Elite Dynamics and Political Gamesmanship: Exploring the Modern Stage of Elitogenesis
- Authors: Solovyev A.I.1
-
Affiliations:
- Lomonosov Moscow State University
- Issue: Vol 27, No 2 (2025): Political Game Studies
- Pages: 272-284
- Section: POLITICAL GAME STUDIES
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322497
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2025-27-2-272-284
- EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KPMLQD
- ID: 322497
Cite item
Abstract
According to the contemporary stage of elitist origin, elite rivalry is the primary driver of societal change. In this way, the most potent catalysts for significant inventions and politically motivated initiatives in contemporary governments are the political ploys and manipulations of elite groups. However, the ways in which the ruling circles actually carry out their duties are more closely linked to coalitional forms of political dominance that emerge at the nexus of the interests of different elite groups, a confluence of their status and unofficial connections. However, their managerial competencies have not grown as much as the population as a whole, which sets the stage for decision-making and resource allocation to become more opaque. Clarifying the true effects of these changes on the dynamics of the ruling class as well as the interactions between the state and society presents a study challenge in this setting. The use of network approaches and structural and functional research methods enables us to state that, even today, the coalition “games” in the ruling class signal the structural self-renewal of the ruling circles, bringing more autonomous (post) elite communities that control key resource allocation mechanisms while simultaneously losing their responsibility to society. This is in addition to the adjustment of political projects or ideological and political compromises in updating government strategies. In addition to enhancing the latent character of public policy development and the distance between them, their informal means of influencing public policy aim to deepen the internal differences within the ruling circles.
Keywords
About the authors
Alexander I. Solovyev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Author for correspondence.
Email: solovyev@spa.msu.ru
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7146-0299
Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Political Analysis, Faculty of Public Administration
Moscow, Russian FederationReferences
- Best, H., & Higley, J. (Eds). (2010). Democratic Elitism: New Theoretical and Comparatives Perspectives. Leiden: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004179394.i-230
- Díaz, M. (2021). The scientific method in public political activity. Academia Letters, Article 2996, 1–5.
- Gill, S. (1995). The global panopticon? The neoliberal state, economic life, and democratic surveillance. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political. SAGE Publications.
- Harkordin, O. (2021). Republic. Full version. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the European University in St. Petersburg. (In Russian)
- Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2012). The elite variable in democratic transitions and breakdowns. Historical Social Research. Elite Foundations of Social Theory and Politics, 37(1), 245–268.
- Higley, J., & Pakulsky, J. (2012). Elites, elitism and elite theory: Unending confusion? In Papers for Word Congress of the International Political Science Association, 161–176.
- Ibarra, P.R., & Kitsuse, J.I. (2003). Claims-making discourse and vernacular resources. In J.A. Holstein and G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: constructionist perspectives on social problems (pp. 21–54). Hawthorne, New York: Aldine de Gruyter Publ.
- Jessop, B. (2019). Authoritarian neoliberalism: Periodization and critique. South Atlantic Quarterly, 118(2), 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-7381182
- Jessop, B. (2019). The state: Past, present and future. Moscow: Delo Publishing House (In Russian) EDN: FXZBWZ
- Kavtaradze, S. (2015). Archetypes of war (violence, the unconscious and the struggle for basic needs). Moscow: Homo erectus. (In Russian)
- Keller, S. (1963). Beyond the ruling class: Strategic elites in modern society. N.Y.: Random House.
- Khudoley, K. K., & Kolotaev, Y. Y. (2024) Dividing lines in the EU’s common foreign policy: Russia as a polarising factor. Baltic Region, 16(3), 87—107. http://doi.org/10.5922/2079-8555-2024-3-5 EDN: HYPERLINK “https://elibrary.ru/qydcgs”QYDCGS
- Ledeneva, A.V. (2013). Can Russia modernise? Sistema, power networks and informal governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978494 EDN: URWGFJ
- Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How democracies die. New York.
- Likhachev, D.S. (1990). On the national character of Russians. Voprosy filosofii, (4), 3–6. (In Russian)
- Lushnikov, D. (2019). Government-organized non-governmental Organizations (NGOs): The genesis of problematics, interpretation and Functions. Polis. Political Studies, (2). 137–148. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2019.02.10 EDN: ZACLWH
- Malinova, O.Yu. (2009). Russia and the “West” in the twentieth century. Transformation of the discourse on collective identity. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia. (In Russian) EDN: QOJUIH
- Okhotsky, E.V., & Grigoryan, D.K. (2022). Information and communication technologies in ensuring elite leadership positioning. In Power and elites in the era of digital transformation: new challenges and threats, trajectories of socio-political development of modern society (pp. 47–53). Rostov-on-Don: RANEPA Law Institute. (In Russian)
- Pleis, Ya.A. (2024). The political elite of post-Soviet Russia: Stages of transformation, problems of improvement. Moscow: Political Encyclopedia. (In Russian)
- Przeworski, A. (2019). Crises of democracy. Cambridge.
- Roll, M. (2014). The politics of public sector performance: Pockets of effectiveness in developing countries. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857718
- Runciman, D. (2018). How democracy ends. London.
- Shanahan, E., Jones, M., & McBeth, M. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. The Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
- Smorgunov, L.V. (2021). Three strategies of digitalization policy: Public administration and the transformational potential of digital technologies. In Gaman-Golutvina, O.V, A.I. Solovyev, & A.I. Shcherbinin (Eds.), Mosaic field of world and Russian public policy. RAPN Yearbook 2020–2021 (pp. 9–33). Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press. (In Russian) EDN: RYLDDK
- Solovyev, A.I. (2021a). Politics and Government. Essays on Theory and methodology. Moscow: Aspect press. (In Russian)
- Solovyev, A.I. (2021b). “Evidence policy” and “Evidence policy”: The dilemma of post-Soviet societies. Outlines of global transformations: Politics, economics, law, 14(5), 60–81. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2021-14-5-3 EDN: YQPVXI
- Solovyev, A.I. (2024). Mechanisms of political domination or how a winning coalition rules. Polis. Political Studies, (2), 96–117. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2024.02.08 EDN: CGFBMG
- Stagner, R. (1936). Fascist attitudes: An exploratory study. The Journal of Social Psychology, 7(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1936.9919882
- Twersky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1986). Rational choice and the framing of decisions. In R.M. Hogarth & M.W. Reder (Eds.), Rational choice: the contrast between economics and psychology (pp. 251–278). Chicago. https://doi.org/10.1086/296365
Supplementary files
