Assessment of ESP students’ learning outcomes in a digital learning environment
- Авторлар: Inozemtseva K.M.1, Morozova E.V.1, Kolesnikov I.M.1
-
Мекемелер:
- Bauman Moscow State Technical University
- Шығарылым: Том 19, № 4 (2022)
- Беттер: 300-311
- Бөлім: DIGITAL EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2312-8631/article/view/321294
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8631-2022-19-4-300-311
- ID: 321294
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
Problem statement. The description of a pedagogic research in the field of formative assessment theory and practice is presented. The goal of the study is to define pedagogic and methodological conditions for effective evaluation of ESP students’ learning outcomes in a digital learning environment. Methodology. On the basis of key theoretical provisions of formative assessment and interdisciplinary approaches LSP&CLIL, a complete set of criteria-based ESP evaluation tasks and assessment schemes were developed for Business English course delivered in the groups of BMSTU masters students majoring in economics. The approach to grading that correlates with BMSTU point-rating system was substantiated. The comparative analysis of modern platforms allowed to select the domestic service pruff.me, which was used as a ground for a digital assessment space (DAS), a part of BMSTU digital learning environment needed for implementing formative assessment of ESP learning outcomes. Results. The developed evaluation materials integrated in the DAS were tested by ESP students in a distant format. Conclusion. The research showed that creating DAS as an essential component of a university digital learning environment can contribute to effective assessment of ESP students’ competence-based learning outcomes provided that underlying methodology is taken into account and formative assessment technology is implemented in full volume.
Авторлар туралы
Kira Inozemtseva
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: ikm@bmstu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3143-0671
PhD in Education, Associate Professor, Head of Romano-Germanic Languages Department, Faculty of Linguistics
5 2-ya Baumanskaya St, Moscow, 105005, Russian FederationElizaveta Morozova
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Email: lizatih@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7028-9311
senior lecturer, postgraduate student, English for Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Linguistics
5 2-ya Baumanskaya St, Moscow, 105005, Russian FederationIlya Kolesnikov
Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Email: krik.44442@rambler.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2240-7990
master of Linguistics, Faculty of Linguistics
5 2-ya Baumanskaya St, Moscow, 105005, Russian FederationӘдебиет тізімі
- Blinov VI, Dulinov MV, Esenina EYu, Sergeev IS. Pedagogic concept of digital vocational education and training. Moscow: Pero Publ.; 2019. (In Russ.)
- Titova SV. Digital technologies in a foreign language teaching: theory and practice. Moscow: Editus Publ.; 2017. (In Russ.)
- Titova SV. Assessment of project tasks in subject-language integration course: stages, forms, online instruments. Higher Education in Russia. 2022;(2):94-106. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-2-94-106
- Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
- Bloom BS. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Boston: Allyn and Bacon; 1956.
- Scriwen M. The methodology of evaluation. Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally; 1967. p. 39-83.
- Inozemtseva KM. Profile of professional and methodical competence of ESP teachers of technical universities. Sovremennyje Problemy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. 2017;(3):111. (In Russ.)
- Vilkova LV. Formative assessment in implementation of a personally oriented approach (scientific school of Professor M.A. Vikulina). Vestnik Permskogo Gosudarstvennogo Gumanitarno-Pedagogicheskogo Universiteta. Seriya 1. Psykhologicheskiye i Pedagogicheskiye Nauki. 2017;(2):15-23. (In Russ.)
- Clark I. Formative assessment: policy, perspectives and practice. Journal of Educational Administration and Policy. 2011;4(2):158-180.
- Briggs D, Ruiz-Primo M, Furtak E, Shepard L. Meta-analytic methodology and inferences about the efficacy of formative assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice. 2012;31(4):13-17.
- Prilipko EV. Assessment activity of a teacher in the competence-based paradigm: development of conscious competence. Innovatsionnyje Project i Programmy Obrazovanija. 2017;(1):30-35. (In Russ.)
- Dudley-Evans T, St John M-J. Developments in English for specific purposes: a multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
- Vikulina MA, Vilkova LV. The elements of the methodology regulating formative assessment of university students’ academic achievements in foreign language mastering. PNRPU Linguistics and Pedagogy Bulletin. 2019;(2):131-139. (In Russ.) http://doi.org/10.15593/2224-9389/2019.2.12
- Prilipko EV, Inozemtseva KM. Educational values in assessment: a professional development course for tertiary English language teachers in Russia. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies (EDULEARN18). Mallorca; 2018. p. 11163-11170.
Қосымша файлдар
