Steam Conversion of Ethane and Methane–Ethane Mixtures in Membrane Reactor with a Foil from Pd–Ru Alloy

L. P. Didenko; Диденко Л. П.; V. N. Babak; Бабак В. Н.; L. A. Sementsova; Семенцова Л. А.; T. V. Dorofeeva; Дорофеева Т. В.; P. E. Chizhov; Чижов П. Е.; S. V. Gorbunov; Горбунов С. В.

doi:10.31857/S2218117223020037

Steam Conversion of Ethane and Methane–Ethane Mixtures in Membrane Reactor with a Foil from Pd–Ru Alloy

Authors: Didenko L.P.¹, Babak V.N.¹, Sementsova L.A.¹, Dorofeeva T.V.¹, Chizhov P.E.¹, Gorbunov S.V.²
Affiliations:
1. Institute of Problems of Chemical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences
2. Baikov Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Russian Academy of Sciences
Issue: Vol 13, No 2 (2023)
Pages: 83-95
Section: Articles
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2218-1172/article/view/137989
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2218117223020037
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HYVKWL
ID: 137989

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

The features of steam conversion of ethane and methane-ethane mixtures containing 5, 10 and 15% ethane in a membrane reactor with a 30 μm thick Pd–Ru foil at temperatures of 1800 and 3600 h^–1 and steam/feed rations of 3 and 5 have been investigated. Comparative experiments with “non-membrane” reaction have shown that in the membrane reactor the feedstock conversion to form H₂ and CO₂ increases and ethane hydrocracking decreases. Increasing the rate of H₂ recovery through the membrane by permeate evacuation leads to an increase in the yield of H₂ and CO₂. With a decrease in the steam/feed ratio from 5 to 3, the ethane hydrocracking and the rate of carbon deposits formation increases. Optimal conditions for steam conversion of ethane and methane-ethane mixtures are T = 773 K, feed space velocity of 1800 h^–1 and steam/feed ratio of 5. The established regularities are similar to those obtained earlier for other types of raw materials (mixtures of methane with propane, propane, n-butane, a mixture simulating the average composition of associated petroleum gas) in this membrane reactor.

Keywords

метан-этановая смесь, этан, паровая конверсия, мембранный реактор

References

Филиппов С.П., Ярославцев А.Б. // Успехи химии. 2021. Т. 90. № 6. С. 627. (Filippov S.P., Yaroslavtsev A.B. // Russian Chemical Reviews. 2021. V. 90. № 6. P. 627).
Dincer I., Acar C. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2015. V. 40. P. 11094.
Грязнов В.М. // Докл. АН СССР. 1969. Т. 189. С. 794.
Gryaznov V.M. // Platinum Met. Rev. 1986. V. 30. P. 68.
Грязнов В.М., Ермилова М.М., Орехова Н.В., Скакунова Е.В. // Изв. АН СССР. Сер. Хим. 1988. № 4. С. 750. (Gryaznov V.M., Ermilova M.M., Orekhova N.V., Skakunova E.V. // Russ.Chem. Bull., International Edition. 1988. V. 37. P. 637).
Gryaznov V.M. // Sep. Purif. Rev. 2000. V. 29. P. 171.
Habib M.A., Harale A., Paglieri S., Alrashed F.S., Alsayoud A., Rao M.V., Nemitallah M.A., Hossain S., Hussien M., Ali A., Haque M.A., Abuelyamen A., Shakeel M.R., Mokheimer E.M.A., Ben-Mansour R. // Energy Fuels. 2021. V. 35. № 7. P. 5558.
Jokar S.M., Farokhnia A., Tavakolian M., Pejman M., Parvasi P., Javanmardi J., Zare F., Clara Gonçalves M., Basile A. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Anzelmo B., Wilcox J., Liguori S. // J. Membr. Sci. 2018. V. 565. P. 25.
Anzelmo B., Wilcox J., Liguori S. // J. Membr. Sci. 2018. V. 568. P. 113–120.
Shirasaki Y., Tsuneki T., Ota Y., Yasuda I., Tachibana S., Nakajima H., Kobayashi K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2009. V. 34. P. 4482.
Kim C.-H., Han J.-Y., Kim S., Lee B., Lim H., Lee K.-Y., Ryi S.-K. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018. V. 43. № 15. P. 7684.
Диденко Л.П., Бабак В.Н., Семенцова Л.А., Дорофеева Т.В., Чижов П.Е., Горбунов С.В. // Мембраны и мембранные технологии. 2021. Т. 11. № 5. С. 336. (Didenko L.P., Babak V.N., Sementsova L.A., Dorofeeva T.V., Chizhov P.E., and Gorbunov S.V. // Membranes and Membrane Technologies. 2021. V. 3. № 5. P. 302).
Angeli S.D., Pilitsis F.G., Lemonidou A.A. // Catalysis Today. 2015. V. 242. P. 119.
Veranitisagul C., Koonsaeng N., Laosiripojana N., Laobuthee A. // J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012. V. 18. P. 898.
Li S., Gong J. // Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014. V. 43. P. 7245.
Jeong S., Kim S., Lee B., Ryi S.-K., Lim H. // Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2018. V. 43. P. 7693.
Бурханов Г.С., Рошан Н.Р., Горбунов С.В., Касьянов В.С., Кутербеков К.А., Бекмырза К.Ж., Мерзадинова Г.Т. // Металлы. 2021. № 2. С. 71.
Бабак В.Н., Диденко Л.П., Семенцова Л.А., Квурт Ю.П. // Теоретические основы химической технологии. 2022. Т.56. № 3. С. 282. (Babak V.N., Didenko L.P., Sementsova L.A., Kvurt J.P. // Theoretical foundations of chemical engineering. 2022. V. 56. № 3. P. 279).
Диденко Л.П., Семенцова Л.А., Бабак В.Н., Чижов П.Е., Дорофеева Т.В., Квурт Ю.П. // Мембраны и мембранные технологии. 2020. Т. 10. № 2. С. 99. (Didenko L.P., Babak V.N., Sementsova L.A., Chizhov P.E., Dorofeeva T.V., Kvurt J.P. // Membranes and Membrane Technologies. 2020. V. 2. № 2. P. 85.)