Disclosing Current Insights: A Bibliometric Analysis of CSR and Corporate Performance Trends

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

In this paper we conduct a systematic bibliometric analysis to explore the correlation between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and corporate performance. Despite extensive research on CSR’s financial impact, this study aims to offer fresh insights by systematically examining trends and origins in the literature from 2012 to 2022. Additionally, by integrating theoretical foundations with bibliometric analysis, our study addresses a critical gap in the literature, advancing an understanding of CSR’s role in shaping sustainable business practices. Through the analysis of 283 articles using PRISMA, we observe a significant rise in publications on CSR’s impact, especially in Chinese and American contexts, which highlight themes like sustainable development and CSR reporting. By comparing these findings to existing literature, our study contributes to understanding CSR’s evolution. We emphasize the importance of future research that explores these interactions, particularly in African countries, to comprehend CSR’s development in diverse contexts. In conclusion, our research provides original insights into the evolving relationship between CSR practices and corporate performance, guiding future scholarly exploration. This study’s novelty lies in its comprehensive analysis of recent literature, revealing emerging themes and connections in CSR and corporate performance research, thereby enhancing both its practical and theoretical relevance.

About the authors

A. Ouffa

University Chouaib Doukkali, El Jadida, Morocco

Author for correspondence.
Email: ouffaasmae@gmail.com

A. Elkhamlichi

Chouaib Doukkali University, El Jadida, Morocco

Email: abdelbari.el.khamlichi@gmail.com

References

  1. Carroll AB, Shabana KM. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research and Practice. International Journal of Management Reviews. 2010;12(1):85‑105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
  2. Carroll AB. Corporate social responsibility. Organizational Dynamics. avr 2015;44(2):87‑96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002
  3. Sharma E. A review of corporate social responsibility in developed and developing nations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2019;26(4):712‑20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1739
  4. Martynova Y, Lukina I. Impact of ESG Ratings on Companies’ Financial Performance: Evidence from Asia. Корпоративные финансы. 2023;17(3):116‑28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.17.3.2023.116-128
  5. Helfaya A, Aboud A. Editorial for the Special Issue “Corporate Governance, Social Responsibility, Innovation, and Sustainable Business Development Goals”. Sustainability. janv 2023;15(12):9471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129471
  6. Dahlmann F, Roehrich JK. Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2019;28(8):1632‑47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2392
  7. Torres L, Ripa D, Jain A, Herrero J, Leka S. The potential of responsible business to promote sustainable work – An analysis of CSR/ESG instruments. Safety Science. 1 août 2023;164:106151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106151
  8. Tahri W, El Khamlichi A. Disclosure and communication of the corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Morocco: the case of a bank. ICT for a Better Life and a Better World: The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Organizations and Society. 2019;30:247‑61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10737-6_16
  9. De Stefano F, Bagdadli S, Camuffo A. The HR role in corporate social responsibility and sustainability: A boundary-shifting literature review. Human Resource Management. 2018;57(2):549‑66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21870
  10. Orlitzky M. Does Firm Size Comfound the Relationship Between Corporate Social Performance and Firm Financial Performance? Journal of Business Ethics. 1 sept 2001;33(2):167‑80.
  11. Orlitzky M, Benjamin JD. Corporate Social Performance and Firm Risk: A Meta-Analytic Review. Business & Society. 1 déc 2001;40(4):369‑96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000765030104000402
  12. Popov K, Makeeva E. Relationship between Board Characteristics, ESG and Corporate Performance: A Systematic Review. Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы | ISSN: 2073-0438. 20 déc 2022;16(4):119‑34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.16.4.2022.5-20
  13. Tanggamani V, Amran A, Ramayah T. CSR PRACTICES DISCLOSURE’S IMPACT ON CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE OF MALAYSIAN PUBLIC LISTED COMPANIES. International Journal of Business and Society. 2022;23(1):604‑13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4632.2022
  14. Ali R, Sial MS, Brugni TV, Hwang J, Khuong NV, Khanh THT. Does CSR Moderate the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Chinese Firm’s Financial Performance? Evidence from the Shanghai Stock Exchange (SSE) Firms. Sustainability. janv 2020;12(1):149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010149
  15. Khenissi M, Hamrouni A, Farhat NB. Executive compensation indexed to corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Empirical evidence from France. Finance Research Letters [Internet]. 2022;50. Disponible sur: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85135398306&doi=10.1016%2fj.frl.2022.103213&partnerID=40&md5=9eb769ec12f61ca0c3be01344e2f900b
