电邮这篇文章 On Properties of Risk Indicators in Comparing Interval Alternatives Problems
- 作者: Shepelev G.I.1
-
隶属关系:
- Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control”, RAS
- 期: 编号 3 (2023)
- 页面: 70-75
- 栏目: Optimal and Rational Choice
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2071-8594/article/view/270343
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.14357/20718594230307
- ID: 270343
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
The correspondence of some risk indicators to the requirement of their coordinated change with the associated preference indicators is studied for problems of comparing interval alternatives. A coordinated change is such a change, in which the value of the corresponding risk indicator increases with the growth of the preference indicator. It is shown that in methods of individual risk, the “mean-risk” type, left-sided risk indicators are coordinated for choosing the distribution mode as an indicator of preference, and also, with known limitations, for choosing the distribution median as a measure of preference. It has been established that the indicator of the mean semi-deviation, which is recommended as an indicator of risk for choosing the mathematical expectation of the distribution as a measure of preference, does not meet this requirement, and therefore cannot, generally speaking, be considered as adequate for problems of comparing interval alternatives.
全文:
作者简介
Gennady Shepelev
Federal Research Center “Computer Science and Control”, RAS
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: gis@isa.ru
Candidate of physical and mathematical sciences, senior researcher. Leading Researcher
俄罗斯联邦, Moscow参考
- Kantorovich L.V. O nekotorykh novykh podkhodakh k vychislitelnym metodam i obrabotke nablyudeny [On some new approaches to computational methods and processing of observations] // Sibirski matematichesky zhurnal [Siberian Mathematical Journal]. 1962. V. 3. No 5. P. 701–709.
- Wilensky P., Livshitz V., Smolyak S. Otsenka effectivnosti investitsionnykh proektov. Teoriya i praktika [Evaluation of the effectiveness of investment projects. Theory and practice] Moscow: Polyprint Serice. 2015.
- Fishburn P.C. Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns // American Economic Review. 1977. V. 67. P. 116–126.
- Sortino F.A., Meer R.V. Downside Risk // Journal of Portfolio Management. 1991. V. 17. No 4. P. 27–31.
- Smolyak S. A. O sravnenii alternative so slushainym effektom [On comparing alternatives with a random effect]// Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and mathematical methods]. 1996. V. 32. Issue 4. P. 107 – 123.
- Ogryczak W, Ruszczyński A. From stochastic dominance to mean-risk models: semideviations as risk measures // European journal of operational research. 1999. V. 116. P. 33–50.
- Nawrocki D. A Brief History of Downside Risk Measures//The Journal of Investing. 1999. V. 8. No 3. P. 9–25.
- Szegö G. Measures of risk // J. Banking&Finance. 2002. V. 26. No 7. P. 1253–1272.
- Sternin M., Shepelev G. Obobshchennye intervalnye ekspertnye otsenki v prinyatii resheny [Generalized interval expert estimations in decision-making] // Doklady Аkademii nauk [Proceedings of the Аcademy of sciences] 2010. V. 432. No 1. P. 33–34.
- Grechuk B., Molyboha A., Zabarankin M. Mean-deviation analysis in the theory of choice // Risk analysis. 2012. V. 32. P. 1277–1292.
- Podinovsky V. Chislovye mery riska kak kriterii vybora pri verotnostnoi neopredelennosti [Numerical measures of risk as choice criteria under probabilistic uncertainty] // Artificial Intelligence and Decision Making]. 2015. No 2. P. 60–74.
- Shepelev G., Khairova N. Collective risk estimating method for comparing poly-interval objects in intelligent systems // COLINS-2021: 5th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems. CEUR Workshop Proceedings. 2021. Vol. 1-2870. P. 866-876.
补充文件
