Digital Echo Chambers as Phenomenon of Political Space
- Авторлар: Beznosov M.A.1, Golikov A.S.2
-
Мекемелер:
- University of West Georgia
- V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University
- Шығарылым: Том 24, № 3 (2022): Internet and Politics
- Беттер: 499-516
- Бөлім: POLITICAL POLARIZATION AND INTERNET PROTEST
- URL: https://journal-vniispk.ru/2313-1438/article/view/322615
- DOI: https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2022-24-3-499-516
- ID: 322615
Дәйексөз келтіру
Толық мәтін
Аннотация
This article attempts to provide a comprehensive overview of the academic literature on the subject, examining the different approaches, their similarities and general differences, advantages and disadvantages, and providing a consolidated and critical perspective that will hopefully be useful for future research in the field. The paper presents the results of a systematic review of Western academic studies on the existence of echo chambers in social media, an initial classification of the literature and the identification of research patterns. The authors show how conceptual and methodological choices influence research findings on the topic. Future research should take into account the potential shortcomings of different approaches and the significant potential of linking data.
Негізгі сөздер
Авторлар туралы
Mikhail Beznosov
University of West Georgia
Хат алмасуға жауапты Автор.
Email: mbeznosov@westga.edu
ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6146-1802
PhD in Political Sciences, PhD Candidate in Sociology, Political Department of Civic Engagement and Public Service
Carrolton, United States of AmericaAlexander Golikov
V.N. Karazin Kharkov National University
Email: a.s.golikov@gmail.com
ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6786-0393
Doctor of Sociological Sciences (Dr. Hab. in Sociology), Associate Professor of Sociology Department and Political Sociology Department
UkraineӘдебиет тізімі
- Allcott, H., Braghieri, L., Eichmeyer, S., & Gentzkow, M. (2020). The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, 110(3): 629-76. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257%2Faer.20190658&utm_campaign=Johannes.
- Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
- Arendt, H. (1972). Crises of the Republic: Lying in Politics; Civil Disobedience; On Violence; Thoughts on Politics and Revolution. Harcourt, Brace & Co.
- Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L.A. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook6. Science, 348(6239), 1130-1132.
- Barberá, P. (2015). How social media reduces mass political polarization. Evidence from Germany, Spain, and the U.S. Paper presented at the 2015 APSA conference. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from: http://pablobarbera.com/static/barbera_polarization_APSA.pdf.
- Barberá, P., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., Tucker, J.A., & Bonneau, R. (2015). Tweeting from left to right: Is online political communication more than an echo chamber? Psychological Science, 26(10), 1531-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615594620
- Barsukov, N. (2018). “Echo Chamber” Effect in the Internet: An Exploration of Brexit Case. The state and citizens in the electronic environment, 2, 3-86. (In Russian)
- Bartlett, B. (2015). How Fox News changed American media and political dynamics. SSRN. Retrieved June, 3, 2022, from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2604679.
- Beam, M.A., & Kosicki, G.M. (2014). Personalized news portals: Filtering systems and increased news exposure. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 91(1), 59-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699013514411
- Beam, M.A., Hutchens, M.J., & Hmielowski, J.D. (2018). Facebook7 news and (de)polarization: Reinforcing spirals in the 2016 US election. Information, Communication & Society, 21(7), 940-958. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1444783
- Benkler, Y., Faris, R.M., Hal, R., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., & Zuckerman, E. (2017). Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3019414
- Benton, M.C., & Radziwill, N.M. (2016). “Bot or Not? Deciphering Time Maps for Tweet Interarrivals.” ArXiv:1605.06555 [Cs], May. Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1605.06555
- Berentson-Shaw, J. (2018). A matter of fact: Talking truth in a post-truth world. Wellington, New Zealand: Bridget Williams Books.
- Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking8 It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 9(4), 352-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.709045
- Bos, L., Kruikemeier, S., & de Vreese, C. (2016). Nation binding: How public service broadcasting mitigates political selective exposure. PLoS ONE, 11(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155112
- Bruns, A. (2019). Filter bubble. Internet Policy Review, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1426
- Centola, D., & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702-34.
- Ceron, A., & Memoli, V. (2016). Flames and debates: Do social media affect satisfaction with democracy? Social Indicators Research, 126(1), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0893-x
- Dahlgren, P.M. (2019). Selective exposure to public service news over thirty years: The role of ideological leaning, party support, and political interest. International Journal of Press/ Politics, 24(3), 293-314.
