Impact of ESG Ratings on Companies’ Financial Performance: Evidence from Asia

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

ESG ratings have emerged as a critical instrument for investors to evaluate the long-term risks and ethical dimensions of companies. These ratings quantify companies' performance in environmental, social, and governance aspects. Nevertheless, variations in ESG ratings persist across nations owing to distinct regulatory regimes and rating agency methodologies.
Despite extensive scholarly attention to the influence of global ESG factors, Asian ratings have been barely scrutinized. The research aims to assess the influence of ESG ratings on the financial performance of companies in Asia, with particular focus on South-West Asia (Turkey, Israel, and Saudi Arabia) and South-East Asia (China, Hong Kong, Singapore, and Malaysia). The study, which gathered data from 276 firms over a five-year period (2018–2022), employed STATA software to conduct panel data regressions, with return on assets, return on equity, and price-to-book value serving as dependent variables. First, the results of hypothesis testing show that ESG ratings have a positive effect on financial performance in
South-West Asia, but not in South-East Asia where they have a negative effect. Second, in South-West Asia, one of the environmental, social, or governance (ESG) factors has a more notable influence and results in positive financial ratios, while in South-East Asia, there is no influence from the ESG factors. The study found that ESG ratings have varying effects on financial performance in South-West and South-East Asia, which may be attributed to differences in the historical and cultural development of ESG issues. This study will aid in the development of ESG rating practices for Asian countries.

About the authors

Y. Martynova

Author for correspondence.
Email: yulia.martynova@kramp.ru

I. Lukina

Email: Irina-ufa@bk.ru

References

  1. Alareeni B. A., Hamdan A. ESG impact on performance of US S&P 500-listed firms. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 2020;20(7):1409–1428. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2020-0258
  2. Aboud A., Diab A. The financial and market consequences of environmental, social and governance ratings: The implications of recent political volatility in Egypt. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 2019;10(3):498–520. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2018-0167 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-06-2018-0167
  3. Aureli S., Gigli S., Medei R., Supino E. The value relevance of environmental, social, and governance disclosure: Evidence from Dow Jones Sustainability World Index listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2020;27(1):43–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1772 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1772
  4. Yu E. P., Guo C. Q., Luu B. Van. Environmental, social and governance transparency and firm value. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2018;27(7):987–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2047
  5. Yu E. P., Luu B. Van, Chen C. H. Greenwashing in environmental, social and governance disclosures. Research in International Business and Finance, 2020;52:101192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2020.101192
  6. Brogi M., Lagasio V. Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2019;26(3):576–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1704 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1704
  7. Minutolo M. C., Kristjanpoller W. D., Stakeley J. Exploring environmental, social, and governance disclosure effects on the S&P 500 financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019;28(6):1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2303
  8. Wang K. T., Kartika F., Wang W. W., Luo G. Corporate social responsibility, investor protection, and the cost of equity: Evidence from East Asia. Emerging Markets Review, 2021;47:100801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2021.100801
  9. Chouaibi S., Chouaibi J., Rossi M. ESG and corporate financial performance: the mediating role of green innovation: UK common law versus Germany civil law. EuroMed Journal of Business, 2022;17(1):46–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EMJB-09-2020-0101
  10. Tamimi N., Sebastianelli R. Transparency among S&P 500 companies: an analysis of ESG disclosure scores. Management Decision, 2017;55(8):1660–1680. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0018
  11. Eliwa Y., Aboud A., Saleh A. ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2021;79:102097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.102097
  12. Albitar K., Hussainey K., Kolade N., Gerged A. M. ESG disclosure and firm performance before and after IR: The moderating role of governance mechanisms. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 2020;28(3):429–444. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-09-2019-0108
  13. Landi G., Sciarelli M. Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 2019;15(1):11–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254
  14. Ng A. C., Rezaee Z. Business Sustainability Performance and Cost of Equity Capital (2015). SSRN Electronic Journal, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148611 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3148611
  15. Ng A. C., Rezaee Z. Business sustainability factors and stock price informativeness. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2020;64:101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101688
  16. Xie J., Nozawa W., Yagi M., Fujii H., Managi S. Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019;28(2):286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
  17. Hamrouni A., Boussaada R., Toumi N. B. F. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and debt financing. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 2019;20(4):394–415. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2018-0020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2018-0020
  18. Hamrouni A., Uyar A., Boussaada R. Are corporate social responsibility disclosures relevant for lenders? Empirical evidence from France. Management Decision, 2020;58(2):267–279. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2019-0757 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-06-2019-0757
  19. Hussain N., Rigoni U., Cavezzali E. Does it pay to be sustainable? Looking inside the black box of the relationship between sustainability performance and financial performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 2018;25 (6):1198 –1211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1631
  20. Broadstock D. C., Chan K., Cheng L. T. W., Wang X. The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: Evidence from COVID-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 2021;38:101716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101716
  21. Weber O. Environmental, social and governance reporting in China. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2014;23(5):303–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1785
  22. Li S., Yin P., Liu S. Evaluation of ESG Ratings for Chinese Listed Companies from the Perspective of Stock Price Crash Risk. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2022;10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.933639 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.933639
  23. Mulchandani K., Mulchandani K., Iyer G., Lonare A. Do Equity Investors Care about Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Performance? Evidence from India. Global Business Review, 2022;23(6):1336–1352. https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221129910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09721509221129910

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2023 Martynova Y., Lukina I.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.