Polycode Semiosis of Communication on Digital Social Platforms
- Authors: Fomin A.G.1, Gabitov S.R.1
-
Affiliations:
- Kemerovo State University
- Issue: No 2 (2025)
- Pages: 98-114
- Section: СЕМИОТИЧЕСКИЕ АСПЕКТЫ КОММУНИКАЦИИ. ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ ПОЛИКОДОВЫХ ТЕКСТОВ
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-1327/article/view/305976
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.51955/2312-1327_2025_2_98
- ID: 305976
Cite item
Full Text
Abstract
This study examined polycode semiosis in communication on the popular Telegram platform, where the interaction of verbal and non-verbal codes forms the basis for effective information transmission. The research relevance stems from the need to analyze polycode texts in the context of digitalization, where the growing role of virtual communication is transforming traditional semiotic systems. The study aim was to identify the features of polycode communication as a means of representing the author’s intent by establishing correlations between verbal and non-verbal codes. This paper focused on examining polycode texts in Telegram news channels and their role in conveying the author’s intent. These texts perform cognitive, expressive, phatic, and metadiscursive functions. The study analyzed the interaction between verbal and non-verbal components of messages. The results confirmed that polycode communication enhanced the communicative potential of content. The non-verbal code can both complement the meaning conveyed by the verbal code, revealing the sender’s stance, and alter it, sometimes even contrasting with it, to express an additional evaluation that is not explicitly represented through verbal means.
Keywords
About the authors
A. G. Fomin
Kemerovo State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: kafedra_pil@mail.ru
Doctor of Philology, Professor 66, Krasnay street, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
Sh. R. Gabitov
Kemerovo State University
Email: shamil9907@mail.ru
Postgraduate student 6, Krasnay street, Kemerovo, 650000, Russia
References
- Bardin L. (1975). Le texte et l’image. Communication et langages. 26: 98-112.
- Chernavskaya V. E. (2019). Linguistics of Polycode Communication: Theory and Practice. Moscow: Flinta, 2019. 200 p.
- Danilova A. V. (2020). Emoji as an Element of Polycode Discourse. Questions of Psycholinguistics. 43: 45-60.
- Dawkins R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976. 224 p.
- Evgrafova Yu. A. (2024). Information Exchange in One-Sided Screen Discourse: Encoding and Decoding Features. RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics, and Semantics. 15(2): 313-328.
- Fomin A. G., Gabitov Sh. R. (2024). Polycode Semiosis in Communication on Digital Social Platforms. Modern Linguistics: A Key to Dialogue. 1: 125-128.
- Forceville C., Urios-Aparisi E. (2009). Multimodal Metaphor. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2009. 471 p.
- García-Mayo M., Llamas C., López-Cózar E. D. (2021). Multimodal Semiotics: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Trends. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge. 40-51.
- Golovina L. V. (1986). The Influence of Images on the Semantic Perception of Creolized Texts (Experimental Studies). Speech Influence: Psychological and Psycholinguistic Problems. 82–100.
- Jewitt C. (2014). The Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2014. 378 p.
- Kibrik A. E. (2012). Polycode Semiosis. Linguistic Encyclopedic Dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya Entsiklopediya, 2012. P. 396.
- Kress G., van Leeuwen T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold, 2001. 142 p.
- Lotman Yu. M. (1992). Culture and Explosion. Moscow: Gnosis; Progress, 1992. 272 p.
- Makarova M. L. (2003). Polycode Text in the Modern Communicative Space. Language of Mass Communication: Sociolinguistic Research. 57-66.
- Peirce Ch. S. (2000). Selected Philosophical Works. Moscow: Logos, 2000. 448 с.
- Saussure F. (2025). Course in General Linguistics. A. M. Sukhotin (transl.); R. O. Shor (ed.). Moscow: Yurait, 2025. 303 p.
- Shifman L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Moscow: Novoe Literaturnoe Obozrenie, 2014. 224 p.
- Simon G. K. (2011). Semiotics of the Media. In: Klenk M. L., Rollet M. (eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Semiotics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Pp. 293-308.
- Stepanov Yu. (Ed.) (1983). Semiotics: Collection of Articles. Moscow: Raduga, 1983. 640 p.
- Stöckl H. (2010). Sprache-Bild-Texte lesen. Bausteine zur Methodik einer Grundkompetenz. In: Diekmannshenke H., Klemm M., Stöckl H. (eds.), Bildlinguistik. Berlin: Erich-Schmidt. Pp. 43-70.
- Stöckl H. (2016). Multimodales Verstehen – Zwischen Zeichensystemwissen und Textsortenkompetenz. In: Sachs-Hombach K. (ed.), Verstehen und Verständigung. Intermediale, multimodale und interkulturelle Aspekte von Kommunikation und Ästhetik. Köln: Halem. Pp. 97-100.
Supplementary files