  16. Fahad P, Busru SA. CSR disclosure and firm performance: evidence from an emerging market. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2021;21(4):553‑68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-05-2020-0201
  17. Adegbite E, Guney Y, Kwabi F, Tahir S. Financial and corporate social performance in the UK listed firms: the relevance of non-linearity and lag effects. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2019;52(1):105‑58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0705-x
  18. Moosa A, He F, Arrive TJ. Impact of corporate social responsibility on corporate financial performance: Evidence from the Maldives stock exchange. Human Systems Management. 1 janv 2021;40(1):127‑39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-200899
  19. Masum MH, Uddin MM, Ahmed H, Uddin MH. Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures and Corporate Performence: Evidence from the Listed Companies in Bangladesh. Academy of Strategic Management Journal. 29 avr 2019;18(2):1‑358.
  20. Boukattaya S, Achour Z, Hlioui Z. Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Financial Performance: An Empirical Literature Review. International Journal of Innovative Research and Publications. 30 nov 2021;1‑32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51430/IJIRP.2021.13.001
  21. Usman B, Bernardes OTF, Kananlua PS. On the Nexus Between CSR Practices, ESG Performance, and Asymmetric information. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business. 2020;22(2):151‑77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/gamaijb.54053
  22. Bowen HR. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman [Internet]. University of Iowa Press; 2013 [cité 6 nov 2023]. Disponible sur: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt20q1w8f
  23. Zheng Q, Luo Y, Maksimov V. Achieving legitimacy through corporate social responsibility: The case of emerging economy firms. Journal of World Business. 1 juill 2015;50(3):389‑403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.001
  24. Dixit SKr, Verma H, Priya SS. Corporate social responsibility motives of Indian firms. Journal of Modelling in Management. 1 janv 2021;17(2):518‑38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JM2-07-2020-0190
  25. Friedman M. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In: Zimmerli WC, Holzinger M, Richter K, éditeurs. Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance [Internet]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2007 [cité 4 nov 2023]. p. 173‑8. Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
  26. Freeman RE. The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly. 1994;4(4):409‑21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
  27. Carroll A. The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders. Business Horizons. 1 juill 1991;34:39‑48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
  28. Carroll AB. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility. 5 juill 2016;1(1):3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6
  29. Freeman R, Dmytriyev S. Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya Emerging Issues in Management. 1 déc 2017;7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev
  30. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review. 1983;48(2):147‑60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  31. Scott WR. Approaching Adulthood: The Maturing of Institutional Theory. Theory and Society. 2008;37(5):427‑42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-008-9067-z
  32. Barney JB. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. In: A.C. Baum J, Dobbin F, éditeurs. Economics Meets Sociology in Strategic Management [Internet]. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2000 [cité 5 nov 2023]. p. 203‑27. (Advances in Strategic Management; vol. 17). Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-3322(00)17018-4
  33. Jones T, Harrison J, Felps W. How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review. 19 janv 2018;43:amr.2016.0111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111
  34. Porter ME. Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal. 1991;12(S2):95‑117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250121008
  35. Porter ME, Kramer MR. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard business review. 2002;80(12):56‑68.
  36. Cochran PL, Wood RA. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. AMJ. mars 1984;27(1):42‑56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/255956
  37. Nelling E, Webb E. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: the “virtuous circle” revisited. Rev Quant Finan Acc. 1 févr 2009;32(2):197‑209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-008-0090-y
  38. Pava ML, Krausz J. The association between corporate social-responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost. J Bus Ethics. 1 mars 1996;15(3):321‑57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00382958
  39. De Bakker FGA, Groenewegen P, Den Hond F. A Research Note on the Use of Bibliometrics to Review the Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance Literature. Business & Society. mars 2006;45(1):7‑19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650305283092
  40. Ye N, Kueh TB, Hou L, Liu Y, Yu H. A bibliometric analysis of corporate social responsibility in sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production. 1 nov 2020;272:122679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122679
  41. Sánchez Teba E, Benítez-Márquez MD, Bermudez-Gonzalez G, Luna-Pereira M. Mapping the Knowledge of CSR and Sustainability. Sustainability. 9 sept 2021;13:10106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810106