- Dimitrova, D.V., Shehata, A., Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L.W. (2014). The effects of digital media on political knowledge and participation in election campaigns: Evidence from panel data. Communication Research, 41(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211426004
- Dizney, H.F., Roskens, R.W. (1962) An Investigation of the ‘Bandwagon Effect’ in a College Straw Election. The Journal of Educational Sociology, 36(3), 108-114
- Dubois, E. (2015). The strategic opinion leader: Personal influence and political networks in a hybrid media system (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:35b1e408-a70a-4ea0-9c41-10d7df024ee9
- Dubois, E., & Grant Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
- Dvir-Gvirsman, S., Tsfati, Y., & Menchen-Trevino, E. (2016). The extent and nature of ideological selective exposure online: Combining survey responses with actual web log data from the 2013 Israeli elections. New Media & Society, 18(5), 857-877.
- Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. New York, NY: Row, Peterson
- Fletcher, R., Cornia, А., & Nielsen, R.K. (2018). Measuring the Reach of „Fake News” and Online Disinformation in Europe. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Retrieved June, 7, 2022 from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/measuring-reach-fake-news-and-online-disinformation-europe
- Fletcher, R., Cornia, А., & Nielsen, R.K. (2020). “How Polarized Are Online and Offline News Audiences? A Comparative Analysis of Twelve Countries.” The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(2), 169-195.
- Fletcher, R., Robertson, C.T., & Nielsen, R.K. (2021). How Many People Live in Politically Partisan Online News Echo Chambers in Different Countries? Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 1. https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2021.020
- Garrett, R.K. (2013). Selective exposure: New methods and new directions. Communication Methods and Measures, 7(3-4), 247-256.
- Garrett, R.K., & Stroud, N.J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro- and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680-701.
- Garrett, R.K., Carnahan, D., & Lynch, E.K. (2013). A turn toward avoidance? Selective exposure to online political information, 2004-2008. Political Behavior, 35(1), 113-134.
- Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J.M. & Sinkinson, M. (2011). The effect of newspaper entry and exit on electoral politics. American Economic Review, 101(7), 2980-3018.
- Groshek, J., & Koc-Michalska K. (2017). Helping populism win? Social media use, filter bubbles, and support for populist presidential candidates in the 2016 US election campaign. Information, Communication & Society, 20(9), 1389-1407.
- Guess, A.M. (2021). (Almost) everything in moderation: New evidence on Americans’ online media diets. American Journal of Political Science, 65(4), 1007-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12589
- Guess, A.M., Nyhan, B., Lyons, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. Miami, FL: Knight Foundation.
- Guo, L., Rohde, J.A. & Wu, H.D. (2020). Who is responsible for Twitter’s echo chamber problem? Evidence from 2016 U.S. election networks, Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 234-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1499793
- Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Henshel, R.L., & Johnston, W. (1987). The Emergence of Bandwagon Effects: A Theory. The Sociological Quarterly, 28(4), 493-511.
- Himelboim, I., McCreery, S., & Smith, M. (2013). Birds of a feather tweet together: Integrating network and content analyses to examine cross-ideology exposure on Twitter. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(2), 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12001
- Jamieson, K.H., & Cappella, J.N. (2008). Balkanization of Knowledge and Interpretation (рр. 191-213). New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/609
- Janis, I.L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Justwan, F., Baumgaertner, B., Carlisle, J.E., Clark, A.K., & Clark, M.M. (2018). Social media echo chambers and satisfaction with democracy among Democrats and Republicans in the aftermath of the 2016 US elections. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(4), 424-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1434784
- Kaiser, B. (2019). Targeted: The Cambridge Analytica Whistleblower’s Inside Story of How Big Data, Trump, and Facebook9 Broke Democracy and How It Can Happen Again. Harper Collins.
- Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2020). The German Far-Right on YouTube: An analysis of user overlap and user comments. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 64(3), 373-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2020.1799690
- Keen, Suzanne (2007). Empathy and the Novel. Oxford: Oxford UP.
- Kim, Y., Hsu, S.-H., & de Zuniga, H.G. (2013). Influence of social media use on discussion network heterogeneity and civic engagement: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 498-516.
- Klapper, J.T. (1960). The effects of mass communication. New York: Free Press.
