Influence of the Approach to Membrane Mass Transfer Characteristics Determination on the Process Simulation Results

A. A. Atlaskin; Атласкин А. А.; S. S. Kryuchkov; Крючков С. С.; A. N. Stepakova; Степакова А. Н.; I. S. Moiseenko; Моисеенко И. С.; N. S. Tsivkovsky; Цивковский Н. С.; K. A. Smorodin; Смородин К. А.; A. N. Petukhov; Петухов А. Н.; M. E. Atlaskina; Атласкина М. Е.; I. V. Vorotyntsev; Воротынцев И. В.

doi:10.31857/S2218117223060032

Influence of the Approach to Membrane Mass Transfer Characteristics Determination on the Process Simulation Results

Authors: Atlaskin A.A.¹, Kryuchkov S.S.¹, Stepakova A.N.¹, Moiseenko I.S.¹, Tsivkovsky N.S.¹, Smorodin .A.¹, Petukhov A.N.¹^,2, Atlaskina M.E.¹, Vorotyntsev I.V.¹
Affiliations:
1. Mendeleev Russian University of Chemical Technology
2. Department of Chemistry, Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod
Issue: Vol 13, No 6 (2023)
Pages: 464-474
Section: Articles
URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2218-1172/article/view/231880
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S2218117223060032
EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HYEROY
ID: 231880

Cite item

Full Text

Open Access
Restricted Access

Access granted
Restricted Access

Subscription Access

Abstract
About the authors
References
Supplementary files
Statistics

Abstract

In this work, the dependence of the output characteristics determined in the simulation of the gas separation membrane process on the gas transport characteristics of the membrane specified as parameters of the membrane module model has been investigated. The study was carried out on a laboratory setup containing polyphenylene oxide hollow fibres. As a result of this integrated study, including theoretical and experimental approaches, it has been determined that when using the ideal gas transport characteristics obtained for pure gases to simulate the process, the error expressed in achievable concentration of the target component in the product stream ranges from 1.5 to 8.8% compared to the experimentally obtained values for the same module geometry and the same membrane area. This discrepancy can lead both to unattainable targets for the technological line and to an incorrect technical and economic evaluation of the process. Thus, the design of technological lines using mathematical modelling tools should be based on the “effective” gas transport characteristics of the material and/or product obtained for the components of real gas mixtures or simulating real gas mixtures.

Keywords

membrane gas separation, polyphenylene oxide, mathematical modelling, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon dioxide

