Specific Complications after Pancreatoduodenal Resection Depending on the Pancreatic Transection Plane and the Dorsal Pancreatic Artery Origin
- Авторлар: Dvuhzhilov M.V.1, Markov P.V.1, Gorin D.S.1, Shirokov V.S.1, Kriger A.G.2,3, Struchkov V.Y.1
-
Мекемелер:
- A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
- Russian Scientific Center of Rentgenoradiology
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
- Шығарылым: Том 17, № 3 (2024)
- Беттер: 84-92
- Бөлім: Original articles
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2070-478X/article/view/270497
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.18499/2070-478X-2024-17-3-84-92
- ID: 270497
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Introduction. Pancreaticoduodenectomy (the Whipple procedure) is one of the most complex surgical interventions in abdominal surgery and is associated with a high risk of severe postoperative complications. Studying all aspects of the operation can reduce the incidence of adverse outcomes. One of the ways to reduce the incidence of postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is to shift the pancreatic transection line to the left in order to remove the poorly blood-supplied zone between the cephalocervical and corporocaudal segments.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of different pancreatic transection planes on the incidence of pancreatic fistula in various anatomical origins of the dorsal pancreatic artery.
Material and Methods. The study included 103 patients with the determined origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery. All patients were divided into two groups: with a standard origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery (69 patients) and with a variant origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery (34 patients). In each group, two subgroups were identified depending on the transection plane of the pancreas (at the midpoint of the portal vein and 10-15 mm to the left of its left edge). The short-tern treatment outcomes in subgroups were compared based on the arterial anatomy and transection plane.
Results. In cases of a standard origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery, relocation of the transection plane to the left led to a statistically significant reduction in the frequency of specific complications (p=0.04), clinically significant pancreatic fistula (p=0.037), and gastrostasis type B (ISGPS) (p=0.038). In cases of a variant origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery, no statistically significant difference in subgroups with different transection planes was found.
Conclusion. In case of a standard origin of the dorsal pancreatic artery, it is advisable to shift the transection line to the left. The algorithm for transecting the pancreas in other variants of the dorsal pancreatic artery origin requires further study.
Негізгі сөздер
Толық мәтін
##article.viewOnOriginalSite##Авторлар туралы
Mihail Dvuhzhilov
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: dr.dvukhzhilov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7283-7465
SPIN-код: 2025-4436
main specialist of Methodic accreditation simulation Centre
Ресей, MoscowPavel Markov
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
Email: markov@ixv.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9074-5676
SPIN-код: 6808-9492
M.D., Head of Abdominal Surgery Department
Ресей, MoscowDavid Gorin
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
Email: davidc83@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6452-4458
SPIN-код: 4284-4275
M.D., Senior Research of Abdominal Surgery Department
Ресей, MoscowVadim Shirokov
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
Email: vadimshirokov@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7683-3672
SPIN-код: 6623-6910
radiologist of Roentgen and magnet resonance diagnosis Department
Ресей, MoscowAndrej Kriger
Russian Scientific Center of Rentgenoradiology; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education
Email: krigerandreyg@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4567-8312
SPIN-код: 3496-8889
M.D., Professor, main researcher of labratory of surgical technology in oncology
Ресей, Moscow; MoscowVladimir Struchkov
A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery
Email: doc.struchkov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1555-1596
SPIN-код: 4996-7802
Ph.D., Surgeon of Abdominal Surgery Department
Ресей, MoscowӘдебиет тізімі
- Jin KM, Liu W, Wang K, Bao Q, Wang HW, Xing BC. The individualized selection of Pancreaticoenteric anastomosis in Pancreaticoduodenectomy. BMC Surg. 2020;20(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00791-y
- Hirono S, Shimokawa T, Nagakawa Y, et al. Risk factors for pancreatic fistula grade C after pancreatoduodenectomy: A large prospective, multicenter Japan-Taiwan collaboration study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2020;27(9):622-631. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.799
