Verbs Derived From Adjectives: Telicity and Event Structure

Cover Page

Cite item

Full Text

Abstract

This article discusses the derivation of verbs from adjectives in two areally related languages, Hill Mari and Tatar (Mishar dialect). Such verbs in both languages are formed using the suffix -l, which, presumably, was borrowed into Hill Mari from the Turkic languages. In both cases, the suffix derives verbs of several structural types (inchoatives, causatives and unergatives), but the semantic relations between the original stem and the derived verb are not always predicted by the existing theories of the phenomenon. In particular, it is commonly assumed that the adjectives of the so-called open scales derive telic verbs by default, and the adjectives of closed scales derive atelic verbs. We show that this prediction is not always confirmed in the languages in question and present an overview of existing derivational models that differ from each other in terms of semantic relationships between the adjectival stem and the derived verb. Although most deadjectival verbs in Hill Mari and Tatar are expected to form telic verbs with an inchoative component (‘become A’), there are exceptions to this principle in both languages. In Hill Mari, telicity is associated exclusively with the closed scale of an adjective, while in Tatar it also correlates with non-zero change-of-state readings available with some verbs. In addition, in both languages, the unergative model is widely represented by atelic behavior-related verbs (‘behave in a manner associated with A’). We propose that in the latter case, adjectival stems undergo covert substantivization and can be integrated into an unergative structure, which does not violate any principles of known theories and does not require any additional assumptions. This proposal is consistent both with the fact that adjectives forming behavior-related verbs are also widely used as nouns in the languages under consideration, and the scale of an adjective correctly predicts telic properties of a verb.

About the authors

Vadim Viktorovich Dyachkov

Institute of Linguistics RAS; Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: hyppocentaurus@mail.ru
Moscow, Russian Federation

Sergey Georgievich Tatevosov

Lomonosov Moscow State University

Email: tatevosov@gmail.com
Moscow, Russian Federation

References

  1. Hale K. & Keyser S. J. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
  2. Harley H. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English / Nomi Erteschik-Shir, Tova Rapoport T. (eds.) The Syntax of aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. P. 42–64.
  3. Kearns K. Telic senses of deadjectival verbs // Lingua. 2007. No. 117. P. 26–66.
  4. Kennedy Ch. & Louise McN. Scale structure, degree modification, and the semantics of gradable predicates. Language. 2005. No. 81 (2). P. 345–381.
  5. Kennedy Ch. & Beth L. Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Louise McNally, Christopher Kennedy (eds.). Adjectives and adverbs: syntax, semantics and discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. P. 156–182.
  6. Kennedy Ch. The composition of incremental change // Demonte V., McNally L. (eds.). Telicity, change, state: A cross-categorial view of event structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012. P. 103–121.
  7. Martin F. & Hamida D. Partitive accomplishments across languages // Linguistics. 2020. No. 58 (5). P. 1195–1232.
  8. Галкин И. С. Историческая грамматика марийского языка. Морфология. Часть II. Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное изд-во, 1966.
  9. Закиев М. З., Ганиев Ф. А., Зиннатуллина К. З. (ред.). Татарская грамматика. Том 1. Фонетика. Казань, 1995.
  10. Пенгитов Н. Т., Галкин И. С., Исанбаев Н. И. (ред.) Современный марийский язык. Морфология. Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное изд-во, 1961.
  11. Саваткова А. А. Словарь горномарийского языка. Йошкар-Ола: Марийское книжное изд-во, 2008.
  12. Татевосов С. Г. Событийная структура некоторых отыменных глаголов // Элементы татарского языка в типологическом освещении. Мишарский диалект. Москва: Буки Веди, 2017. С. 249–280.
  13. Татевосов С. Г., Киселева К. Л. Инкорпорация и акциональность: несколько наблюдений о предельности отыменных глаголов // Е. В. Головко, Е. В. Горбова, П. А. Кочаров (ред.). Взаимодействие аспекта со смежными категориями. СПб: Изд-во РПГУ им. А.И. Герцена, 2020. С. 431–444.
  14. Шитц О. А. Атрибутивная группировка словоформ качественной семантики в уральских языках (в сравнительно-сопоставительном аспекте): дис. … канд. филол. наук. Томск: ТГПУ, 2012.

Supplementary files

Supplementary Files
Action
1. JATS XML

Согласие на обработку персональных данных

 

Используя сайт https://journals.rcsi.science, я (далее – «Пользователь» или «Субъект персональных данных») даю согласие на обработку персональных данных на этом сайте (текст Согласия) и на обработку персональных данных с помощью сервиса «Яндекс.Метрика» (текст Согласия).