ICT Security in U.S. Foreign Policy Towards Latin America: The Case of the Biden Administration’s Discourse
- Authors: Sokolshchik L.M.1, Yanikeeva I.O.1, Toropchin G.V.2,3
-
Affiliations:
- National Research University Higher School of Economics
- Novosibirsk State Technical University
- National Research Tomsk State University
- Issue: Vol 25, No 3 (2025): Celebrating the 70th Anniversary of the Bandung Conference: The Evolving Role of Asian and African Countries in World Politics
- Pages: 469-484
- Section: APPLIED ANALYSYS
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-0660/article/view/320628
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2025-25-3-469-484
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WNKTNS
- ID: 320628
Cite item
Abstract
The issue of information and communication technology (ICT) security is becoming increasingly important in the context of international relations and foreign policy. In the present study, the authors analyze the discourse of the Joseph Biden administration in the field of international ICT security in the Latin American dimension, with the aim of identifying the underlying ideology that supports and justifies the U.S. power relations with the region. The scientific novelty of the present study lies in the integrated application of the critical discourse analysis (CDA) method, which allows examining how language practices shape ICT security perceptions and political reality. In addition, the study employs quantitative content analysis, which provides insights into attributed threats, primarily among state actors. The authors conduct the CDA at the contextual and discursive levels. The study’s extensive source base includes materials from U.S. government agencies, encompassing the period from January 2021 to November 2024. The authors critically examine the image of the United States as an agent constructing international ICT security in the Latin American dimension from the perspective of its hegemonic aspirations. The image of Latin America as a region vulnerable in the ICT space and in need of paternalism from Washington is a significant element of the U.S. discourse. At the same time, the images of China and Russia are presented as the main sources of threat to the region to justify the dominant role of the United States. In the background of American discourse, the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) are presented as limited but growing threats to ICT security. These discursive practices serve as a tool to legitimize American influence and promote its strategic interests in the region.
About the authors
Lev M. Sokolshchik
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Author for correspondence.
Email: lsokolshchik@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0945-1022
SPIN-code: 6958-8932
PhD (History), Leading Researcher, Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies
17 Malaya Ordynka St, Moscow, 119017, Russian FederationInna O. Yanikeeva
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Email: iyanikeeva@hse.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9590-5301
SPIN-code: 5148-7454
PhD (Political Science), Researcher, Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies
17 Malaya Ordynka St, Moscow, 119017, Russian FederationGleb V. Toropchin
Novosibirsk State Technical University; National Research Tomsk State University
Email: glebtoropchin@mail.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8055-1202
SPIN-code: 1524-2434
PhD (History), Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, Faculty of Humanities, Novosibirsk State Technical University; Senior Research Fellow, Center for Eurasian Studies, National Research Tomsk State University
20 K. Marksa Avenue, Novosibirsk, 630073, Russian Federation; 36 Lenina Avenue, Tomsk, 634050, Russian FederationReferences
- Bolgov, R. (2020). The UN and cybersecurity policy of Latin American countries. 2020 7th International Conference on eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG 2020 (pp. 259-263). Buenos Aires: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096798; EDN: CFHGPI
- Buzan, B., Weaver, O., & de Wilde, J. (1998). Security: A new framework for Analysis. London: Boulder, Lynne Rienner Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/39047709/Buzan_Waever_and_De_Wilde_ 1998_Security_A_New_Framework_For_Analysis
- Campbell, D. (1993). Politics without principle: Sovereignty, ethics, and the narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781685856090
- Fomin, I. V. (2014a). Representations of state formations in political discourse analysis (the case of Kosovo). Polis. Political Studies, (2), 124-137. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2014.02.09; EDN: RXHOPN
- Fomin, I. V. (2014b). The category of image as a means of studying the political reality (the example of the image of South Ossetia in the Russian foreign policy discourse). In Symbolic politics: Collection of articles (Issue 2: Debates on the Past as Designing the Future, pp. 40-65). Moscow: Institut nauchnoi informatsii po obshchestvennym naukam RAN publ. (In Russian). EDN: ULCLXR
