13岁青少年经膀胱镜机器人辅助输尿管再植术: 临床病例
- 作者: Sizonov V.V.1,2, Makarov A.G.1,2, Pirogov A.V.1, Pakus S.M.3, Kogan M.I.2
-
隶属关系:
- Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital
- Rostov State Medical University
- Clinical and Diagnostic Center “Zdorovie”
- 期: 卷 15, 编号 1 (2025)
- 页面: 71-78
- 栏目: Case reports
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2219-4061/article/view/312984
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.17816/psaic1888
- ID: 312984
如何引用文章
全文:
详细
过去二十年来,大量临床研究证实了经膀胱镜输尿管再植术在儿童中的有效性和安全性,相关文献广泛报道了其应用。然而,该术式的广泛应用仍然受限,主要原因包括膀胱内极小的操作空间以及外科医生的非人体工学操作体位,使手术技术难度较大。机器人工具的应用可显著降低手术的学习难度,并提高该术式的可操作性。本文报道了一例13岁女孩接受da Vinci Xi机器人手术系统辅助的经膀胱镜输尿管再植术。患者因膀胱输尿管反流及复发性尿路感染接受手术治疗。采用Cohen 术式进行尿道膀胱吻合,手术顺利完成,无需转换为开放手术,且术中无并发症。总手术时间: 160 分钟。机器人控制台操作时间: 85 分钟。术中出血量: 10 ml。术后并发症: 发生1例尿路感染,经保守治疗后痊愈。机器人辅助经膀胱镜输尿管再植术是一种可行的微创替代方案,与传统腹腔镜和经膀胱镜尿道膀胱吻合术相比,具有更高的手术舒适度。然而,da Vinci Xi机器人系统在低龄儿童膀胱内手术的适用性仍需进一步研究。
作者简介
Vladimir V. Sizonov
Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Rostov State Medical University
编辑信件的主要联系方式.
Email: vsizonov@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9145-8671
SPIN 代码: 2155-5534
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine), Professor
俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-DonAlexey G. Makarov
Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital; Rostov State Medical University
Email: lexxrgmu@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9311-3706
SPIN 代码: 6017-3765
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don; Rostov-on-DonAleksandr V. Pirogov
Regional Children’s Clinical Hospital
Email: alekspirogow@yandex.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8031-2597
SPIN 代码: 6854-5479
MD, Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-DonSergei M. Pakus
Clinical and Diagnostic Center “Zdorovie”
Email: sergejj.pakus@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6468-5983
SPIN 代码: 2225-6695
Cand. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-DonMikhail I. Kogan
Rostov State Medical University
Email: dept_kogan@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1710-0169
SPIN 代码: 6300-3241
MD, Dr. Sci. (Medicine)
俄罗斯联邦, Rostov-on-Don参考
- Sargent MA. What is the normal prevalence of vesicoureteral reflux? Pediatr Radiol. 2000;30:587–593. doi: 10.1007/s002470000263
- Gimpel C, Masioniene L, Djakovic N, et al. Complications and long-term outcome of primary obstructive megaureter in childhood. Pediatr Nephrol. 2010;25(9):1679–1686. doi: 10.1007/s00467-010-1523-0 EDN: FWWSRE
- Doery AJ, Ang E, Ditchfield MR. Duplex kidney: not just a drooping lily. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2015;59(2):149–153. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12285
- Heidenreich A, Ozgur E, Becker T, Haupt G. Surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in pediatric patients. World J Urol. 2004;22(2):96–106. doi: 10.1007/s00345-004-0408-x
- Valla JS, Steyaert H, Griffin SJ, et al. Transvesicoscopic Cohen ureteric reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children: a single-centre 5-year experience. J Pediatr Urol. 2009;5(6):466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.012
- Bondarenko S. Laparoscopic extravesical transverse ureteral reimplantation in children with obstructive megaureter. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(4):437–441. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.01.001 EDN: RFIIYR
- Jayanthi VR. Vesicoscopic cross-trigonal ureteral reimplantation: High success rate for elimination of primary reflux. J Pediatr Urol. 2018;14(4):324.e1–324.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.04.005
- Dubrov VI, Strotsky AV. Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic (Lich–Gregoir) and vesicoscopic (Cohen) techniques in the treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. Medical Journal. 2020;(3):68–74. EDN: UZHHKD
- Peláez Mata D, Herrero Álvarez S, Gómez Sánchez A, et al. Laparoscopic learning curves. Curvas de aprendizaje en laparoscopia. Cir Pediatr. 2021;34(1):20–27.
- Kanojia RP, Pandey A, Bawa M. Robotic assisted vesicoscopic Cohen’s reimplantation in pediatric patient: nuances of technique, experience, and outcome. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020;30(10):1137–1141. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0401 EDN: ZGGBBB
- Intagliata E, Vizzini C, Vecchio R. Ergonomics in laparoscopic surgery. Ann Ital Chir. 2022;92:117–121.
- Cadière GB, Himpens J, Germay O, et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg. 2001;25(11):1467–1477. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0132-2
- Anand S, Sandlas G, Pednekar A, et al. A comparative study of the ergonomic risk to the surgeon during vesicoscopic and robotic cross-trigonal ureteric reimplantation. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2021. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0471 EDN: CMSVQB
- Mei H, Tang S. Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: Current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr. 2023;11. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 EDN: RBCKSR
- Peters CA, Woo R. Intravesical robotically assisted bilateral ureteral reimplantation. J Endourol. 2005;19(6):618–622. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.618
- Marchini GS, Hong YK, Minnillo BJ, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children: case matched comparative study with open surgical approach. J Urol. 2011;185(5):1870–1875. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.12.069
- Chan KW, Lee KH, Tam YH, Sihoe JD. Early experience in robotic-assisted laparoscopic bilateral intravesical ureteral reimplantation for vesicoureteral reflux in children. J Robot Surg. 2012;6(3):259–262. doi: 10.1007/s11701-011-0288-1
- Ansari MS, Yadav P, Chakraborty A, et al. Robot-assisted foley tie ureteric tapering and reimplantation. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2024;29(2):98–103. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_131_23 EDN: QJESWS
补充文件