- Lu, J., & Yu, X. (2020). Does the Internet make us more intolerant? A contextual analysis in 33 countries. Information, Communication & Society, 23(2), 252-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 369118X.2018.1499794
- Martyanov, D.S., & Martyanova, N.A. (2019). Manageability of Virtual Communities: A Comparative Analysis of Politicized Groups in Vkontakte. Journal of Political Research, 3(3), 79-93. (In Russian)
- Martyanov, D., & Bykov I. (2017). Ideological segregation in the Russian cyberspace: Evidences from St. Petersburg. In Digital Transformation and Global Society Second International Conference (pp. 259-270). DTGS 2017 St. Petersburg, Russia, June 21-23. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69784-0_22
- Masip, P., Suau, J., & Ruiz-Caballero, C. (2020). Incidental exposure to non-like-minded news through social media: Opposing voices in echo-chambers’ news feeds. Media and Communication, 8(4), 53-62
- Massanari, A. (2015). Participatory culture, community, and play: Learning from reddit. PeterLang Inc., International Academic Publishers
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J.M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415-444
- Messing, S., & Westwood, S.J. (2014). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements Trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042-1063
- Moeller, J., Trilling, D., Helberger, N., Irion, K., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Shrinking core? Exploring the differential agenda setting power of traditional and personalized news media. Info, 18(6), 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-05-2016-0020
- Nickerson, R. (1998). Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, 175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- Nelson, J.L., & Webster, J.G. (2017). The myth of partisan selective exposure: A portrait of the online political news audience. Social Media + Society, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117729314
- Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Schulz, A., Andı, S., Robertson, C.T., & Nielsen, R.K. (2021). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2021. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism
- Nguyen, A., & Vu, H.T. (2019). Testing popular news discourse on the “echo chamber” effect: Does political polarisation occur among those relying on social media as their primary politics news source? First Monday, 24(5). Retrieved June, 7, 2022, from: https://firstmonday.org/ article/view/9632/7807
- Nickerson, R.S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
- Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: a theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2): 43-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.x
- Papacharissi, Z., & de Fatima Oliveira, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62(2), 266-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01630.x
- Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Viking
- Preston, P. (2016). Trust in the media is the first casualty of the post-factual world. Guardian (24 September). Retrieved June, 7. 2022 from https://www.theguardian.com/media/2016/sep/24/trust-in-media-first-casualty-post-factual-war-corbyn-trump
- Salari, Sonia & Sillito, Carrie. (2015). Intimate partner homicide suicide: Perpetrator primary intent across young, middle, and elder adult age categories. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.11.004
- Sears, D.O., & Freedman, J.L. (1967). Selective exposure to information: A critical review. Public Opinion Quarterly, 31(2), 194-213
- Spohr, D. (2017). Fake news and ideological polarization: Filter bubbles and selective exposure on social media. Business Information Review, 34(3), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266382117722446
- Sunstein, C. (2002). The Law of group polarization. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 175-195
- Sunstein, C. (2009). Republic. Com 2.0. New York, NY: Princeton UP
- Tait, A. (2016). Control, alt-right, retweet: How social media paved the way for President Trump. New Statesman (10 November). Retrieved June,7, 2022, from https://www.newstatesman.com/world/north-america/2016/11/control-alt-right-retweet-how-social-media-paved-way-president-trump.
- Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R.M., & Pingree, R.J. (2015). News Recommendations from Social Media Opinion Leaders: Effects on Media Trust and Information Seeking, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20(5), 520-535. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
- Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J.A. (2015). Political expression and action on social media: Exploring the relationship between lower- and higher-threshold political activities among Twitter users in Italy. Journal of ComputerMediated Communication, 20(2), 221-239
- Vaccari, C., Valeriani, A., Barberá, P., Jost, J.T., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J.A. (2016). Of echo chambers and contrarian clubs: Exposure to political disagreement among German and Italian users of Twitter. Social Media + Society, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664221
- Volodenkov, S.V., & Fedorchenko, S.N. (2021) Digital Infrastructures of Civic and Political Activism: Current Challenges, Risks and Constraints. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, 6, 97-118. https://doi.org/10.14515/monitoring.2021.6.2014 (In Russian)
- Webster, J.G., & Ksiazek, T. (2012). The Dynamics of Audience Fragmentation: Public Attention in an Age of Digital Media. Journal of Communication. 62. 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01616.x
- Xenos, M., Vromen, A., & Brian, D. Loader (2014) The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies, Information, Communication & Society, 17(2), 151-167, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2013.871318
- Yang, T., Majó-Vázquez, S., Nielsen, R.K., & González-Bailón, S. (2020). Exposure to news grows less fragmented with an increase in mobile access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(46), 28678-28683
- Zamkov, A.V. (2019). The Echo Chamber Effect as a Manifestation of the Principle of SelfSimilarity on Social Networks. Mediaskop, 2. (In Russian). Retrieved April, 15, 2022 from http://www.mediascope.ru/2548 https://doi.org/10.30547/mediascope.2.2019.7 (In Russian)
- Zimmer, K. Scheibe, M. Stock, & Stock, W.G. (2019). Echo chambers and filter bubbles of fake news in social media. Man-made or produced by algorithms? In 8th Annual Arts, Humanities, Social Sciences & Education Conference (pp. 1-22). Prince Waikiki, Honolulu, Hawaii. January 3, 4, & 5, 2019, Hawaii University
- Zúñiga, H.G. de, Nakwon Jung & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Қосымша файлдар
