Representative government — the 21st century: legislation, comments, problems

The article analyzes the role and place of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the system of state power, its specific competencies and problems of law enforcement. The issues of inconsistency in decisions and the use of abstract principles for argumentation are considered. Special attention is paid to the practice of decision-making, the influence of the socio-political context and the problem of overcoming legal conflicts. The author raises the issue of the need to regulate procedures for changing constitutional interpretations to ensure the stability of the legal system.

The article seems to touch upon important aspects of the work of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, its role in the system of state power, as well as the problems faced by the court in the process of law enforcement.

In the presented article, the author considers the collection, processing, storage and dissemination of information as effective methods of influencing the socio-political sphere. Information disseminated through the media, social networks, instant messengers, public events influences the political views of those who consume it. It is obvious that it is perceived, analyzed, discussed by a person and influences his line of behavior. Consequently, the listed methods of influencing the socio-political sphere can be used to achieve both positive and negative goals. In the work, the author provides facts of the influence of processed information on the socio-political situation. The researcher also considers examples of the activities of special services of hostile states that used the above methods to provoke citizens to mass riots and, as a result, a change in the political regime; describes the events that led to the erosion of the state, which negatively affected the standard of living of the population. The author concludes that government agencies should more carefully identify sources of information, since some of them deliberately disseminate false data in order to harm the country. In addition, control by the state administration over the methods of its dissemination is required. It is necessary to have the ability to stop the work of channels disseminating information aimed at damaging state security and sovereignty.

The article analyzes the topic of nationalization of private property. The urgency of this issue is due to the accelerated process of changing ownership forms, which is typical for periods of crisis and increasing threats to national security. In recent years, the policy of nationalization has taken the greatest scope as a response to economic crises, a set of measures to counteract the COVID pandemic, under this pretext there is also an illegal seizure of Russian private and state assets by Western countries and, in general, an aggravation of the international situation. The policy of nationalization is an important component of the state's economic policy, especially in times of crisis in history. The author considers the policy of nationalization as a set of political, economic and legal measures to withdraw property from private ownership into state ownership in accordance with the national interests of the country or for political reasons. Modern foreign experience testifies to the widespread use of the policy of nationalization in order to ensure national security, as well as the realization of other national, corporate or political interests. The author concludes that with the aggravation of the international situation, including against the background of a special military operation in Ukraine, it is advisable for Russia to continue improving the nationalization policy within the framework of existing national legislation.

The article is devoted to the analysis of the formation and implementation of the peace treaty in Tajikistan under the conditions of civil war. This aspect is considered taking into account the study of both normative and media resources devoted to the peace process. The conceptual basis of the work is that in the conditions of the civil war peace became an institutional unification of the warring parties on the basis of the principle of interaction and mutual understanding established by the country's legislation in order to restore and create a national and secular state. However, the peace treaty did not prove to be a universal factor in the sustainability of peace policy as a legitimate order, which actualises the scientific study of its mechanisms and institutions of implementation. This approach makes it possible to create a saw picture of this institutional order in the conditions of political and ideological confrontation in the post-conflict period.