower, whereas the amounts of GSSG were, by contrast, 1.5–2 times higher than in the HPLC assays. Although the glutathione redox ratios depended to some extent on the method used, the GSH/GSSG ratios were always lower for vacuoles than for plastids and mitochondria. In vacuoles, the pool of oxidized glutathione was higher than in other organelles.

About the authors

E. V. Pradedova

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Author for correspondence.
Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

O. D. Nimaeva

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

A. B. Karpova

Faculty of Biology and Soil Science

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

N. V. Semenova

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

A. L. Rakevich

Irkutsk Branch of the Institute of Laser Physics, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk

V. N. Nurminskii

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

A. V. Stepanov

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

R. K. Salyaev

Siberian Institute of Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, Siberian Branch

Email: praded@sifibr.irk.ru
Russian Federation, Irkutsk, 664033

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Copyright (c) 2018 Pleiades Publishing, Ltd.