- Aoki S, Miyata H, Konno H. Risk factors of serious postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy and risk calculators for predicting postoperative complications: a nationwide study of 17,564 patients in Japan. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2017;24(5):243-251. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.438
- Akgul O, Merath K, Mehta R. Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy—Stratification of Patient Risk. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;23(9):1817-1824. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-4045-x
- Probst P, Hüttner FJ, Meydan Ö. Evidence Map of Pancreatic Surgery–A living systematic review with meta-analyses by the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2021;170(5):1517-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.04.023
- Singh K, Kaman L, Tandup C, Raypattanaik N, Dahiya D, Behera A. Internal stenting across the pancreaticojejunostomy and main pancreatic duct after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Pol Przegl Chir. 2021;93(3):40-47. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0014.7225
- Solodky VA, Kriger AG, Gorin DS. Pancreaticoduodenectomy — results and prospects (two-center study). Khir Z im NI Pirogova. 2023;(5):13. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia202305113
- Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014
- Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Mokadam NA. Prospective Trial of a Blood Supply-Based Technique of Pancreaticojejunostomy: Effect on Anastomotic Failure in the Whipple Procedure. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2002;194(6):746-758. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01202-4
- Jwa EK, Hwang S. Extended pancreatic transection for secure pancreatic reconstruction during pancreaticoduodenectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2017;21(3):138. doi: 10.14701/ahbps.2017.21.3.138
- Bardol T, Delicque J, Hermida M. Neck transection level and postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A retrospective cohort study of 195 patients. International Journal of Surgery. 2020;82:43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.08.001
- Kriger AG, Pronin NA, Dvukhzhilov MV, Gorin DS, Pavlov AV, Karmazonovsky GG. Surgical glance at pancreatic arterial anatomy. Ann hir gepatol. 2021;26(3):112-122. doi: 10.16931/1995-5464.2021-3-112-122
- Busnardo AC, DiDio LJA, Thomford NR. Anatomicosurgical segments of the human pancreas. Surg Radiol Anat. 1988;10(1):77-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02094076
- Skandalakis LJ, Rowe JS, Gray SW, Skandalakis JE. Surgical Embryology and Anatomy of the Pancreas. Surgical Clinics of North America. 1993;73(4):661-697. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(16)46080-9
- Laaninen M, Bläuer M, Vasama K. The risk for immediate postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy is increased by high frequency of acinar cells and decreased by prevalent fibrosis of the cut edge of pancreas. Pancreas. 2012;41(6):957-961. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182480b81
- Andreasi V, Partelli S, Rancoita PMV. Clinical and economic validation of grade B postoperative pancreatic fistula subclassification. Surgery. 2022;171(4):846-853. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.09.006
- Bannone E, Andrianello S, Marchegiani G. Postoperative hyperamylasemia (POH) and acute pancreatitis after pancreatoduodenectomy (POAP): State of the art and systematic review. Surgery. 2021;169(2):377-387. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.04.062
- Connor S. Defining post-operative pancreatitis as a new pancreatic specific complication following pancreatic resection. HPB. 2016;18(8):642-651. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2016.05.006
- Chandrabalan VV, McMillan DC, Carter R. Pre-operative cardiopulmonary exercise testing predicts adverse post-operative events and non-progression to adjuvant therapy after major pancreatic surgery. HPB. 2013;15(11):899-907. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12060
- Cuthbertson CM, Christophi C. Disturbances of the microcirculation in acute pancreatitis. British Journal of Surgery. 2006;93(5):518-530. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5316
- Bannone E, Andrianello S, Marchegiani G, et al. Postoperative Acute Pancreatitis Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy: A Determinant of Fistula Potentially Driven by the Intraoperative Fluid Management. Annals of Surgery. 2018;268(5):815-822. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002900
- Sugimoto M, Takahashi S, Kobayashi T. Pancreatic perfusion data and post-pancreaticoduodenectomy outcomes. Journal of Surgical Research. 2015;194(2):441-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.046
- Szuák A, Korom C, Németh K, Nemeskéri Á, Harsányi L. Can the transection plane be optimized in pancreatic resections? Physiol Int. 2023; 110(1):46-51. doi: 10.1556/2060.2022.00122
- SiguA BV, Zemlyanoy VP, Zakharov EA, Tsikoridze MY, Napalkov AN. Unconventional Technique of Terminolateral Pancreatojejunostomy Formation. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Surgery. 2021;14(1):25-32.