  42. Ji YG, Tao W, Rim H. Theoretical Insights of CSR Research in Communication from 1980 to 2018: A Bibliometric Network Analysis. J Bus Ethics. 1 mai 2022;177(2):327‑49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w
  43. Ji YG, Tao W, Rim H. Mapping corporate social responsibility research in communication: A network and bibliometric analysis. Public Relations Review. 1 déc 2020;46(5):101963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101963
  44. Low MP, Siegel D. A bibliometric analysis of employee-centred corporate social responsibility research in the 2000s. Social Responsibility Journal. 18 juin 2020;16(5):691‑717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2018-0243
  45. Yarram SR, Adapa S. Board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility: Is there a case for critical mass? Journal of Cleaner Production. 1 janv 2021;278:123‑319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123319
  46. Wu Q, Furuoka F, Lau SC. Corporate social responsibility and board gender diversity: a meta-analysis. Management Research Review. 1 janv 2021;45(7):956‑83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-03-2021-0236
  47. Oduro S, Bruno L, Maccario G. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in SMEs: what we know, what we don’t know, and what we should know. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship. 2021;0(0):1‑32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.1951064
  48. Torkkeli L, Durst S. Corporate Social Responsibility of SMEs: Learning Orientation and Performance Outcomes. Sustainability. janv 2022;14(11):6387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116387
  49. Tiep Le T, Ngo HQ, Aureliano-Silva L. Contribution of corporate social responsibility on SMEs’ performance in an emerging market – the mediating roles of brand trust and brand loyalty. International Journal of Emerging Markets. 1 janv 2021;18(8):1868‑91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1516
  50. Li W, Waris I, Sun C, Hameed I, Bhutto MY, Ali R. Understanding the role of corporate social responsibility and sustainable supply chain management in shaping the consumers’ intention to use sharing platforms. Frontiers in Psychology [Internet]. 2022 [cité 6 nov 2023];13. Disponible sur: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970444 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.970444
  51. Tarigan J, Sutedjo AN, Jie F, Hatane SE. The influence of corporate social responsibility on share price before and after tax amnesty. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. janv 2022;18(3):227‑48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2022.122528
  52. ElAlfy A, Palaschuk N, El-Bassiouny D, Wilson J, Weber O. Scoping the Evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Research in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Era. Sustainability. janv 2020;12(14):5544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145544
  53. Kraus S, Cane M, Ribeiro-Soriano D. Does doing good do well? An investigation into the relationship between consumer buying behavior and CSR. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 31 déc 2022;35(1):584‑601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2021.1970605
  54. Mercadé-Melé P, Fandos-Herrera C, Velasco-Gómez S. How corporate social responsibility influences consumer behavior: An empirical analysis in the Spanish agrifood sector. Agribusiness. 2021;37(3):590‑611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21693
  55. Kankam-Kwarteng C, Donkor GNA, Forkuoh SK. Corporate social responsibility, marketing capabilities and consumer behavioral responses. Revista de Gestão. 1 janv 2022;29(4):410‑23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REGE-08-2020-0068
  56. Carroll AB, Brown JA. Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Current Concepts, Research, and Issues. In: Corporate Social Responsibility [Internet]. Emerald Publishing Limited; 2018 [cité 7 nov 2023]. p. 39‑69. (Business and Society 360; vol. 2). Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002002
  57. Jones TM. Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited, Redefined. California Management Review. 1 avr 1980;22(3):59‑67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41164877
  58. Barney JB, Ketchen DJ, Wright M, Barney JB, Ketchen DJ, Wright M. The Future of Resource-Based Theory: Revitalization or Decline? Journal of Management. 1 sept 2011;37(5):1299‑315. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310391805
  59. Busch T, Schnippering M. Corporate social and financial performance: Revisiting the role of innovation. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022;29(3):635‑45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2225
  60. Allouche J, Laroche P. A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines. 2005;(57):18.
  61. Dixon-Fowler HR, Slater DJ, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE, Romi AM. Beyond “Does it Pay to be Green?” A Meta-Analysis of Moderators of the CEP–CFP Relationship. J Bus Ethics. 1 janv 2013;112(2):353‑66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1268-8
  62. Romanelli JP, Gonçalves MCP, de Abreu Pestana LF, Soares JAH, Boschi RS, Andrade DF. Four challenges when conducting bibliometric reviews and how to deal with them. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 1 nov 2021;28(43):60448‑58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16420-x
  63. Sánchez AD, de la Cruz Del Río Rama M, García JÁ. Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases Scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics. 1 janv 2017;23(1):8‑15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001