References

Alsawaftah N., Abuwatfa W., Darwish N., Husseini G. // Water. 2021. V. 13. I. 9. P. 1327.
Chaturvedi P., Moehring N.K., Cheng P., Vlassiouk I., Boutilier M.S.H., Kidambi P.R. // J. Materials Chemistry A. 2022. V. 10. I. 37. P. 19797–19810.
Trubyanov M.M., Drozdov P.N., Atlaskin A.A., Battalov S.V., Puzanov E.S., Vorotyntsev A.V., Petukhov A.N., Vorotyntsev V.M., Vorotyntsev I.V. // J. Membrane Science. 2017. V. 530. P. 53–64.
Trubyanov M.M., Kirillov S.Y., Vorotyntsev A.V., Sazanova T.S., Atlaskin A.A., Petukhov A.N., Kirillov Y.P., Vorotyntsev I.V. // J. Membrane Science. 2019. V. 587. № 117173.
Ahmad F., Lau K.K., Shariff A.M., Murshid G. // Computers & Chemical Engineering. 2012. V. 36. I. 1. P. 119–128.
Chu Y., He X. // Membranes. 2018. V. 8. I. 4. P. 118.
Atlaskin A.A., Trubyanov M.M., Yanbikov N.R., Bukovsky M.V., Drozdov P.N., Vorotyntsev V.M., Vorotyntsev I.V. // Petroleum Chemistry. 2018. V. 58. I. 6.
Merkel T.C., Lin H., Wei X., Baker R. // J. Membrane Science. 2010. V. 359. I. 1–2. P. 126–139.
Bounaceur R., Berger E., Pfister M., Ramirez Santos A.A., Favre E. // J. Membrane Science. 2017. V. 523. P. 77–91.
Zhao L., Riensche E., Menzer R., Blum L., Stolten D. // J. Membrane Science. 2008. V. 325. I. 1. P. 284–294.
Brunetti A., Zito P.F., Borisov I., Grushevenko E., Volkov V., Volkov A., Barbieri G. // Fuel Processing Technology. 2020. V. 210. № 106550.
Atlaskin A.A., Petukhov A.N., Stepakova A.N., Tsivkovsky N.S., Kryuchkov S.S., Smorodin K.A., Moiseenko I.S., Atlaskina M.E., Suvorov S.S., Stepanova E.A., Vorotyntsev I.V. // Membranes. 2023. V. 13. I. 3. P. 270.
Yang X., Duke M., Zhang J., Li J. De // Separation and Purification Technology. 2019. V. 224. P. 121–131.
Maarefian M., Bandehali S., Azami S., Sanaeepur H., Moghadassi A. // International J. Energy Research. 2019. V. 43. I. 14. P. 8217–8229.
Trubyanov M.M., Mochalov G.M., Suvorov S.S., Puzanov E.S., Petukhov A.N., Vorotyntsev I.V., Vorotyntsev V.M. // J. Chromatography A. 2018. V. 1560. P. 71–77.
Petukhov A.N., Atlaskin A.A., Kryuchkov S.S., Smorodin K.A., Zarubin D.M., Petukhova A.N., Atlaskina M.E., Nyuchev A.V., Vorotyntsev A.V., Trubyanov M.M., Vorotyntsev I. V., Vorotynstev V.M. // Chemical Engineering J. 2020. P. 127726.
Grushevenko E.A., Borisov I.L., Bakhtin D.S., Bondarenko G.N., Levin I.S., Volkov A.V. // Reactive and Functional Polymers. 2019. V. 134. P. 156–165.
Zhmakin V., Shalygin M., Khotimskiy V., Matson S., Teplyakov V. // Separation and Purification Technology. 2019. V. 212. P. 877–886.
Ovcharova A., Vasilevsky V., Borisov I., Bazhenov S., Volkov A., Bildyukevich A., Volkov V. // Separation and Purification Technology. 2017. V. 183. P. 162–172.
Anselmi H., Mirgaux O., Bounaceur R., Patisson F. // Chemical Engineering & Technology. 2019. V. 42. I. 4. P. 797–804.
Lin H., Freeman B.D. // J. Membrane Science. 2004. V. 239. I. 1. P. 105–117.
Kim J.H., Lee Y.M. // J. Membrane Science. 2001. V. 193. I. 2. P. 209–225.
Deng L., Hägg M.B. // International J. Greenhouse Gas Control. 2010. V. 4. I. 4. P. 638–646.
Deng L., Kim T.J., Hägg M.B. // J. Membrane Science. 2009. V. 340. I. 1–2. P. 154–163.
Houde A.Y., Krishnakumar B., Charati S.G., Stern S.A., Wiley J. // J. Applied Polymer Science. 1996. V. 62. I. 13. P. 2181–2192.
Daham Wiheeb A., Mun A., Karim E.A., Mohammed T.E., Othman R. // Diyala J. Engineering Sciences. 2015. P. 846–854.
Niknejad S.M.S., Savoji H., Pourafshari Chenar M., Soltanieh M. // International J. Environmental Science and Technology. 2017. V. 14. I. 2. P. 375–384.
Orme C.J., Stewart F.F. // J. Membrane Science. 2005. V. 253. I. 1–2. P. 243–249.
Makhloufi C., Roizard D., Favre E. // J. Membrane Science. 2013. V. 441. P. 63–72.
Vorotyntsev I.V., Shablykin D.N., Drozdov P.N., Trubyanov M.M., Petukhov A.N., Battalov S.V. // Petroleum Chemistry. 2017. V. 57. I. 2. P. 172–181.
Modigell M., Schumacher M., Teplyakov V.V., Zenkevich V.B. // Desalination. 2008. V. 224. I. 1–3. P. 186–190.
Platé N.A., Bokarev A.K., Kaliuzhnyi N.E., Litvinova E.G., Khotimskii V.S., Volkov V.V., Yampol’skii Yu.P. // J. Membrane Science. 1991. V. 60. I. 1. P. 13–24.
Vorotyntsev I.V., Drozdov P.N., Karyakin N.V. // Inorganic Materials. 2006. V. 42. I. 3. P. 231–235.
Makhloufi C., Belaissaoui B., Roizard D., Favre E. // Procedia Engineering. 2012. V. 44. P. 143–146.
Phillip W.A., Martono E., Chen L., Hillmyer M.A., Cussler E.L. // J. Membrane Science. 2009. V. 337. I. 1. P. 39–46.
Barrer R.M., Barrie J.A., Slater J. // J. Polymer Science. 1958. V. 27. I. 115. P. 177–197.
GitHub – CCSI-Toolset/membrane_model: Membrane Separation Model: Updated hollow fiber membrane model and system example for carbon capture., (n.d.). https://github.com/CCSI-Toolset/membrane_model.