The U.S. and China: Policy Approaches to Sanctions and Counter Sanctions
- Autores: Timofeev I.N.1
-
Afiliações:
- MGIMO University
- Edição: Volume 25, Nº 3 (2025): Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Bandung Conference: The Evolving Role of Asian and African Countries in World Politics
- Páginas: 538-552
- Seção: INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC RELATIONS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-0660/article/view/320632
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-3-538-552
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YEDXGD
- ID: 320632
Citar
Resumo
Since the establishment of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, the United States has been actively using unilateral economic measures (sanctions) against China. After the start of the normalization of political relations between the two nations in the 1970s, the number of restrictive measures decreased, covering only narrow areas of trade by the early 2000s. However, during the first term of Donald Trump’s presidency, sanctions were reintroduced into the U.S. policy arsenal towards China. Though this issue has been widely examined in academic literature, several gaps still remain in current research. China has proven to be too specific case for studies employing quantitative data on sanctions against numerous countries, and gaps continue to remain even in sources that solely analyze the Chinese case. Existing research also tends to focus only on the current political situation, while few studies explore the issue in its historical depth. By examining U.S. sanctions against the PRC, ways in which China has adapted to these sanctions, reciprocal measures taken by China, as well as the reasons for the slow escalation and de-escalation of sanctions, both at the present stage and in historical hindsight, the following research aims to fill in the remaining gaps in understanding U.S. - China sanctions. The Chinese case deviates from the established theoretical premise in existing literature that a change in the political course of the target country is a fundamental criterion for assessing the effectiveness of sanctions. However, sanctions have proven to be effective even if the above-mentioned objective is not achieved. Signaling and deterrence make up for the shortcomings in forcing a target country to change its foreign or domestic policies. The use of sanctions as a signaling tool may help explain why U.S. approaches to sanction de-escalation and escalation are cautious in nature. Drastic measures may prove to be redundant for sending political signals, while moderate actions are more suitable in this regard. The imposition of U.S. sanctions as a tool to deter China’s advancement in the high-tech sector has contributed to an increase in Beijing’s efforts to develop its own restrictive measures. The methodology utilized for this research includes an analysis of documents reflecting the U.S. sanctions policy against China and the recent countermeasures developed by the PRC.
Sobre autores
Ivan Timofeev
MGIMO University
Autor responsável pela correspondência
Email: itimofeev@russiancouncil.ru
ORCID ID: 0000-0003-1676-2221
Código SPIN: 3517-3084
PhD (Political Science), Associate Professor, Department of Political Theory
76 Vernadsky Avenue, Moscow, 119454, Russian FederationBibliografia
- Andersen, J. (2024). The lawfulness of unilateral sanctions in the wake of a US - China “sanctions war”. East Asia, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-024-09429-9; EDN: RHSMBH
- Bakulina, P. V., & Kuzmina, K. A. (2021). China’s policy of economic sanctions: Legislation and enforcement. Financial Journal, 13(4), 24-38. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2021-4-24-38; EDN: GXVVDZ
- Bapat, N. A., Heinrich, T., Kobayashi, Y., & Morgan, T. C. (2013). Determinants of sanctions effectiveness: Sensitivity analysis using new data. International Interactions, 39(1), 79-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2013.751298
- Chen, X. J. (2006). China and the US trade embargo, 1950-1972. American Journal of Chinese Studies, 13(2), 169-186. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/44288827
- Danilin, I. V. (2021). The U.S. - China technological war: Digital technologies as a new factor of world politics? Russia in Global Affairs, 19(4), 78-96. https://doi.org/10.31278/1810-6374-2021-19-4-78-96; EDN: YVVEAA
- DeLisle, J., & Goldstein, A. (Eds.). (2021). After engagement: Dilemmas in U.S. - China security relations. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctv11hpt2r
- Drezner, D. (1999). The sanctions paradox: Economic statecraft and international relations. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Fuller, D. B. (2021). China’s counter-strategy to American export controls in integrated circuits. China Leadership Monitor, (67), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3798291
- Giumelli, F. (2016). The purposes of targeted sanctions. In T. J. Beirsteker, S. E. Eckert & M. Tourihno (Eds.), Targeted sanctions. The impacts and effectiveness of United Nations action (pp. 38-59). New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hufbauer, G. C., Shott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2009). Economic sanctions reconsidered. 3rd edition. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Retrieved from https://dl1.cuni.cz/pluginfile.php/863435/mod_resource/content/0/Gary%20Clyde%20Hufbauer%2C%20Jeffrey%20J.%20Schott%2C%20Kimberly%20Ann%20Elliott%2C%20Barbara%20Oegg-Economic%20Sanctions%20Reconsidered%20%282008%29.pdf
- Kashin, V. B., Piatachkova, A. S., & Krasheninnikova, L. S. (2020). Chinese economic sanctions policy: Theory and practice. Comparative Politics Russia, 11(2), 123-138. (In Russian). EDN: DXBKYE
- Kissinger, H. (2012). On China. New York: Penguin Books.
- Lampton, D. M. (2019). Reconsidering U.S. - China relations. Asia Policy, 14(2), 43-60. https://www.nbr.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/publications/ap14_2_lampton_apr2019.pdf
- Lampton, D. M. (2024). Living U.S. - China relations. London: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
- Medeiros, E. S. (2019). The changing fundamentals of US - China relations. The Washington Quarterly, 42(3), 93-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2019.1666355
- Schindler, S., Alami, I., DiCarlo, J., Jepson, N., Rolf, S., & et al. (2024). The Second Cold War: U.S. - China competition for centrality in infrastructure, digital, production, and finance networks. Geopolitics, 29(4), 1083-1120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432
- Syropoulos, C., Felbermayr, G., Kirilakha, A., Yalcin, E., & Yotov, Y. V. (2024). The global sanctions data base - Release 3: COVID-19, Russia, and multilateral sanctions. Review of International Economics, 32(1), 12-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12691
- Timofeev, I. N. (2023). How to study the policy of sanctions? The vision of empirical research. Journal of International Analytics, 14(1), 22-36. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-1-22-36; EDN: OYFVYS
- Timofeev, I. N. (2024). The U.S. secondary sanctions related to Russia: Empirical analysis. Comparative Politics Russia, 15(1), 95-114. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2221-3279-2024-1-15-95-114; EDN: YWQECI
- Xu, Zh., & Lin, F. (2021). The political economy of U.S. sanctions against China. In S. Davis & I. Ness (Eds.), Sanctions as war: Anti-imperialist perspectives om American geo-economic strategy (pp. 306-320). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501201_019
- Zamorin, V. A., & Splender, V. A. (2022). Analytical review of the sanctions imposed by the United States against the People’s Republic of China in the field of military-technical cooperation with foreign countries. Ekonomika i Predprinimatel’stvo, (6), 285-290. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2022.143.6.053 EDN: PEXKER
- Zuenko, I. Yu. (2022). American sanctions towards China: 1990-2010s. Rossiya i Amerika v XXI Veke, (6), 15. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18254/S207054760023470-4; EDN: RTFJQU
Arquivos suplementares