  64. Welch V, Petticrew M, Petkovic J, Moher D, Waters E, White H, et al. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration. Int J Equity Health. 8 oct 2015;14(1):92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-015-0219-2
  65. Ge M, Zhang Y, Li Y, Feng C, Tian J, Huang Y, et al. Publication Trends and Hot Spots in Subacromial Impingement Syndrome Research: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Web of Science Core Collection. Journal of Pain Research. 28 mars 2022;15:837‑56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S348528
  66. Xing D, Zhao Y, Dong S, Lin J. Global research trends in stem cells for osteoarthritis: a bibliometric and visualized study. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases. 2018;21(7):1372‑84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.13327
  67. Garcia-Buendia N, Moyano-Fuentes J, Maqueira-Marín JM, Cobo MJ. 22 Years of Lean Supply Chain Management: a science mapping-based bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Production Research. 19 mars 2021;59(6):1901‑21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1794076
  68. Kessler MM. Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation. 1963;14(1):10‑25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
  69. Saeidi SP, Sofian S, Saeidi P, Saeidi SP, Saaeidi SA. How does corporate social responsibility contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of competitive advantage, reputation, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Business Research. 2015;68(2):341‑50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.024
  70. Chen S, Hermes N, Hooghiemstra R. Corporate Social Responsibility and NGO Directors on Boards. Journal of Business Ethics. 2022;175(3):625‑49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04649-4
  71. Tanggamani V, Amran A, Ramayah T. CSR PRACTICES DISCLOSURE’S IMPACT ON CORPORATE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE OF MALAYSIAN PUBLIC LISTED COMPANIES. Int J Bus Soc. 2022;23(1):604‑13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4632.2022
  72. Wang C, Xu H, Li G, Chen JL. Community social responsibility and the performance of small tourism enterprises: Moderating effects of entrepreneurs’ demographics. International Journal of Tourism Research. 2018;20(6):685‑97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.2216
  73. Mattera M, Soto Gonzalez F, Alba Ruiz-Morales C, Gava L. Facing a global crisis - how sustainable business models helped firms overcome COVID. Corp Gov. 2020;21(6):1100‑16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-07-2020-0309
  74. Ng PML, Wut TM, Lit KK, Cheung CTY. Drivers of corporate social responsibility and firm performance for sustainable development—An institutional theory approach. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manage. 2022;29(4):871‑86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2241
  75. Bhattacharyya A, Rahman ML. Mandatory CSR expenditure and firm performance. J Contemp Acc Econ [Internet]. 2019;15(3). Disponible sur: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85073743100&doi=10.1016%2fj.jcae.2019.100163&partnerID=40&md5=90815e03b953818d61f09b94200ecffd
  76. Chijoke-Mgbame AM, Mgbame CO, Akintoye S, Ohalehi P. The role of corporate governance on CSR disclosure and firm performance in a voluntary environment. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 1 janv 2020;20(2):294‑306. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-06-2019-0184
  77. Tanggamani V, Amran A, Ramayah T. The virtuous cycle of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The mediating role of firm reputation. Humanities and Social Sciences Letters. 2020;8(1):62‑77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.73.2020.81.62.77
  78. Ajaz A, Shenbei Z, Sarfraz M. Delineating the influence of boardroom gender diversity on corporate social responsibility, financial performance, and reputation. Logforum. 2020;16(1):61‑74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.376
  79. Boukattaya S, Ftiti Z, Ben Arfa N, Omri A. Financial performance under board gender diversity: The mediating effect of corporate social practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. 2022;29(5):1871‑83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2333
  80. Thrall C. Public-private governance initiatives and corporate responses to Stakeholder complaints. International Organization. 2021;75(3):803‑36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818321000199
  81. Nguyen TTT, Nguyen TTT, Tran TT, Luong TA, Luu KC. The effect of corporate social responsibility on green supply chain management and firm performance. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. 2022;10(3):807‑18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.uscm.2022.3.013
  82. León-Gómez A, Santos-Jaén JM, Ruiz-Palomo D, Palacios-Manzano M. Disentangling the impact of ICT adoption on SMEs performance: the mediating roles of corporate social responsibility and innovation. Oeconomia Copernicana. 2022;13(3):831‑6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.024
  83. Jiraporn P, Potosky D, Lee SM. Corporate governance and lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender-supportive human resource policies from corporate social responsibility, resource-based, and agency perspectives. Human Resource Management. 2019;58(3):317‑36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21954

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML
Download

Copyright (c) 2024 Ouffa A., Elkhamlichi A.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.