- Henshaw, A. (2024). Capacity building and cyber insecurity in Latin America: Geopolitics, Surveillance, and Disinformation. In A. Mhajne & A. Henshaw (Eds.), Critical perspectives on cybersecurity: Feminist and postcolonial interventions (pp. 173-193). New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197695883.003.0008
- Hurel, L. M. (2022). Interrogating the cybersecurity development agenda: A critical reflection. The International Spectator, 57(3), 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2022.2095824; EDN: SPVBPZ
- Kheifets, V. L., & Khadorich, L. V. (2015). Latin America between OAS and CELAC. World Eсonomy and International Relations, (4), 90-100. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2015-4-90-100; EDN: TRNTVZ1`
- Krebs, R. R. (2015). How dominant narratives rise and fall: Military conflict, politics, and the Cold War consensus. International Organization, 69(4), 809-845. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818315000181
- Krutskikh, A. V. (2022). International information security: In search of consolidated approaches : Interview with Andrey V. Krutskikh, Special Representative of the President of the Russian Federation for International Cooperation in the Field of Information Security. Interviewed by D. A. Piskunov. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 22(2), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2022-22-2-342-351; EDN: DVBISA
- Miao, W., Xu, J., & Zhu, H. (2019). From technological issue to military-diplomatic affairs: Analysis of China’s official cybersecurity discourse (1994-2016). In J. Hunsinger, M. Allen & L. Klastrup (Eds.), Second international handbook of internet research (pp. 1-13). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1202-4_61-1
- Pakhalyuk, K. A. (2018). Intellectual origins of discursive analysis in political studies. Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and Political Science, 24(1), 71-97. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.24290/1029-3736-2018-24-1-71-97; EDN: YUPBIH
- Ponka, T. I., Ramich, M. S. & Wu, Y. (2020). Information policy and information security of PRC: Development, approaches and implementation. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 20(2), 382-394. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2020-20-2-382-394; EDN: UANODL
- Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2009). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse analysis: 2nd revised edition (pp. 87-121). London: SAGE. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/251636976_The_Discourse-Historical_Approach_DHA
- Siudak, R. (2022). Cybersecurity discourses and their policy implications. Journal of Cyber Policy, 7(3), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1080/23738871.2023.2167607; EDN: MLSWMA
- Sokolshchik, L. M., Sakaev, V. T., & Galimullin, E. Z. (2023). Illegal immigration from Latin America amid the 2024 U.S. presidential campaign: Polarization effects. Journal of International Analytics, 14(3), 106-126. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2023-14-3-106-126; EDN: FTAYME
- Sokolshchik, L. M., Sokolshchik, Yu. S., & Teremetskiy, K. S. (2024). Discursive strategies for legitimizing U.S. sanctions policy towards Russia (2021-2023). Polis. Political Studies, (3), 109-125. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.03.08; EDN: NTYWXM
- Sokolshchik, L. M. (2024). Year one of the Biden administration: U.S. foreign policy Towards Russia. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 15(1), 70-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/18793665231170639; EDN: AMHXNS
- Sokolshchik, L., & Sokolshchik, Y. (2023). Why U.S. - Russia relations failed: an analysis of competing national security narratives. Russian Politics, 8(4), 468-492. https://doi.org/10.30965/24518921-00803009; EDN: YFYVMB
- Stadnik, I. T. (2024). How to study ICT-security policy: Opportunities and challenges for critical discourse-analysis. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations, 17(2), 183-200. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu06.2024.205; EDN: NKMILI
- Svirchevskii, D. A., & Fomin, I. V. (2023). Images of Europe in the discourse of German left- and right-wing populists: Between solidarity Europe and fortress Europe. Polis. Political Studies, (2), 27-40. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2023.02.03; EDN: YGNOEA
- Tikk, E., & Kerttunen, M. (2020). Introduction. In E. Tikk & M. Kerttunen (Eds.), Routledge handbook of international cybersecurity (pp. 1-8). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351038904
- Urbanovics, A. (2022). Cybersecurity policy-related developments in Latin America. AARMS - Academic and Applied Research in Military and Public Management Science, 21(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.32565/aarms.2022.1.6; EDN: JOBKFG
- Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059565
- Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
- Zinovieva, E., & Ignatov, A. (2023). The role of BRICS in the international ICT security regime. International Trends / Mezhdunarodnye Protsessy, 21(4), 104-132. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17994/IT.2023.21.4.75.2; EDN: AVLWZW
Supplementary files
